Cargando…
The Computerized Cognitive Composite (C3) in A4, an Alzheimer’s Disease Secondary Prevention Trial
BACKGROUND: Computerized cognitive assessments may improve Alzheimer’s disease (AD) secondary prevention trial efficiency and accuracy. However, they require validation against standard outcomes and relevant biomarkers. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and validity of the tablet-based Computeriz...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7755110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33336226 http://dx.doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2020.38 |
_version_ | 1783626302226432000 |
---|---|
author | Papp, K.V. Rentz, D.M. Maruff, P. Sun, C.-K. Raman, R. Donohue, M.C. Schembri, A. Stark, C. Yassa, M.A. Wessels, A.M. Yaari, R. Holdridge, K.C. Aisen, P.S. Sperling, R.A. |
author_facet | Papp, K.V. Rentz, D.M. Maruff, P. Sun, C.-K. Raman, R. Donohue, M.C. Schembri, A. Stark, C. Yassa, M.A. Wessels, A.M. Yaari, R. Holdridge, K.C. Aisen, P.S. Sperling, R.A. |
author_sort | Papp, K.V. |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Computerized cognitive assessments may improve Alzheimer’s disease (AD) secondary prevention trial efficiency and accuracy. However, they require validation against standard outcomes and relevant biomarkers. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and validity of the tablet-based Computerized Cognitive Composite (C3). DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of cognitive screening data from the A4 study (Anti-Amyloid in Asymptomatic AD). SETTING: Multi-center international study. PARTICIPANTS: Clinically normal (CN) older adults (65–85; n=4486) MEASUREMENTS: Participants underwent florbetapir-Positron Emission Tomography for Aβ+/− classification. They completed the C3 and standard paper and pencil measures included in the Preclinical Alzheimer’s Cognitive Composite (PACC). The C3 combines memory measures sensitive to change over time (Cogstate Brief Battery-One Card Learning) and measures shown to be declining early in AD including pattern separation (Behavioral Pattern Separation Test- Object-Lure Discrimination Index) and associative memory (Face Name Associative Memory Exam- Face-Name Matching). C3 acceptability and completion rates were assessed using qualitative and quantitative methods. C3 performance was explored in relation to Aβ+/− groups (n=1323/3163) and PACC. RESULTS: C3 was feasible for CN older adults to complete. Rates of incomplete or invalid administrations were extremely low, even in the bottom quartile of cognitive performers (PACC). C3 was moderately correlated with PACC (r=0.39). Aβ+ performed worse on C3 compared with Aβ− [unadjusted Cohen’s d=−0.22 (95%CI: −0.31,−0.13) p<0.001] and at a magnitude comparable to the PACC [d=−0.32 (95%CI: −0.41,−0.23) p<0.001]. Better C3 performance was observed in younger, more educated, and female participants. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide support for both the feasibility and validity of C3 and computerized cognitive outcomes more generally in AD secondary prevention trials. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7755110 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77551102021-01-01 The Computerized Cognitive Composite (C3) in A4, an Alzheimer’s Disease Secondary Prevention Trial Papp, K.V. Rentz, D.M. Maruff, P. Sun, C.-K. Raman, R. Donohue, M.C. Schembri, A. Stark, C. Yassa, M.A. Wessels, A.M. Yaari, R. Holdridge, K.C. Aisen, P.S. Sperling, R.A. J Prev Alzheimers Dis Article BACKGROUND: Computerized cognitive assessments may improve Alzheimer’s disease (AD) secondary prevention trial efficiency and accuracy. However, they require validation against standard outcomes and relevant biomarkers. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and validity of the tablet-based Computerized Cognitive Composite (C3). DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of cognitive screening data from the A4 study (Anti-Amyloid in Asymptomatic AD). SETTING: Multi-center international study. PARTICIPANTS: Clinically normal (CN) older adults (65–85; n=4486) MEASUREMENTS: Participants underwent florbetapir-Positron Emission Tomography for Aβ+/− classification. They completed the C3 and standard paper and pencil measures included in the Preclinical Alzheimer’s Cognitive Composite (PACC). The C3 combines memory measures sensitive to change over time (Cogstate Brief Battery-One Card Learning) and measures shown to be declining early in AD including pattern separation (Behavioral Pattern Separation Test- Object-Lure Discrimination Index) and associative memory (Face Name Associative Memory Exam- Face-Name Matching). C3 acceptability and completion rates were assessed using qualitative and quantitative methods. C3 performance was explored in relation to Aβ+/− groups (n=1323/3163) and PACC. RESULTS: C3 was feasible for CN older adults to complete. Rates of incomplete or invalid administrations were extremely low, even in the bottom quartile of cognitive performers (PACC). C3 was moderately correlated with PACC (r=0.39). Aβ+ performed worse on C3 compared with Aβ− [unadjusted Cohen’s d=−0.22 (95%CI: −0.31,−0.13) p<0.001] and at a magnitude comparable to the PACC [d=−0.32 (95%CI: −0.41,−0.23) p<0.001]. Better C3 performance was observed in younger, more educated, and female participants. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide support for both the feasibility and validity of C3 and computerized cognitive outcomes more generally in AD secondary prevention trials. 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7755110/ /pubmed/33336226 http://dx.doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2020.38 Text en Open Access: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Article Papp, K.V. Rentz, D.M. Maruff, P. Sun, C.-K. Raman, R. Donohue, M.C. Schembri, A. Stark, C. Yassa, M.A. Wessels, A.M. Yaari, R. Holdridge, K.C. Aisen, P.S. Sperling, R.A. The Computerized Cognitive Composite (C3) in A4, an Alzheimer’s Disease Secondary Prevention Trial |
title | The Computerized Cognitive Composite (C3) in A4, an Alzheimer’s Disease Secondary Prevention Trial |
title_full | The Computerized Cognitive Composite (C3) in A4, an Alzheimer’s Disease Secondary Prevention Trial |
title_fullStr | The Computerized Cognitive Composite (C3) in A4, an Alzheimer’s Disease Secondary Prevention Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | The Computerized Cognitive Composite (C3) in A4, an Alzheimer’s Disease Secondary Prevention Trial |
title_short | The Computerized Cognitive Composite (C3) in A4, an Alzheimer’s Disease Secondary Prevention Trial |
title_sort | computerized cognitive composite (c3) in a4, an alzheimer’s disease secondary prevention trial |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7755110/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33336226 http://dx.doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2020.38 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT pappkv thecomputerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial AT rentzdm thecomputerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial AT maruffp thecomputerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial AT sunck thecomputerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial AT ramanr thecomputerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial AT donohuemc thecomputerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial AT schembria thecomputerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial AT starkc thecomputerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial AT yassama thecomputerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial AT wesselsam thecomputerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial AT yaarir thecomputerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial AT holdridgekc thecomputerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial AT aisenps thecomputerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial AT sperlingra thecomputerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial AT pappkv computerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial AT rentzdm computerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial AT maruffp computerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial AT sunck computerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial AT ramanr computerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial AT donohuemc computerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial AT schembria computerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial AT starkc computerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial AT yassama computerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial AT wesselsam computerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial AT yaarir computerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial AT holdridgekc computerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial AT aisenps computerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial AT sperlingra computerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial |