Cargando…
Gastrointestinal adverse events with insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed‐ratio combination versus glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A network meta‐analysis
AIMS: Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1 RAs) are the recommended first injectable therapy in type 2 diabetes. However, long‐term persistence is suboptimal and partly attributable to gastrointestinal tolerability, particularly during initiation/escalation. Gradual titration of fixed‐ra...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Blackwell Publishing Ltd
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7756611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32991041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.14202 |
_version_ | 1783626581389869056 |
---|---|
author | Rayner, Christopher K. Wu, Tongzhi Aroda, Vanita R. Whittington, Craig Kanters, Steve Guyot, Patricia Shaunik, Alka Horowitz, Michael |
author_facet | Rayner, Christopher K. Wu, Tongzhi Aroda, Vanita R. Whittington, Craig Kanters, Steve Guyot, Patricia Shaunik, Alka Horowitz, Michael |
author_sort | Rayner, Christopher K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIMS: Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1 RAs) are the recommended first injectable therapy in type 2 diabetes. However, long‐term persistence is suboptimal and partly attributable to gastrointestinal tolerability, particularly during initiation/escalation. Gradual titration of fixed‐ratio combination GLP‐1 RA/insulin therapies may improve GLP‐1 RA gastrointestinal tolerability. We compared gastrointestinal adverse event (AE) rates for iGlarLixi versus GLP‐1 RAs during the first 12 weeks of therapy, including a sensitivity analysis with IDegLira. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PICO framework was used to identify studies from MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL searches using a proprietary, web‐based, standardized tool with single data extraction. Gastrointestinal AEs were modelled using a Bayesian network meta‐analysis (NMA), using fixed and random effects for each recommended dose (treatment‐specific NMA) and class (drug‐class NMA). RESULTS: Treatment‐specific NMA included 17 trials (n = 9030; 3665 event‐weeks). Nausea rates were significantly lower with iGlarLixi versus exenatide 10 μg twice daily (rate ratio: 0.32; 95% credible interval: 0.15, 0.66), once‐daily lixisenatide 20 μg (0.35; 0.24, 0.50) and liraglutide 1.8 mg once daily (0.48; 0.23, 0.98). Rates were numerically, but not statistically, lower versus once‐weekly semaglutide 1 mg (0.60; 0.30, 1.23) and dulaglutide 1.5 mg (0.60; 0.29, 1.26), and numerically, but not statistically, higher versus once‐weekly exenatide (1.91; 0.91, 4.03). Sensitivity analysis results were similar. In a naïve, pooled analysis, vomiting was lower with iGlarLixi versus other GLP‐1 RAs. CONCLUSIONS: During the first 12 weeks of treatment, iGlarLixi was generally associated with less nausea and vomiting than single‐agent GLP‐1 RAs. Enhanced gastrointestinal tolerability with fixed‐ratio combinations may favour treatment persistence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7756611 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Blackwell Publishing Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77566112020-12-28 Gastrointestinal adverse events with insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed‐ratio combination versus glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A network meta‐analysis Rayner, Christopher K. Wu, Tongzhi Aroda, Vanita R. Whittington, Craig Kanters, Steve Guyot, Patricia Shaunik, Alka Horowitz, Michael Diabetes Obes Metab Original Articles AIMS: Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1 RAs) are the recommended first injectable therapy in type 2 diabetes. However, long‐term persistence is suboptimal and partly attributable to gastrointestinal tolerability, particularly during initiation/escalation. Gradual titration of fixed‐ratio combination GLP‐1 RA/insulin therapies may improve GLP‐1 RA gastrointestinal tolerability. We compared gastrointestinal adverse event (AE) rates for iGlarLixi versus GLP‐1 RAs during the first 12 weeks of therapy, including a sensitivity analysis with IDegLira. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PICO framework was used to identify studies from MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL searches using a proprietary, web‐based, standardized tool with single data extraction. Gastrointestinal AEs were modelled using a Bayesian network meta‐analysis (NMA), using fixed and random effects for each recommended dose (treatment‐specific NMA) and class (drug‐class NMA). RESULTS: Treatment‐specific NMA included 17 trials (n = 9030; 3665 event‐weeks). Nausea rates were significantly lower with iGlarLixi versus exenatide 10 μg twice daily (rate ratio: 0.32; 95% credible interval: 0.15, 0.66), once‐daily lixisenatide 20 μg (0.35; 0.24, 0.50) and liraglutide 1.8 mg once daily (0.48; 0.23, 0.98). Rates were numerically, but not statistically, lower versus once‐weekly semaglutide 1 mg (0.60; 0.30, 1.23) and dulaglutide 1.5 mg (0.60; 0.29, 1.26), and numerically, but not statistically, higher versus once‐weekly exenatide (1.91; 0.91, 4.03). Sensitivity analysis results were similar. In a naïve, pooled analysis, vomiting was lower with iGlarLixi versus other GLP‐1 RAs. CONCLUSIONS: During the first 12 weeks of treatment, iGlarLixi was generally associated with less nausea and vomiting than single‐agent GLP‐1 RAs. Enhanced gastrointestinal tolerability with fixed‐ratio combinations may favour treatment persistence. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2020-10-22 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7756611/ /pubmed/32991041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.14202 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles Rayner, Christopher K. Wu, Tongzhi Aroda, Vanita R. Whittington, Craig Kanters, Steve Guyot, Patricia Shaunik, Alka Horowitz, Michael Gastrointestinal adverse events with insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed‐ratio combination versus glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A network meta‐analysis |
title | Gastrointestinal adverse events with insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed‐ratio combination versus glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A network meta‐analysis |
title_full | Gastrointestinal adverse events with insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed‐ratio combination versus glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A network meta‐analysis |
title_fullStr | Gastrointestinal adverse events with insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed‐ratio combination versus glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A network meta‐analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Gastrointestinal adverse events with insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed‐ratio combination versus glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A network meta‐analysis |
title_short | Gastrointestinal adverse events with insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed‐ratio combination versus glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A network meta‐analysis |
title_sort | gastrointestinal adverse events with insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed‐ratio combination versus glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a network meta‐analysis |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7756611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32991041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.14202 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT raynerchristopherk gastrointestinaladverseeventswithinsulinglarginelixisenatidefixedratiocombinationversusglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsinpeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusanetworkmetaanalysis AT wutongzhi gastrointestinaladverseeventswithinsulinglarginelixisenatidefixedratiocombinationversusglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsinpeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusanetworkmetaanalysis AT arodavanitar gastrointestinaladverseeventswithinsulinglarginelixisenatidefixedratiocombinationversusglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsinpeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusanetworkmetaanalysis AT whittingtoncraig gastrointestinaladverseeventswithinsulinglarginelixisenatidefixedratiocombinationversusglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsinpeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusanetworkmetaanalysis AT kanterssteve gastrointestinaladverseeventswithinsulinglarginelixisenatidefixedratiocombinationversusglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsinpeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusanetworkmetaanalysis AT guyotpatricia gastrointestinaladverseeventswithinsulinglarginelixisenatidefixedratiocombinationversusglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsinpeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusanetworkmetaanalysis AT shaunikalka gastrointestinaladverseeventswithinsulinglarginelixisenatidefixedratiocombinationversusglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsinpeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusanetworkmetaanalysis AT horowitzmichael gastrointestinaladverseeventswithinsulinglarginelixisenatidefixedratiocombinationversusglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsinpeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusanetworkmetaanalysis |