Cargando…

De‐mystifying the “Mixifusor”

Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) using a mixture of propofol and remifentanil in the same syringe has become an accepted technique in Pediatric Anesthesia. A survey by a group of respected UK anesthetists demonstrated a low incidence of serious complications, related to the pharmacology and dose...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Absalom, Anthony R., Rigby‐Jones, Ann E., Rushton, Andrew R., Robert Sneyd, J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7756545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33051933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pan.14039
_version_ 1783626566242140160
author Absalom, Anthony R.
Rigby‐Jones, Ann E.
Rushton, Andrew R.
Robert Sneyd, J.
author_facet Absalom, Anthony R.
Rigby‐Jones, Ann E.
Rushton, Andrew R.
Robert Sneyd, J.
author_sort Absalom, Anthony R.
collection PubMed
description Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) using a mixture of propofol and remifentanil in the same syringe has become an accepted technique in Pediatric Anesthesia. A survey by a group of respected UK anesthetists demonstrated a low incidence of serious complications, related to the pharmacology and dose of the drugs. However, a current guideline for the safe use of TIVA recommends against this practice. Pharmaceutical concerns include the physical stability of the emulsion when remifentanil is mixed with propofol; changes in drug concentration over time; nonuniform mixing of propofol and remifentanil; the risk of bacterial contamination; and the potential for drug administration errors. Propofol and remifentanil have markedly different pharmacokinetic profiles. When remifentanil is mixed with propofol and delivered as a target‐controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol, remifentanil delivery is not target‐controlled but passively follows the variable infusion rates calculated by the syringe driver to deliver predicted plasma or effect‐site concentrations of propofol. The pharmacokinetic consequences can be illustrated using pharmacokinetic modeling similar to that used in TCI pumps. The clinical consequences reflect the dose‐dependent pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. Increasing the target propofol concentration produces a rapid increase and peak in remifentanil concentration that risks apnea, bradycardia, and hypotension, especially with higher concentrations of remifentanil. The faster decline in remifentanil concentration with falling propofol concentrations risks inadequate narcosis and unwanted responses to surgical stimuli. Remifentanil delivery is inflexible and dosing cannot be adjusted to the clinical need and responses of individual patients. The medicolegal considerations are stark. In UK and EU Law, mixing propofol and remifentanil creates a new, unlicensed drug and the person mixing takes on the responsibilities of manufacturer. If a patient receiving anesthesia in the form of a mixed propofol‐remifentanil infusion suffered a critical incident or actual harm, the clinician's practice may come under scrutiny and criticism, potentially involving a legal challenge and the Medical Regulator.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7756545
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77565452020-12-28 De‐mystifying the “Mixifusor” Absalom, Anthony R. Rigby‐Jones, Ann E. Rushton, Andrew R. Robert Sneyd, J. Paediatr Anaesth Special Interest Articles Total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) using a mixture of propofol and remifentanil in the same syringe has become an accepted technique in Pediatric Anesthesia. A survey by a group of respected UK anesthetists demonstrated a low incidence of serious complications, related to the pharmacology and dose of the drugs. However, a current guideline for the safe use of TIVA recommends against this practice. Pharmaceutical concerns include the physical stability of the emulsion when remifentanil is mixed with propofol; changes in drug concentration over time; nonuniform mixing of propofol and remifentanil; the risk of bacterial contamination; and the potential for drug administration errors. Propofol and remifentanil have markedly different pharmacokinetic profiles. When remifentanil is mixed with propofol and delivered as a target‐controlled infusion (TCI) of propofol, remifentanil delivery is not target‐controlled but passively follows the variable infusion rates calculated by the syringe driver to deliver predicted plasma or effect‐site concentrations of propofol. The pharmacokinetic consequences can be illustrated using pharmacokinetic modeling similar to that used in TCI pumps. The clinical consequences reflect the dose‐dependent pharmacodynamics of remifentanil. Increasing the target propofol concentration produces a rapid increase and peak in remifentanil concentration that risks apnea, bradycardia, and hypotension, especially with higher concentrations of remifentanil. The faster decline in remifentanil concentration with falling propofol concentrations risks inadequate narcosis and unwanted responses to surgical stimuli. Remifentanil delivery is inflexible and dosing cannot be adjusted to the clinical need and responses of individual patients. The medicolegal considerations are stark. In UK and EU Law, mixing propofol and remifentanil creates a new, unlicensed drug and the person mixing takes on the responsibilities of manufacturer. If a patient receiving anesthesia in the form of a mixed propofol‐remifentanil infusion suffered a critical incident or actual harm, the clinician's practice may come under scrutiny and criticism, potentially involving a legal challenge and the Medical Regulator. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-04 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7756545/ /pubmed/33051933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pan.14039 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Pediatric Anesthesia published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Special Interest Articles
Absalom, Anthony R.
Rigby‐Jones, Ann E.
Rushton, Andrew R.
Robert Sneyd, J.
De‐mystifying the “Mixifusor”
title De‐mystifying the “Mixifusor”
title_full De‐mystifying the “Mixifusor”
title_fullStr De‐mystifying the “Mixifusor”
title_full_unstemmed De‐mystifying the “Mixifusor”
title_short De‐mystifying the “Mixifusor”
title_sort de‐mystifying the “mixifusor”
topic Special Interest Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7756545/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33051933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/pan.14039
work_keys_str_mv AT absalomanthonyr demystifyingthemixifusor
AT rigbyjonesanne demystifyingthemixifusor
AT rushtonandrewr demystifyingthemixifusor
AT robertsneydj demystifyingthemixifusor