Cargando…

The Computerized Cognitive Composite (C3) in A4, an Alzheimer’s Disease Secondary Prevention Trial

BACKGROUND: Computerized cognitive assessments may improve Alzheimer’s disease (AD) secondary prevention trial efficiency and accuracy. However, they require validation against standard outcomes and relevant biomarkers. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and validity of the tablet-based Computeriz...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Papp, K.V., Rentz, D.M., Maruff, P., Sun, C.-K., Raman, R., Donohue, M.C., Schembri, A., Stark, C., Yassa, M.A., Wessels, A.M., Yaari, R., Holdridge, K.C., Aisen, P.S., Sperling, R.A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7755110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33336226
http://dx.doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2020.38
_version_ 1783626302226432000
author Papp, K.V.
Rentz, D.M.
Maruff, P.
Sun, C.-K.
Raman, R.
Donohue, M.C.
Schembri, A.
Stark, C.
Yassa, M.A.
Wessels, A.M.
Yaari, R.
Holdridge, K.C.
Aisen, P.S.
Sperling, R.A.
author_facet Papp, K.V.
Rentz, D.M.
Maruff, P.
Sun, C.-K.
Raman, R.
Donohue, M.C.
Schembri, A.
Stark, C.
Yassa, M.A.
Wessels, A.M.
Yaari, R.
Holdridge, K.C.
Aisen, P.S.
Sperling, R.A.
author_sort Papp, K.V.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Computerized cognitive assessments may improve Alzheimer’s disease (AD) secondary prevention trial efficiency and accuracy. However, they require validation against standard outcomes and relevant biomarkers. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and validity of the tablet-based Computerized Cognitive Composite (C3). DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of cognitive screening data from the A4 study (Anti-Amyloid in Asymptomatic AD). SETTING: Multi-center international study. PARTICIPANTS: Clinically normal (CN) older adults (65–85; n=4486) MEASUREMENTS: Participants underwent florbetapir-Positron Emission Tomography for Aβ+/− classification. They completed the C3 and standard paper and pencil measures included in the Preclinical Alzheimer’s Cognitive Composite (PACC). The C3 combines memory measures sensitive to change over time (Cogstate Brief Battery-One Card Learning) and measures shown to be declining early in AD including pattern separation (Behavioral Pattern Separation Test- Object-Lure Discrimination Index) and associative memory (Face Name Associative Memory Exam- Face-Name Matching). C3 acceptability and completion rates were assessed using qualitative and quantitative methods. C3 performance was explored in relation to Aβ+/− groups (n=1323/3163) and PACC. RESULTS: C3 was feasible for CN older adults to complete. Rates of incomplete or invalid administrations were extremely low, even in the bottom quartile of cognitive performers (PACC). C3 was moderately correlated with PACC (r=0.39). Aβ+ performed worse on C3 compared with Aβ− [unadjusted Cohen’s d=−0.22 (95%CI: −0.31,−0.13) p<0.001] and at a magnitude comparable to the PACC [d=−0.32 (95%CI: −0.41,−0.23) p<0.001]. Better C3 performance was observed in younger, more educated, and female participants. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide support for both the feasibility and validity of C3 and computerized cognitive outcomes more generally in AD secondary prevention trials.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7755110
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77551102021-01-01 The Computerized Cognitive Composite (C3) in A4, an Alzheimer’s Disease Secondary Prevention Trial Papp, K.V. Rentz, D.M. Maruff, P. Sun, C.-K. Raman, R. Donohue, M.C. Schembri, A. Stark, C. Yassa, M.A. Wessels, A.M. Yaari, R. Holdridge, K.C. Aisen, P.S. Sperling, R.A. J Prev Alzheimers Dis Article BACKGROUND: Computerized cognitive assessments may improve Alzheimer’s disease (AD) secondary prevention trial efficiency and accuracy. However, they require validation against standard outcomes and relevant biomarkers. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and validity of the tablet-based Computerized Cognitive Composite (C3). DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis of cognitive screening data from the A4 study (Anti-Amyloid in Asymptomatic AD). SETTING: Multi-center international study. PARTICIPANTS: Clinically normal (CN) older adults (65–85; n=4486) MEASUREMENTS: Participants underwent florbetapir-Positron Emission Tomography for Aβ+/− classification. They completed the C3 and standard paper and pencil measures included in the Preclinical Alzheimer’s Cognitive Composite (PACC). The C3 combines memory measures sensitive to change over time (Cogstate Brief Battery-One Card Learning) and measures shown to be declining early in AD including pattern separation (Behavioral Pattern Separation Test- Object-Lure Discrimination Index) and associative memory (Face Name Associative Memory Exam- Face-Name Matching). C3 acceptability and completion rates were assessed using qualitative and quantitative methods. C3 performance was explored in relation to Aβ+/− groups (n=1323/3163) and PACC. RESULTS: C3 was feasible for CN older adults to complete. Rates of incomplete or invalid administrations were extremely low, even in the bottom quartile of cognitive performers (PACC). C3 was moderately correlated with PACC (r=0.39). Aβ+ performed worse on C3 compared with Aβ− [unadjusted Cohen’s d=−0.22 (95%CI: −0.31,−0.13) p<0.001] and at a magnitude comparable to the PACC [d=−0.32 (95%CI: −0.41,−0.23) p<0.001]. Better C3 performance was observed in younger, more educated, and female participants. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide support for both the feasibility and validity of C3 and computerized cognitive outcomes more generally in AD secondary prevention trials. 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7755110/ /pubmed/33336226 http://dx.doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2020.38 Text en Open Access: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, duplication, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Article
Papp, K.V.
Rentz, D.M.
Maruff, P.
Sun, C.-K.
Raman, R.
Donohue, M.C.
Schembri, A.
Stark, C.
Yassa, M.A.
Wessels, A.M.
Yaari, R.
Holdridge, K.C.
Aisen, P.S.
Sperling, R.A.
The Computerized Cognitive Composite (C3) in A4, an Alzheimer’s Disease Secondary Prevention Trial
title The Computerized Cognitive Composite (C3) in A4, an Alzheimer’s Disease Secondary Prevention Trial
title_full The Computerized Cognitive Composite (C3) in A4, an Alzheimer’s Disease Secondary Prevention Trial
title_fullStr The Computerized Cognitive Composite (C3) in A4, an Alzheimer’s Disease Secondary Prevention Trial
title_full_unstemmed The Computerized Cognitive Composite (C3) in A4, an Alzheimer’s Disease Secondary Prevention Trial
title_short The Computerized Cognitive Composite (C3) in A4, an Alzheimer’s Disease Secondary Prevention Trial
title_sort computerized cognitive composite (c3) in a4, an alzheimer’s disease secondary prevention trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7755110/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33336226
http://dx.doi.org/10.14283/jpad.2020.38
work_keys_str_mv AT pappkv thecomputerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial
AT rentzdm thecomputerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial
AT maruffp thecomputerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial
AT sunck thecomputerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial
AT ramanr thecomputerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial
AT donohuemc thecomputerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial
AT schembria thecomputerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial
AT starkc thecomputerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial
AT yassama thecomputerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial
AT wesselsam thecomputerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial
AT yaarir thecomputerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial
AT holdridgekc thecomputerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial
AT aisenps thecomputerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial
AT sperlingra thecomputerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial
AT pappkv computerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial
AT rentzdm computerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial
AT maruffp computerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial
AT sunck computerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial
AT ramanr computerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial
AT donohuemc computerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial
AT schembria computerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial
AT starkc computerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial
AT yassama computerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial
AT wesselsam computerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial
AT yaarir computerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial
AT holdridgekc computerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial
AT aisenps computerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial
AT sperlingra computerizedcognitivecompositec3ina4analzheimersdiseasesecondarypreventiontrial