Cargando…

Comparison of Density Functional and Correlated Wave Function Methods for the Prediction of Cu(II) Hyperfine Coupling Constants

The reliable prediction of Cu(II) hyperfine coupling constants remains a challenge for quantum chemistry. Until recently only density functional theory (DFT) could target this property for systems of realistic size. However, wave function based methods become increasingly applicable. In the present...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gómez‐Piñeiro, Rogelio J., Pantazis, Dimitrios A., Orio, Maylis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7756273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33201578
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cphc.202000649
_version_ 1783626503909539840
author Gómez‐Piñeiro, Rogelio J.
Pantazis, Dimitrios A.
Orio, Maylis
author_facet Gómez‐Piñeiro, Rogelio J.
Pantazis, Dimitrios A.
Orio, Maylis
author_sort Gómez‐Piñeiro, Rogelio J.
collection PubMed
description The reliable prediction of Cu(II) hyperfine coupling constants remains a challenge for quantum chemistry. Until recently only density functional theory (DFT) could target this property for systems of realistic size. However, wave function based methods become increasingly applicable. In the present work, we define a large set of Cu(II) complexes with experimentally known hyperfine coupling constants and use it to investigate the performance of modern quantum chemical methods for the prediction of this challenging spectroscopic parameter. DFT methods are evaluated against orbital‐optimized second‐order Møller‐Plesset (OO‐MP2) theory and coupled cluster calculations including singles and doubles excitations, driven by the domain‐based local pair natural orbital approach (DLPNO‐CCSD). Special attention is paid to the definition of a basis set that converges adequately toward the basis set limit for the given property for all methods considered in this study, and a specifically optimized basis set is proposed for this purpose. The results suggest that wave function based methods can supplant but do not outcompete DFT for the calculation of Cu(II) hyperfine coupling constants. Mainstream hybrid functionals such as B3PW91 remain on average the best choice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7756273
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77562732020-12-28 Comparison of Density Functional and Correlated Wave Function Methods for the Prediction of Cu(II) Hyperfine Coupling Constants Gómez‐Piñeiro, Rogelio J. Pantazis, Dimitrios A. Orio, Maylis Chemphyschem Articles The reliable prediction of Cu(II) hyperfine coupling constants remains a challenge for quantum chemistry. Until recently only density functional theory (DFT) could target this property for systems of realistic size. However, wave function based methods become increasingly applicable. In the present work, we define a large set of Cu(II) complexes with experimentally known hyperfine coupling constants and use it to investigate the performance of modern quantum chemical methods for the prediction of this challenging spectroscopic parameter. DFT methods are evaluated against orbital‐optimized second‐order Møller‐Plesset (OO‐MP2) theory and coupled cluster calculations including singles and doubles excitations, driven by the domain‐based local pair natural orbital approach (DLPNO‐CCSD). Special attention is paid to the definition of a basis set that converges adequately toward the basis set limit for the given property for all methods considered in this study, and a specifically optimized basis set is proposed for this purpose. The results suggest that wave function based methods can supplant but do not outcompete DFT for the calculation of Cu(II) hyperfine coupling constants. Mainstream hybrid functionals such as B3PW91 remain on average the best choice. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-17 2020-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7756273/ /pubmed/33201578 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cphc.202000649 Text en © 2020 The Authors. ChemPhysChem published by Wiley-VCH GmbH This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Articles
Gómez‐Piñeiro, Rogelio J.
Pantazis, Dimitrios A.
Orio, Maylis
Comparison of Density Functional and Correlated Wave Function Methods for the Prediction of Cu(II) Hyperfine Coupling Constants
title Comparison of Density Functional and Correlated Wave Function Methods for the Prediction of Cu(II) Hyperfine Coupling Constants
title_full Comparison of Density Functional and Correlated Wave Function Methods for the Prediction of Cu(II) Hyperfine Coupling Constants
title_fullStr Comparison of Density Functional and Correlated Wave Function Methods for the Prediction of Cu(II) Hyperfine Coupling Constants
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Density Functional and Correlated Wave Function Methods for the Prediction of Cu(II) Hyperfine Coupling Constants
title_short Comparison of Density Functional and Correlated Wave Function Methods for the Prediction of Cu(II) Hyperfine Coupling Constants
title_sort comparison of density functional and correlated wave function methods for the prediction of cu(ii) hyperfine coupling constants
topic Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7756273/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33201578
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cphc.202000649
work_keys_str_mv AT gomezpineirorogelioj comparisonofdensityfunctionalandcorrelatedwavefunctionmethodsforthepredictionofcuiihyperfinecouplingconstants
AT pantazisdimitriosa comparisonofdensityfunctionalandcorrelatedwavefunctionmethodsforthepredictionofcuiihyperfinecouplingconstants
AT oriomaylis comparisonofdensityfunctionalandcorrelatedwavefunctionmethodsforthepredictionofcuiihyperfinecouplingconstants