Cargando…

Factors That Predict Biological Aggressiveness in Estrogen Receptor–Positive / Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative / Lymph Node–Negative Breast Cancer

Background: Traditionally, breast cancer is staged using TNM criteria: tumor size (T), nodal status (N), and metastasis (M). The Oncotype DX assay provides a recurrence score (RS) based on genomics that predicts the likelihood of distant recurrence in estrogen receptor–positive (ER+)/human epidermal...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arthur, Lauren E., McMann, Ashley H., Slattery, Lauren N., Fuhrman, George M., Mackey, Aimee M., Rivere, Amy E., Corsetti, Ralph L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7755554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33408575
http://dx.doi.org/10.31486/toj.20.0035
_version_ 1783626371657891840
author Arthur, Lauren E.
McMann, Ashley H.
Slattery, Lauren N.
Fuhrman, George M.
Mackey, Aimee M.
Rivere, Amy E.
Corsetti, Ralph L.
author_facet Arthur, Lauren E.
McMann, Ashley H.
Slattery, Lauren N.
Fuhrman, George M.
Mackey, Aimee M.
Rivere, Amy E.
Corsetti, Ralph L.
author_sort Arthur, Lauren E.
collection PubMed
description Background: Traditionally, breast cancer is staged using TNM criteria: tumor size (T), nodal status (N), and metastasis (M). The Oncotype DX assay provides a recurrence score (RS) based on genomics that predicts the likelihood of distant recurrence in estrogen receptor–positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2–)/lymph node–negative (LN–) tumors. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with ER+/HER2–/LN– breast cancer tumors who were evaluated between 2007 and 2017 with Oncotype DX RS. We compared the RS to tumor size, patient age, progesterone receptor (PR) status, and LN immunohistochemistry to assess for factors that may independently predict recurrence risk. We also compared tumor size to tumor grade. Results: The data set included 296 tumors: 248 ER+/PR-positive (PR+)/HER2– and 48 ER+/PR-negative (PR–)/HER2–. RS ranged from 0 to 66, patient age ranged from 33 to 77 years, and tumor size ranged from 1 to 65 mm. No significant correlation was found between age and RS (r=–0.073, P=0.208). PR– tumors had a significantly higher RS regardless of size (PR– mean RS 30.8 ± 12.7; PR+ mean RS 16.3 ± 7.3; t(53)=7.6, P<0.0001). No significant correlation was seen between tumor size and RS for all tumors (r=–0.028, P=0.635), and this finding remained true for the PR+ tumor subgroup (r=0.114, P=0.072). However, a significant negative correlation was seen between tumor size and RS in the PR– subgroup (r=–0.343, P=0.017). Further analysis to ensure that differences in tumor grade did not account for this correlation showed equal distribution of well differentiated, moderately differentiated, and poorly differentiated tumors with no significant correlation between tumor size and grade. Conclusion: Increasing tumor size may not be associated with increasing biological aggressiveness. Traditionally, smaller tumors are thought to be lower risk and larger tumors higher risk, with a tendency to use chemotherapy with large tumors. However, our data showed a negative correlation between tumor size and RS in the PR– subgroup. A tumor with PR negativity that reaches a large size without metastasizing may suggest a favorable tumor biology. These tumors may not receive as much benefit from chemotherapy as previously thought. Also, the higher RS seen in smaller PR– tumors may demonstrate PR– status as a predictor for higher risk of distant recurrence. We propose that all tumors meeting the ER+/PR–/LN– criteria, regardless of size, should be considered for genotyping, with the RS used to guide chemotherapy benefit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7755554
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77555542021-01-05 Factors That Predict Biological Aggressiveness in Estrogen Receptor–Positive / Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative / Lymph Node–Negative Breast Cancer Arthur, Lauren E. McMann, Ashley H. Slattery, Lauren N. Fuhrman, George M. Mackey, Aimee M. Rivere, Amy E. Corsetti, Ralph L. Ochsner J Original Research Background: Traditionally, breast cancer is staged using TNM criteria: tumor size (T), nodal status (N), and metastasis (M). The Oncotype DX assay provides a recurrence score (RS) based on genomics that predicts the likelihood of distant recurrence in estrogen receptor–positive (ER+)/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative (HER2–)/lymph node–negative (LN–) tumors. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients with ER+/HER2–/LN– breast cancer tumors who were evaluated between 2007 and 2017 with Oncotype DX RS. We compared the RS to tumor size, patient age, progesterone receptor (PR) status, and LN immunohistochemistry to assess for factors that may independently predict recurrence risk. We also compared tumor size to tumor grade. Results: The data set included 296 tumors: 248 ER+/PR-positive (PR+)/HER2– and 48 ER+/PR-negative (PR–)/HER2–. RS ranged from 0 to 66, patient age ranged from 33 to 77 years, and tumor size ranged from 1 to 65 mm. No significant correlation was found between age and RS (r=–0.073, P=0.208). PR– tumors had a significantly higher RS regardless of size (PR– mean RS 30.8 ± 12.7; PR+ mean RS 16.3 ± 7.3; t(53)=7.6, P<0.0001). No significant correlation was seen between tumor size and RS for all tumors (r=–0.028, P=0.635), and this finding remained true for the PR+ tumor subgroup (r=0.114, P=0.072). However, a significant negative correlation was seen between tumor size and RS in the PR– subgroup (r=–0.343, P=0.017). Further analysis to ensure that differences in tumor grade did not account for this correlation showed equal distribution of well differentiated, moderately differentiated, and poorly differentiated tumors with no significant correlation between tumor size and grade. Conclusion: Increasing tumor size may not be associated with increasing biological aggressiveness. Traditionally, smaller tumors are thought to be lower risk and larger tumors higher risk, with a tendency to use chemotherapy with large tumors. However, our data showed a negative correlation between tumor size and RS in the PR– subgroup. A tumor with PR negativity that reaches a large size without metastasizing may suggest a favorable tumor biology. These tumors may not receive as much benefit from chemotherapy as previously thought. Also, the higher RS seen in smaller PR– tumors may demonstrate PR– status as a predictor for higher risk of distant recurrence. We propose that all tumors meeting the ER+/PR–/LN– criteria, regardless of size, should be considered for genotyping, with the RS used to guide chemotherapy benefit. Academic Division of Ochsner Clinic Foundation 2020 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7755554/ /pubmed/33408575 http://dx.doi.org/10.31486/toj.20.0035 Text en ©2020 by the author(s); Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode ©2020 by the author(s); licensee Ochsner Journal, Ochsner Clinic Foundation, New Orleans, LA. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode) that permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Arthur, Lauren E.
McMann, Ashley H.
Slattery, Lauren N.
Fuhrman, George M.
Mackey, Aimee M.
Rivere, Amy E.
Corsetti, Ralph L.
Factors That Predict Biological Aggressiveness in Estrogen Receptor–Positive / Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative / Lymph Node–Negative Breast Cancer
title Factors That Predict Biological Aggressiveness in Estrogen Receptor–Positive / Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative / Lymph Node–Negative Breast Cancer
title_full Factors That Predict Biological Aggressiveness in Estrogen Receptor–Positive / Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative / Lymph Node–Negative Breast Cancer
title_fullStr Factors That Predict Biological Aggressiveness in Estrogen Receptor–Positive / Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative / Lymph Node–Negative Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Factors That Predict Biological Aggressiveness in Estrogen Receptor–Positive / Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative / Lymph Node–Negative Breast Cancer
title_short Factors That Predict Biological Aggressiveness in Estrogen Receptor–Positive / Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2–Negative / Lymph Node–Negative Breast Cancer
title_sort factors that predict biological aggressiveness in estrogen receptor–positive / human epidermal growth factor receptor 2–negative / lymph node–negative breast cancer
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7755554/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33408575
http://dx.doi.org/10.31486/toj.20.0035
work_keys_str_mv AT arthurlaurene factorsthatpredictbiologicalaggressivenessinestrogenreceptorpositivehumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2negativelymphnodenegativebreastcancer
AT mcmannashleyh factorsthatpredictbiologicalaggressivenessinestrogenreceptorpositivehumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2negativelymphnodenegativebreastcancer
AT slatterylaurenn factorsthatpredictbiologicalaggressivenessinestrogenreceptorpositivehumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2negativelymphnodenegativebreastcancer
AT fuhrmangeorgem factorsthatpredictbiologicalaggressivenessinestrogenreceptorpositivehumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2negativelymphnodenegativebreastcancer
AT mackeyaimeem factorsthatpredictbiologicalaggressivenessinestrogenreceptorpositivehumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2negativelymphnodenegativebreastcancer
AT rivereamye factorsthatpredictbiologicalaggressivenessinestrogenreceptorpositivehumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2negativelymphnodenegativebreastcancer
AT corsettiralphl factorsthatpredictbiologicalaggressivenessinestrogenreceptorpositivehumanepidermalgrowthfactorreceptor2negativelymphnodenegativebreastcancer