Cargando…

Dynamic emotional expressions do not modulate responses to gestures

The tendency to imitate the actions of others appears to be a fundamental aspect of human social interaction. Emotional expressions are a particularly salient form of social stimuli (Vuilleumier & Schwartz, 2001) but their relationship to imitative behaviour is currently unclear. In this paper w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Farmer, Harry, Mahmood, Raqeeb, Gregory, Samantha E.A., Tishina, Polina, Hamilton, Antonia F. de C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: North Holland Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7755647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33310344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103226
_version_ 1783626393337200640
author Farmer, Harry
Mahmood, Raqeeb
Gregory, Samantha E.A.
Tishina, Polina
Hamilton, Antonia F. de C.
author_facet Farmer, Harry
Mahmood, Raqeeb
Gregory, Samantha E.A.
Tishina, Polina
Hamilton, Antonia F. de C.
author_sort Farmer, Harry
collection PubMed
description The tendency to imitate the actions of others appears to be a fundamental aspect of human social interaction. Emotional expressions are a particularly salient form of social stimuli (Vuilleumier & Schwartz, 2001) but their relationship to imitative behaviour is currently unclear. In this paper we report the results of five studies which investigated the effect of a target's dynamic emotional stimuli on participants' tendency to respond compatibly to the target's actions. Experiment one examined the effect of dynamic emotional expressions on the automatic imitation of opening and closing hand movements. Experiment two used the same basic paradigm but added gaze direction as an additional factor. Experiment three investigated the effect of dynamic emotional expressions on compatibility responses to handshakes. Experiment four investigated whether dynamic emotional expressions modulated response to valenced social gestures. Finally, experiment five compared the effects of dynamic and static emotional expressions on participants' automatic imitation of finger lifting. Across all five studies we reliably elicited a compatibility effect however, none of the studies found a significant modulating effect of emotional expression. This null effect was also supported by a random effects meta-analysis and a series of Bayesian t-tests. Nevertheless, these results must be caveated by the fact that our studies had limited power to detect effect sizes below d = 0.4. We conclude by situating our findings within the literature, suggesting that the effect of emotional expressions on automatic imitation is, at best, minimal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7755647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher North Holland Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77556472021-01-01 Dynamic emotional expressions do not modulate responses to gestures Farmer, Harry Mahmood, Raqeeb Gregory, Samantha E.A. Tishina, Polina Hamilton, Antonia F. de C. Acta Psychol (Amst) Article The tendency to imitate the actions of others appears to be a fundamental aspect of human social interaction. Emotional expressions are a particularly salient form of social stimuli (Vuilleumier & Schwartz, 2001) but their relationship to imitative behaviour is currently unclear. In this paper we report the results of five studies which investigated the effect of a target's dynamic emotional stimuli on participants' tendency to respond compatibly to the target's actions. Experiment one examined the effect of dynamic emotional expressions on the automatic imitation of opening and closing hand movements. Experiment two used the same basic paradigm but added gaze direction as an additional factor. Experiment three investigated the effect of dynamic emotional expressions on compatibility responses to handshakes. Experiment four investigated whether dynamic emotional expressions modulated response to valenced social gestures. Finally, experiment five compared the effects of dynamic and static emotional expressions on participants' automatic imitation of finger lifting. Across all five studies we reliably elicited a compatibility effect however, none of the studies found a significant modulating effect of emotional expression. This null effect was also supported by a random effects meta-analysis and a series of Bayesian t-tests. Nevertheless, these results must be caveated by the fact that our studies had limited power to detect effect sizes below d = 0.4. We conclude by situating our findings within the literature, suggesting that the effect of emotional expressions on automatic imitation is, at best, minimal. North Holland Publishing 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7755647/ /pubmed/33310344 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103226 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Farmer, Harry
Mahmood, Raqeeb
Gregory, Samantha E.A.
Tishina, Polina
Hamilton, Antonia F. de C.
Dynamic emotional expressions do not modulate responses to gestures
title Dynamic emotional expressions do not modulate responses to gestures
title_full Dynamic emotional expressions do not modulate responses to gestures
title_fullStr Dynamic emotional expressions do not modulate responses to gestures
title_full_unstemmed Dynamic emotional expressions do not modulate responses to gestures
title_short Dynamic emotional expressions do not modulate responses to gestures
title_sort dynamic emotional expressions do not modulate responses to gestures
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7755647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33310344
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103226
work_keys_str_mv AT farmerharry dynamicemotionalexpressionsdonotmodulateresponsestogestures
AT mahmoodraqeeb dynamicemotionalexpressionsdonotmodulateresponsestogestures
AT gregorysamanthaea dynamicemotionalexpressionsdonotmodulateresponsestogestures
AT tishinapolina dynamicemotionalexpressionsdonotmodulateresponsestogestures
AT hamiltonantoniafdec dynamicemotionalexpressionsdonotmodulateresponsestogestures