Cargando…

A low‐cost pipeline for soil microbiome profiling

Common bottlenecks in environmental and crop microbiome studies are the consumable and personnel costs necessary for genomic DNA extraction and sequencing library construction. This is harder for challenging environmental samples such as soil, which is rich in Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) inhibit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bollmann‐Giolai, Anita, Giolai, Michael, Heavens, Darren, Macaulay, Iain, Malone, Jacob, Clark, Matthew D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7755778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33225533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.1133
_version_ 1783626408250048512
author Bollmann‐Giolai, Anita
Giolai, Michael
Heavens, Darren
Macaulay, Iain
Malone, Jacob
Clark, Matthew D.
author_facet Bollmann‐Giolai, Anita
Giolai, Michael
Heavens, Darren
Macaulay, Iain
Malone, Jacob
Clark, Matthew D.
author_sort Bollmann‐Giolai, Anita
collection PubMed
description Common bottlenecks in environmental and crop microbiome studies are the consumable and personnel costs necessary for genomic DNA extraction and sequencing library construction. This is harder for challenging environmental samples such as soil, which is rich in Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) inhibitors. To address this, we have established a low‐cost genomic DNA extraction method for soil samples. We also present an Illumina‐compatible 16S and ITS rRNA gene amplicon library preparation workflow that uses common laboratory equipment. We evaluated the performance of our genomic DNA extraction method against two leading commercial soil genomic DNA kits (MoBio PowerSoil® and MP Biomedicals™ FastDNA™ SPIN) and a recently published non‐commercial extraction method by Zou et al. (PLoS Biology, 15, e2003916, 2017). Our benchmarking experiment used four different soil types (coniferous, broad‐leafed, and mixed forest plus a standardized cereal crop compost mix) assessing the quality and quantity of the extracted genomic DNA by analyzing sequence variants of 16S V4 and ITS rRNA amplicons. We found that our genomic DNA extraction method compares well to both commercially available genomic DNA extraction kits in DNA quality and quantity. The MoBio PowerSoil® kit, which relies on silica column‐based DNA extraction with extensive washing, delivered the cleanest genomic DNA, for example, best A260:A280 and A260:A230 absorbance ratios. The MP Biomedicals™ FastDNA™ SPIN kit, which uses a large amount of binding material, yielded the most genomic DNA. Our method fits between the two commercial kits, producing both good yields and clean genomic DNA with fragment sizes of approximately 10 kb. Comparative analysis of detected amplicon sequence variants shows that our method correlates well with the two commercial kits. Here, we present a low‐cost genomic DNA extraction method for soil samples that can be coupled to an Illumina‐compatible simple two‐step amplicon library construction workflow for 16S V4 and ITS marker genes. Our method delivers high‐quality genomic DNA at a fraction of the cost of commercial kits and enables cost‐effective, large‐scale amplicon sequencing projects. Notably, our extracted gDNA molecules are long enough to be suitable for downstream techniques such as full gene sequencing or even metagenomics shotgun approaches using long reads (PacBio or Nanopore), 10x Genomics linked reads, and Dovetail genomics.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7755778
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77557782020-12-23 A low‐cost pipeline for soil microbiome profiling Bollmann‐Giolai, Anita Giolai, Michael Heavens, Darren Macaulay, Iain Malone, Jacob Clark, Matthew D. Microbiologyopen Original Articles Common bottlenecks in environmental and crop microbiome studies are the consumable and personnel costs necessary for genomic DNA extraction and sequencing library construction. This is harder for challenging environmental samples such as soil, which is rich in Polymerase Chain Reaction (PCR) inhibitors. To address this, we have established a low‐cost genomic DNA extraction method for soil samples. We also present an Illumina‐compatible 16S and ITS rRNA gene amplicon library preparation workflow that uses common laboratory equipment. We evaluated the performance of our genomic DNA extraction method against two leading commercial soil genomic DNA kits (MoBio PowerSoil® and MP Biomedicals™ FastDNA™ SPIN) and a recently published non‐commercial extraction method by Zou et al. (PLoS Biology, 15, e2003916, 2017). Our benchmarking experiment used four different soil types (coniferous, broad‐leafed, and mixed forest plus a standardized cereal crop compost mix) assessing the quality and quantity of the extracted genomic DNA by analyzing sequence variants of 16S V4 and ITS rRNA amplicons. We found that our genomic DNA extraction method compares well to both commercially available genomic DNA extraction kits in DNA quality and quantity. The MoBio PowerSoil® kit, which relies on silica column‐based DNA extraction with extensive washing, delivered the cleanest genomic DNA, for example, best A260:A280 and A260:A230 absorbance ratios. The MP Biomedicals™ FastDNA™ SPIN kit, which uses a large amount of binding material, yielded the most genomic DNA. Our method fits between the two commercial kits, producing both good yields and clean genomic DNA with fragment sizes of approximately 10 kb. Comparative analysis of detected amplicon sequence variants shows that our method correlates well with the two commercial kits. Here, we present a low‐cost genomic DNA extraction method for soil samples that can be coupled to an Illumina‐compatible simple two‐step amplicon library construction workflow for 16S V4 and ITS marker genes. Our method delivers high‐quality genomic DNA at a fraction of the cost of commercial kits and enables cost‐effective, large‐scale amplicon sequencing projects. Notably, our extracted gDNA molecules are long enough to be suitable for downstream techniques such as full gene sequencing or even metagenomics shotgun approaches using long reads (PacBio or Nanopore), 10x Genomics linked reads, and Dovetail genomics. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7755778/ /pubmed/33225533 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.1133 Text en © 2020 The Authors. MicrobiologyOpen published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Bollmann‐Giolai, Anita
Giolai, Michael
Heavens, Darren
Macaulay, Iain
Malone, Jacob
Clark, Matthew D.
A low‐cost pipeline for soil microbiome profiling
title A low‐cost pipeline for soil microbiome profiling
title_full A low‐cost pipeline for soil microbiome profiling
title_fullStr A low‐cost pipeline for soil microbiome profiling
title_full_unstemmed A low‐cost pipeline for soil microbiome profiling
title_short A low‐cost pipeline for soil microbiome profiling
title_sort low‐cost pipeline for soil microbiome profiling
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7755778/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33225533
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/mbo3.1133
work_keys_str_mv AT bollmanngiolaianita alowcostpipelineforsoilmicrobiomeprofiling
AT giolaimichael alowcostpipelineforsoilmicrobiomeprofiling
AT heavensdarren alowcostpipelineforsoilmicrobiomeprofiling
AT macaulayiain alowcostpipelineforsoilmicrobiomeprofiling
AT malonejacob alowcostpipelineforsoilmicrobiomeprofiling
AT clarkmatthewd alowcostpipelineforsoilmicrobiomeprofiling
AT bollmanngiolaianita lowcostpipelineforsoilmicrobiomeprofiling
AT giolaimichael lowcostpipelineforsoilmicrobiomeprofiling
AT heavensdarren lowcostpipelineforsoilmicrobiomeprofiling
AT macaulayiain lowcostpipelineforsoilmicrobiomeprofiling
AT malonejacob lowcostpipelineforsoilmicrobiomeprofiling
AT clarkmatthewd lowcostpipelineforsoilmicrobiomeprofiling