Cargando…

Gastrointestinal adverse events with insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed‐ratio combination versus glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A network meta‐analysis

AIMS: Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1 RAs) are the recommended first injectable therapy in type 2 diabetes. However, long‐term persistence is suboptimal and partly attributable to gastrointestinal tolerability, particularly during initiation/escalation. Gradual titration of fixed‐ra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rayner, Christopher K., Wu, Tongzhi, Aroda, Vanita R., Whittington, Craig, Kanters, Steve, Guyot, Patricia, Shaunik, Alka, Horowitz, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7756611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32991041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.14202
_version_ 1783626581389869056
author Rayner, Christopher K.
Wu, Tongzhi
Aroda, Vanita R.
Whittington, Craig
Kanters, Steve
Guyot, Patricia
Shaunik, Alka
Horowitz, Michael
author_facet Rayner, Christopher K.
Wu, Tongzhi
Aroda, Vanita R.
Whittington, Craig
Kanters, Steve
Guyot, Patricia
Shaunik, Alka
Horowitz, Michael
author_sort Rayner, Christopher K.
collection PubMed
description AIMS: Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1 RAs) are the recommended first injectable therapy in type 2 diabetes. However, long‐term persistence is suboptimal and partly attributable to gastrointestinal tolerability, particularly during initiation/escalation. Gradual titration of fixed‐ratio combination GLP‐1 RA/insulin therapies may improve GLP‐1 RA gastrointestinal tolerability. We compared gastrointestinal adverse event (AE) rates for iGlarLixi versus GLP‐1 RAs during the first 12 weeks of therapy, including a sensitivity analysis with IDegLira. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PICO framework was used to identify studies from MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL searches using a proprietary, web‐based, standardized tool with single data extraction. Gastrointestinal AEs were modelled using a Bayesian network meta‐analysis (NMA), using fixed and random effects for each recommended dose (treatment‐specific NMA) and class (drug‐class NMA). RESULTS: Treatment‐specific NMA included 17 trials (n = 9030; 3665 event‐weeks). Nausea rates were significantly lower with iGlarLixi versus exenatide 10 μg twice daily (rate ratio: 0.32; 95% credible interval: 0.15, 0.66), once‐daily lixisenatide 20 μg (0.35; 0.24, 0.50) and liraglutide 1.8 mg once daily (0.48; 0.23, 0.98). Rates were numerically, but not statistically, lower versus once‐weekly semaglutide 1 mg (0.60; 0.30, 1.23) and dulaglutide 1.5 mg (0.60; 0.29, 1.26), and numerically, but not statistically, higher versus once‐weekly exenatide (1.91; 0.91, 4.03). Sensitivity analysis results were similar. In a naïve, pooled analysis, vomiting was lower with iGlarLixi versus other GLP‐1 RAs. CONCLUSIONS: During the first 12 weeks of treatment, iGlarLixi was generally associated with less nausea and vomiting than single‐agent GLP‐1 RAs. Enhanced gastrointestinal tolerability with fixed‐ratio combinations may favour treatment persistence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7756611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Blackwell Publishing Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77566112020-12-28 Gastrointestinal adverse events with insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed‐ratio combination versus glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A network meta‐analysis Rayner, Christopher K. Wu, Tongzhi Aroda, Vanita R. Whittington, Craig Kanters, Steve Guyot, Patricia Shaunik, Alka Horowitz, Michael Diabetes Obes Metab Original Articles AIMS: Glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1 RAs) are the recommended first injectable therapy in type 2 diabetes. However, long‐term persistence is suboptimal and partly attributable to gastrointestinal tolerability, particularly during initiation/escalation. Gradual titration of fixed‐ratio combination GLP‐1 RA/insulin therapies may improve GLP‐1 RA gastrointestinal tolerability. We compared gastrointestinal adverse event (AE) rates for iGlarLixi versus GLP‐1 RAs during the first 12 weeks of therapy, including a sensitivity analysis with IDegLira. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PICO framework was used to identify studies from MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL searches using a proprietary, web‐based, standardized tool with single data extraction. Gastrointestinal AEs were modelled using a Bayesian network meta‐analysis (NMA), using fixed and random effects for each recommended dose (treatment‐specific NMA) and class (drug‐class NMA). RESULTS: Treatment‐specific NMA included 17 trials (n = 9030; 3665 event‐weeks). Nausea rates were significantly lower with iGlarLixi versus exenatide 10 μg twice daily (rate ratio: 0.32; 95% credible interval: 0.15, 0.66), once‐daily lixisenatide 20 μg (0.35; 0.24, 0.50) and liraglutide 1.8 mg once daily (0.48; 0.23, 0.98). Rates were numerically, but not statistically, lower versus once‐weekly semaglutide 1 mg (0.60; 0.30, 1.23) and dulaglutide 1.5 mg (0.60; 0.29, 1.26), and numerically, but not statistically, higher versus once‐weekly exenatide (1.91; 0.91, 4.03). Sensitivity analysis results were similar. In a naïve, pooled analysis, vomiting was lower with iGlarLixi versus other GLP‐1 RAs. CONCLUSIONS: During the first 12 weeks of treatment, iGlarLixi was generally associated with less nausea and vomiting than single‐agent GLP‐1 RAs. Enhanced gastrointestinal tolerability with fixed‐ratio combinations may favour treatment persistence. Blackwell Publishing Ltd 2020-10-22 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7756611/ /pubmed/32991041 http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.14202 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Articles
Rayner, Christopher K.
Wu, Tongzhi
Aroda, Vanita R.
Whittington, Craig
Kanters, Steve
Guyot, Patricia
Shaunik, Alka
Horowitz, Michael
Gastrointestinal adverse events with insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed‐ratio combination versus glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A network meta‐analysis
title Gastrointestinal adverse events with insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed‐ratio combination versus glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A network meta‐analysis
title_full Gastrointestinal adverse events with insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed‐ratio combination versus glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A network meta‐analysis
title_fullStr Gastrointestinal adverse events with insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed‐ratio combination versus glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A network meta‐analysis
title_full_unstemmed Gastrointestinal adverse events with insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed‐ratio combination versus glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A network meta‐analysis
title_short Gastrointestinal adverse events with insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed‐ratio combination versus glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A network meta‐analysis
title_sort gastrointestinal adverse events with insulin glargine/lixisenatide fixed‐ratio combination versus glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists in people with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a network meta‐analysis
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7756611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32991041
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/dom.14202
work_keys_str_mv AT raynerchristopherk gastrointestinaladverseeventswithinsulinglarginelixisenatidefixedratiocombinationversusglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsinpeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusanetworkmetaanalysis
AT wutongzhi gastrointestinaladverseeventswithinsulinglarginelixisenatidefixedratiocombinationversusglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsinpeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusanetworkmetaanalysis
AT arodavanitar gastrointestinaladverseeventswithinsulinglarginelixisenatidefixedratiocombinationversusglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsinpeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusanetworkmetaanalysis
AT whittingtoncraig gastrointestinaladverseeventswithinsulinglarginelixisenatidefixedratiocombinationversusglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsinpeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusanetworkmetaanalysis
AT kanterssteve gastrointestinaladverseeventswithinsulinglarginelixisenatidefixedratiocombinationversusglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsinpeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusanetworkmetaanalysis
AT guyotpatricia gastrointestinaladverseeventswithinsulinglarginelixisenatidefixedratiocombinationversusglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsinpeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusanetworkmetaanalysis
AT shaunikalka gastrointestinaladverseeventswithinsulinglarginelixisenatidefixedratiocombinationversusglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsinpeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusanetworkmetaanalysis
AT horowitzmichael gastrointestinaladverseeventswithinsulinglarginelixisenatidefixedratiocombinationversusglucagonlikepeptide1receptoragonistsinpeoplewithtype2diabetesmellitusanetworkmetaanalysis