Cargando…
Dynamic emotional expressions do not modulate responses to gestures
The tendency to imitate the actions of others appears to be a fundamental aspect of human social interaction. Emotional expressions are a particularly salient form of social stimuli (Vuilleumier & Schwartz, 2001) but their relationship to imitative behaviour is currently unclear. In this paper w...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
North Holland Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7755647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33310344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103226 |
_version_ | 1783626393337200640 |
---|---|
author | Farmer, Harry Mahmood, Raqeeb Gregory, Samantha E.A. Tishina, Polina Hamilton, Antonia F. de C. |
author_facet | Farmer, Harry Mahmood, Raqeeb Gregory, Samantha E.A. Tishina, Polina Hamilton, Antonia F. de C. |
author_sort | Farmer, Harry |
collection | PubMed |
description | The tendency to imitate the actions of others appears to be a fundamental aspect of human social interaction. Emotional expressions are a particularly salient form of social stimuli (Vuilleumier & Schwartz, 2001) but their relationship to imitative behaviour is currently unclear. In this paper we report the results of five studies which investigated the effect of a target's dynamic emotional stimuli on participants' tendency to respond compatibly to the target's actions. Experiment one examined the effect of dynamic emotional expressions on the automatic imitation of opening and closing hand movements. Experiment two used the same basic paradigm but added gaze direction as an additional factor. Experiment three investigated the effect of dynamic emotional expressions on compatibility responses to handshakes. Experiment four investigated whether dynamic emotional expressions modulated response to valenced social gestures. Finally, experiment five compared the effects of dynamic and static emotional expressions on participants' automatic imitation of finger lifting. Across all five studies we reliably elicited a compatibility effect however, none of the studies found a significant modulating effect of emotional expression. This null effect was also supported by a random effects meta-analysis and a series of Bayesian t-tests. Nevertheless, these results must be caveated by the fact that our studies had limited power to detect effect sizes below d = 0.4. We conclude by situating our findings within the literature, suggesting that the effect of emotional expressions on automatic imitation is, at best, minimal. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7755647 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | North Holland Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77556472021-01-01 Dynamic emotional expressions do not modulate responses to gestures Farmer, Harry Mahmood, Raqeeb Gregory, Samantha E.A. Tishina, Polina Hamilton, Antonia F. de C. Acta Psychol (Amst) Article The tendency to imitate the actions of others appears to be a fundamental aspect of human social interaction. Emotional expressions are a particularly salient form of social stimuli (Vuilleumier & Schwartz, 2001) but their relationship to imitative behaviour is currently unclear. In this paper we report the results of five studies which investigated the effect of a target's dynamic emotional stimuli on participants' tendency to respond compatibly to the target's actions. Experiment one examined the effect of dynamic emotional expressions on the automatic imitation of opening and closing hand movements. Experiment two used the same basic paradigm but added gaze direction as an additional factor. Experiment three investigated the effect of dynamic emotional expressions on compatibility responses to handshakes. Experiment four investigated whether dynamic emotional expressions modulated response to valenced social gestures. Finally, experiment five compared the effects of dynamic and static emotional expressions on participants' automatic imitation of finger lifting. Across all five studies we reliably elicited a compatibility effect however, none of the studies found a significant modulating effect of emotional expression. This null effect was also supported by a random effects meta-analysis and a series of Bayesian t-tests. Nevertheless, these results must be caveated by the fact that our studies had limited power to detect effect sizes below d = 0.4. We conclude by situating our findings within the literature, suggesting that the effect of emotional expressions on automatic imitation is, at best, minimal. North Holland Publishing 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7755647/ /pubmed/33310344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103226 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Farmer, Harry Mahmood, Raqeeb Gregory, Samantha E.A. Tishina, Polina Hamilton, Antonia F. de C. Dynamic emotional expressions do not modulate responses to gestures |
title | Dynamic emotional expressions do not modulate responses to gestures |
title_full | Dynamic emotional expressions do not modulate responses to gestures |
title_fullStr | Dynamic emotional expressions do not modulate responses to gestures |
title_full_unstemmed | Dynamic emotional expressions do not modulate responses to gestures |
title_short | Dynamic emotional expressions do not modulate responses to gestures |
title_sort | dynamic emotional expressions do not modulate responses to gestures |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7755647/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33310344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103226 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT farmerharry dynamicemotionalexpressionsdonotmodulateresponsestogestures AT mahmoodraqeeb dynamicemotionalexpressionsdonotmodulateresponsestogestures AT gregorysamanthaea dynamicemotionalexpressionsdonotmodulateresponsestogestures AT tishinapolina dynamicemotionalexpressionsdonotmodulateresponsestogestures AT hamiltonantoniafdec dynamicemotionalexpressionsdonotmodulateresponsestogestures |