Cargando…

Understanding the Uniqueness of 2p Elements in Periodic Tables

The Periodic Table, and the unique chemical behavior of the first element in a column (group), were discovered simultaneously one and a half centuries ago. Half a century ago, this unique chemistry of the light homologs was correlated to the then available atomic orbital (AO) radii. The radially nod...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Zhen‐Ling, Hu, Han‐Shi, von Szentpály, László, Stoll, Hermann, Fritzsche, Stephan, Pyykkö, Pekka, Schwarz, W. H. Eugen, Li, Jun
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7756678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32975862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.202003920
_version_ 1783626596658184192
author Wang, Zhen‐Ling
Hu, Han‐Shi
von Szentpály, László
Stoll, Hermann
Fritzsche, Stephan
Pyykkö, Pekka
Schwarz, W. H. Eugen
Li, Jun
author_facet Wang, Zhen‐Ling
Hu, Han‐Shi
von Szentpály, László
Stoll, Hermann
Fritzsche, Stephan
Pyykkö, Pekka
Schwarz, W. H. Eugen
Li, Jun
author_sort Wang, Zhen‐Ling
collection PubMed
description The Periodic Table, and the unique chemical behavior of the first element in a column (group), were discovered simultaneously one and a half centuries ago. Half a century ago, this unique chemistry of the light homologs was correlated to the then available atomic orbital (AO) radii. The radially nodeless 1s, 2p, 3d, 4f valence AOs are particularly compact. The similarity of r (2s)≈r(2p) leads to pronounced sp‐hybrid bonding of the light p‐block elements, whereas the heavier p elements with n≥3 exhibit r (ns) ≪ r (np) of approximately −20 to −30 %. Herein, a comprehensive physical explanation is presented in terms of kinetic radial and angular, as well as potential nuclear‐attraction and electron‐screening effects. For hydrogen‐like atoms and all inner shells of the heavy atoms, r (2s) ≫ r (2p) by +20 to +30 %, whereas r (3s)≳r(3p)≳r(3d), since in Coulomb potentials radial motion is more radial orbital expanding than angular motion. However, the screening of nuclear attraction by inner core shells is more efficient for s than for p valence shells. The uniqueness of the 2p AO is explained by this differential shielding. Thereby, the present work paves the way for future physical explanations of the 3d, 4f, and 5g cases.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7756678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77566782020-12-28 Understanding the Uniqueness of 2p Elements in Periodic Tables Wang, Zhen‐Ling Hu, Han‐Shi von Szentpály, László Stoll, Hermann Fritzsche, Stephan Pyykkö, Pekka Schwarz, W. H. Eugen Li, Jun Chemistry Full Papers The Periodic Table, and the unique chemical behavior of the first element in a column (group), were discovered simultaneously one and a half centuries ago. Half a century ago, this unique chemistry of the light homologs was correlated to the then available atomic orbital (AO) radii. The radially nodeless 1s, 2p, 3d, 4f valence AOs are particularly compact. The similarity of r (2s)≈r(2p) leads to pronounced sp‐hybrid bonding of the light p‐block elements, whereas the heavier p elements with n≥3 exhibit r (ns) ≪ r (np) of approximately −20 to −30 %. Herein, a comprehensive physical explanation is presented in terms of kinetic radial and angular, as well as potential nuclear‐attraction and electron‐screening effects. For hydrogen‐like atoms and all inner shells of the heavy atoms, r (2s) ≫ r (2p) by +20 to +30 %, whereas r (3s)≳r(3p)≳r(3d), since in Coulomb potentials radial motion is more radial orbital expanding than angular motion. However, the screening of nuclear attraction by inner core shells is more efficient for s than for p valence shells. The uniqueness of the 2p AO is explained by this differential shielding. Thereby, the present work paves the way for future physical explanations of the 3d, 4f, and 5g cases. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-16 2020-12-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7756678/ /pubmed/32975862 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.202003920 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published by Wiley-VCH GmbH This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Full Papers
Wang, Zhen‐Ling
Hu, Han‐Shi
von Szentpály, László
Stoll, Hermann
Fritzsche, Stephan
Pyykkö, Pekka
Schwarz, W. H. Eugen
Li, Jun
Understanding the Uniqueness of 2p Elements in Periodic Tables
title Understanding the Uniqueness of 2p Elements in Periodic Tables
title_full Understanding the Uniqueness of 2p Elements in Periodic Tables
title_fullStr Understanding the Uniqueness of 2p Elements in Periodic Tables
title_full_unstemmed Understanding the Uniqueness of 2p Elements in Periodic Tables
title_short Understanding the Uniqueness of 2p Elements in Periodic Tables
title_sort understanding the uniqueness of 2p elements in periodic tables
topic Full Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7756678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32975862
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/chem.202003920
work_keys_str_mv AT wangzhenling understandingtheuniquenessof2pelementsinperiodictables
AT huhanshi understandingtheuniquenessof2pelementsinperiodictables
AT vonszentpalylaszlo understandingtheuniquenessof2pelementsinperiodictables
AT stollhermann understandingtheuniquenessof2pelementsinperiodictables
AT fritzschestephan understandingtheuniquenessof2pelementsinperiodictables
AT pyykkopekka understandingtheuniquenessof2pelementsinperiodictables
AT schwarzwheugen understandingtheuniquenessof2pelementsinperiodictables
AT lijun understandingtheuniquenessof2pelementsinperiodictables