Cargando…

Application and optimization of reference change values for Delta Checks in clinical laboratory

BACKGROUND: Delta check is a patient‐based QC tool for detecting errors by comparing current and previous test results of patient. Reference change value (RCV) is adopted in guidelines as method for delta check, but the performance is not verified. We applied RCV‐based delta check method to patients...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hong, Jinyoung, Cho, Eun‐Jung, Kim, Hyun‐Ki, Lee, Woochang, Chun, Sail, Min, Won‐Ki
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7755783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32862477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23550
_version_ 1783626409448570880
author Hong, Jinyoung
Cho, Eun‐Jung
Kim, Hyun‐Ki
Lee, Woochang
Chun, Sail
Min, Won‐Ki
author_facet Hong, Jinyoung
Cho, Eun‐Jung
Kim, Hyun‐Ki
Lee, Woochang
Chun, Sail
Min, Won‐Ki
author_sort Hong, Jinyoung
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Delta check is a patient‐based QC tool for detecting errors by comparing current and previous test results of patient. Reference change value (RCV) is adopted in guidelines as method for delta check, but the performance is not verified. We applied RCV‐based delta check method to patients' data and modified for application. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Reference change value were calculated using results of internal QC materials and biological variation data. Test results of 17 analytes in inpatients, outpatients, and health examination recipients were collected. The detection rates of currently used delta check method and those of RCV‐based method were compared, and the methods were modified. RESULTS: Reference change value‐based method had higher detection rates compared to conventional method. Applied modifications reduced detection rates. Removing the pairs of results within reference interval reduced detection rates (0.42% ~ 10.92%). When RCV was divided by time interval, the detection rates were similar to prior rates in outpatients (0.19% ~ 1.34%). Using RCV multiplied by twice the upper limit of reference value as cutoff reduced the detection rate (0.07% ~ 1.58%). CONCLUSIONS: Reference change value is a robust criterion for delta check and included in clinical laboratory practice guideline. However, RCV‐based method generates high detection rates which increase workload. It needs modification for use in clinical laboratories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7755783
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77557832020-12-23 Application and optimization of reference change values for Delta Checks in clinical laboratory Hong, Jinyoung Cho, Eun‐Jung Kim, Hyun‐Ki Lee, Woochang Chun, Sail Min, Won‐Ki J Clin Lab Anal Research Articles BACKGROUND: Delta check is a patient‐based QC tool for detecting errors by comparing current and previous test results of patient. Reference change value (RCV) is adopted in guidelines as method for delta check, but the performance is not verified. We applied RCV‐based delta check method to patients' data and modified for application. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Reference change value were calculated using results of internal QC materials and biological variation data. Test results of 17 analytes in inpatients, outpatients, and health examination recipients were collected. The detection rates of currently used delta check method and those of RCV‐based method were compared, and the methods were modified. RESULTS: Reference change value‐based method had higher detection rates compared to conventional method. Applied modifications reduced detection rates. Removing the pairs of results within reference interval reduced detection rates (0.42% ~ 10.92%). When RCV was divided by time interval, the detection rates were similar to prior rates in outpatients (0.19% ~ 1.34%). Using RCV multiplied by twice the upper limit of reference value as cutoff reduced the detection rate (0.07% ~ 1.58%). CONCLUSIONS: Reference change value is a robust criterion for delta check and included in clinical laboratory practice guideline. However, RCV‐based method generates high detection rates which increase workload. It needs modification for use in clinical laboratories. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7755783/ /pubmed/32862477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23550 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Hong, Jinyoung
Cho, Eun‐Jung
Kim, Hyun‐Ki
Lee, Woochang
Chun, Sail
Min, Won‐Ki
Application and optimization of reference change values for Delta Checks in clinical laboratory
title Application and optimization of reference change values for Delta Checks in clinical laboratory
title_full Application and optimization of reference change values for Delta Checks in clinical laboratory
title_fullStr Application and optimization of reference change values for Delta Checks in clinical laboratory
title_full_unstemmed Application and optimization of reference change values for Delta Checks in clinical laboratory
title_short Application and optimization of reference change values for Delta Checks in clinical laboratory
title_sort application and optimization of reference change values for delta checks in clinical laboratory
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7755783/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32862477
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23550
work_keys_str_mv AT hongjinyoung applicationandoptimizationofreferencechangevaluesfordeltachecksinclinicallaboratory
AT choeunjung applicationandoptimizationofreferencechangevaluesfordeltachecksinclinicallaboratory
AT kimhyunki applicationandoptimizationofreferencechangevaluesfordeltachecksinclinicallaboratory
AT leewoochang applicationandoptimizationofreferencechangevaluesfordeltachecksinclinicallaboratory
AT chunsail applicationandoptimizationofreferencechangevaluesfordeltachecksinclinicallaboratory
AT minwonki applicationandoptimizationofreferencechangevaluesfordeltachecksinclinicallaboratory