Cargando…
The difference between karyotype analysis and chromosome microarray for mosaicism of aneuploid chromosomes in prenatal diagnosis
OBJECTIVE: To compare karyotype and chromosomal microarray (CMA) analysis of aneuploid chromosome mosaicism in amniocentesis samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 2091 amniocentesis samples from pregnant women were collected from March 1, 2019, to January 31, 2020. Karyotype analysis was perfor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7755766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32864771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23514 |
_version_ | 1783626405345492992 |
---|---|
author | Hao, MengZhe Li, LeiLei Zhang, Han Li, LinLin Liu, Ruizhi Yu, Yang |
author_facet | Hao, MengZhe Li, LeiLei Zhang, Han Li, LinLin Liu, Ruizhi Yu, Yang |
author_sort | Hao, MengZhe |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To compare karyotype and chromosomal microarray (CMA) analysis of aneuploid chromosome mosaicism in amniocentesis samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 2091 amniocentesis samples from pregnant women were collected from March 1, 2019, to January 31, 2020. Karyotype analysis was performed using G‐banding and CMA analysis used the Affymetrix CytoScan 750K SNP microarray. RESULT: Thirteen cases with aneuploid chromosome mosaicism were detected and compared between the karyotype and CMA methods. Seven of these cases were trisomic mosaicism, and the levels of mosaicism calculated from CMA were higher than those detected from karyotype analysis; noting three cases of trisomy mosaicism were not detected by karyotype analysis. Four cases exhibited monomeric mosaicism, and the levels of mosaicism detected in three of these cases were higher in karyotype compared with CMA analysis; one case had equivalent levels of monomeric mosaicism from both karyotype and CMA analysis. Two other cases from karyotype analysis were a mix of monosomic and trisomic mosaicism, whereas the CMA result was restricted to monosomic mosaicism for these cases. CONCLUSION: Both karyotype and CMA analysis can be used to detect aneuploid chromosome mosaicism. However, the two methods produced different results. CMA and karyotype analysis have their own advantages in detecting aneuploid mosaicism, and the combination of these methods provides a more rigorous diagnosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7755766 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77557662020-12-23 The difference between karyotype analysis and chromosome microarray for mosaicism of aneuploid chromosomes in prenatal diagnosis Hao, MengZhe Li, LeiLei Zhang, Han Li, LinLin Liu, Ruizhi Yu, Yang J Clin Lab Anal Case Reports OBJECTIVE: To compare karyotype and chromosomal microarray (CMA) analysis of aneuploid chromosome mosaicism in amniocentesis samples. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 2091 amniocentesis samples from pregnant women were collected from March 1, 2019, to January 31, 2020. Karyotype analysis was performed using G‐banding and CMA analysis used the Affymetrix CytoScan 750K SNP microarray. RESULT: Thirteen cases with aneuploid chromosome mosaicism were detected and compared between the karyotype and CMA methods. Seven of these cases were trisomic mosaicism, and the levels of mosaicism calculated from CMA were higher than those detected from karyotype analysis; noting three cases of trisomy mosaicism were not detected by karyotype analysis. Four cases exhibited monomeric mosaicism, and the levels of mosaicism detected in three of these cases were higher in karyotype compared with CMA analysis; one case had equivalent levels of monomeric mosaicism from both karyotype and CMA analysis. Two other cases from karyotype analysis were a mix of monosomic and trisomic mosaicism, whereas the CMA result was restricted to monosomic mosaicism for these cases. CONCLUSION: Both karyotype and CMA analysis can be used to detect aneuploid chromosome mosaicism. However, the two methods produced different results. CMA and karyotype analysis have their own advantages in detecting aneuploid mosaicism, and the combination of these methods provides a more rigorous diagnosis. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7755766/ /pubmed/32864771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23514 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis Published by Wiley Periodicals LLC This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Case Reports Hao, MengZhe Li, LeiLei Zhang, Han Li, LinLin Liu, Ruizhi Yu, Yang The difference between karyotype analysis and chromosome microarray for mosaicism of aneuploid chromosomes in prenatal diagnosis |
title | The difference between karyotype analysis and chromosome microarray for mosaicism of aneuploid chromosomes in prenatal diagnosis |
title_full | The difference between karyotype analysis and chromosome microarray for mosaicism of aneuploid chromosomes in prenatal diagnosis |
title_fullStr | The difference between karyotype analysis and chromosome microarray for mosaicism of aneuploid chromosomes in prenatal diagnosis |
title_full_unstemmed | The difference between karyotype analysis and chromosome microarray for mosaicism of aneuploid chromosomes in prenatal diagnosis |
title_short | The difference between karyotype analysis and chromosome microarray for mosaicism of aneuploid chromosomes in prenatal diagnosis |
title_sort | difference between karyotype analysis and chromosome microarray for mosaicism of aneuploid chromosomes in prenatal diagnosis |
topic | Case Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7755766/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32864771 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23514 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT haomengzhe thedifferencebetweenkaryotypeanalysisandchromosomemicroarrayformosaicismofaneuploidchromosomesinprenataldiagnosis AT lileilei thedifferencebetweenkaryotypeanalysisandchromosomemicroarrayformosaicismofaneuploidchromosomesinprenataldiagnosis AT zhanghan thedifferencebetweenkaryotypeanalysisandchromosomemicroarrayformosaicismofaneuploidchromosomesinprenataldiagnosis AT lilinlin thedifferencebetweenkaryotypeanalysisandchromosomemicroarrayformosaicismofaneuploidchromosomesinprenataldiagnosis AT liuruizhi thedifferencebetweenkaryotypeanalysisandchromosomemicroarrayformosaicismofaneuploidchromosomesinprenataldiagnosis AT yuyang thedifferencebetweenkaryotypeanalysisandchromosomemicroarrayformosaicismofaneuploidchromosomesinprenataldiagnosis AT haomengzhe differencebetweenkaryotypeanalysisandchromosomemicroarrayformosaicismofaneuploidchromosomesinprenataldiagnosis AT lileilei differencebetweenkaryotypeanalysisandchromosomemicroarrayformosaicismofaneuploidchromosomesinprenataldiagnosis AT zhanghan differencebetweenkaryotypeanalysisandchromosomemicroarrayformosaicismofaneuploidchromosomesinprenataldiagnosis AT lilinlin differencebetweenkaryotypeanalysisandchromosomemicroarrayformosaicismofaneuploidchromosomesinprenataldiagnosis AT liuruizhi differencebetweenkaryotypeanalysisandchromosomemicroarrayformosaicismofaneuploidchromosomesinprenataldiagnosis AT yuyang differencebetweenkaryotypeanalysisandchromosomemicroarrayformosaicismofaneuploidchromosomesinprenataldiagnosis |