Cargando…
Application and optimization of reference change values for Delta Checks in clinical laboratory
BACKGROUND: Delta check is a patient‐based QC tool for detecting errors by comparing current and previous test results of patient. Reference change value (RCV) is adopted in guidelines as method for delta check, but the performance is not verified. We applied RCV‐based delta check method to patients...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7755783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32862477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23550 |
_version_ | 1783626409448570880 |
---|---|
author | Hong, Jinyoung Cho, Eun‐Jung Kim, Hyun‐Ki Lee, Woochang Chun, Sail Min, Won‐Ki |
author_facet | Hong, Jinyoung Cho, Eun‐Jung Kim, Hyun‐Ki Lee, Woochang Chun, Sail Min, Won‐Ki |
author_sort | Hong, Jinyoung |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Delta check is a patient‐based QC tool for detecting errors by comparing current and previous test results of patient. Reference change value (RCV) is adopted in guidelines as method for delta check, but the performance is not verified. We applied RCV‐based delta check method to patients' data and modified for application. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Reference change value were calculated using results of internal QC materials and biological variation data. Test results of 17 analytes in inpatients, outpatients, and health examination recipients were collected. The detection rates of currently used delta check method and those of RCV‐based method were compared, and the methods were modified. RESULTS: Reference change value‐based method had higher detection rates compared to conventional method. Applied modifications reduced detection rates. Removing the pairs of results within reference interval reduced detection rates (0.42% ~ 10.92%). When RCV was divided by time interval, the detection rates were similar to prior rates in outpatients (0.19% ~ 1.34%). Using RCV multiplied by twice the upper limit of reference value as cutoff reduced the detection rate (0.07% ~ 1.58%). CONCLUSIONS: Reference change value is a robust criterion for delta check and included in clinical laboratory practice guideline. However, RCV‐based method generates high detection rates which increase workload. It needs modification for use in clinical laboratories. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7755783 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77557832020-12-23 Application and optimization of reference change values for Delta Checks in clinical laboratory Hong, Jinyoung Cho, Eun‐Jung Kim, Hyun‐Ki Lee, Woochang Chun, Sail Min, Won‐Ki J Clin Lab Anal Research Articles BACKGROUND: Delta check is a patient‐based QC tool for detecting errors by comparing current and previous test results of patient. Reference change value (RCV) is adopted in guidelines as method for delta check, but the performance is not verified. We applied RCV‐based delta check method to patients' data and modified for application. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Reference change value were calculated using results of internal QC materials and biological variation data. Test results of 17 analytes in inpatients, outpatients, and health examination recipients were collected. The detection rates of currently used delta check method and those of RCV‐based method were compared, and the methods were modified. RESULTS: Reference change value‐based method had higher detection rates compared to conventional method. Applied modifications reduced detection rates. Removing the pairs of results within reference interval reduced detection rates (0.42% ~ 10.92%). When RCV was divided by time interval, the detection rates were similar to prior rates in outpatients (0.19% ~ 1.34%). Using RCV multiplied by twice the upper limit of reference value as cutoff reduced the detection rate (0.07% ~ 1.58%). CONCLUSIONS: Reference change value is a robust criterion for delta check and included in clinical laboratory practice guideline. However, RCV‐based method generates high detection rates which increase workload. It needs modification for use in clinical laboratories. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-08-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7755783/ /pubmed/32862477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23550 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Articles Hong, Jinyoung Cho, Eun‐Jung Kim, Hyun‐Ki Lee, Woochang Chun, Sail Min, Won‐Ki Application and optimization of reference change values for Delta Checks in clinical laboratory |
title | Application and optimization of reference change values for Delta Checks in clinical laboratory |
title_full | Application and optimization of reference change values for Delta Checks in clinical laboratory |
title_fullStr | Application and optimization of reference change values for Delta Checks in clinical laboratory |
title_full_unstemmed | Application and optimization of reference change values for Delta Checks in clinical laboratory |
title_short | Application and optimization of reference change values for Delta Checks in clinical laboratory |
title_sort | application and optimization of reference change values for delta checks in clinical laboratory |
topic | Research Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7755783/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32862477 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcla.23550 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hongjinyoung applicationandoptimizationofreferencechangevaluesfordeltachecksinclinicallaboratory AT choeunjung applicationandoptimizationofreferencechangevaluesfordeltachecksinclinicallaboratory AT kimhyunki applicationandoptimizationofreferencechangevaluesfordeltachecksinclinicallaboratory AT leewoochang applicationandoptimizationofreferencechangevaluesfordeltachecksinclinicallaboratory AT chunsail applicationandoptimizationofreferencechangevaluesfordeltachecksinclinicallaboratory AT minwonki applicationandoptimizationofreferencechangevaluesfordeltachecksinclinicallaboratory |