Cargando…

Socioeconomic Inequalities in Home-Care Use Across Regional Long-term Care Systems in Europe

OBJECTIVES: We examine whether socioeconomic inequalities in home-care use among disabled older adults are related to the contextual characteristics of long-term care (LTC) systems. Specifically, we investigate how wealth and income gradients in the use of informal, formal, and mixed home-care vary...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Floridi, Ginevra, Carrino, Ludovico, Glaser, Karen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7756692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32996570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa139
_version_ 1783626598999654400
author Floridi, Ginevra
Carrino, Ludovico
Glaser, Karen
author_facet Floridi, Ginevra
Carrino, Ludovico
Glaser, Karen
author_sort Floridi, Ginevra
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: We examine whether socioeconomic inequalities in home-care use among disabled older adults are related to the contextual characteristics of long-term care (LTC) systems. Specifically, we investigate how wealth and income gradients in the use of informal, formal, and mixed home-care vary according to the degree to which LTC systems offer alternatives to families as the main providers of care (“de-familization”). METHOD: We use survey data from SHARE on disabled older adults from 136 administrative regions in 12 European countries and link them to a regional indicator of de-familization in LTC, measured by the number of available LTC beds in care homes. We use multinomial multilevel models, with and without country fixed-effects, to study home-care use as a function of individual-level and regional-level LTC characteristics. We interact financial wealth and income with the number of LTC beds to assess whether socioeconomic gradients in home-care use differ across regions according to the degree of de-familization in LTC. RESULTS: We find robust evidence that socioeconomic status inequalities in the use of mixed-care are lower in more de-familized LTC systems. Poorer people are more likely than the wealthier to combine informal and formal home-care use in regions with more LTC beds. SES inequalities in the exclusive use of informal or formal care do not differ by the level of de-familization. DISCUSSION: The results suggest that de-familization in LTC favors the combination of formal and informal home-care among the more socioeconomically disadvantaged, potentially mitigating health inequalities in later life.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7756692
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77566922020-12-31 Socioeconomic Inequalities in Home-Care Use Across Regional Long-term Care Systems in Europe Floridi, Ginevra Carrino, Ludovico Glaser, Karen J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci The Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences OBJECTIVES: We examine whether socioeconomic inequalities in home-care use among disabled older adults are related to the contextual characteristics of long-term care (LTC) systems. Specifically, we investigate how wealth and income gradients in the use of informal, formal, and mixed home-care vary according to the degree to which LTC systems offer alternatives to families as the main providers of care (“de-familization”). METHOD: We use survey data from SHARE on disabled older adults from 136 administrative regions in 12 European countries and link them to a regional indicator of de-familization in LTC, measured by the number of available LTC beds in care homes. We use multinomial multilevel models, with and without country fixed-effects, to study home-care use as a function of individual-level and regional-level LTC characteristics. We interact financial wealth and income with the number of LTC beds to assess whether socioeconomic gradients in home-care use differ across regions according to the degree of de-familization in LTC. RESULTS: We find robust evidence that socioeconomic status inequalities in the use of mixed-care are lower in more de-familized LTC systems. Poorer people are more likely than the wealthier to combine informal and formal home-care use in regions with more LTC beds. SES inequalities in the exclusive use of informal or formal care do not differ by the level of de-familization. DISCUSSION: The results suggest that de-familization in LTC favors the combination of formal and informal home-care among the more socioeconomically disadvantaged, potentially mitigating health inequalities in later life. Oxford University Press 2020-09-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7756692/ /pubmed/32996570 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa139 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Gerontological Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle The Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences
Floridi, Ginevra
Carrino, Ludovico
Glaser, Karen
Socioeconomic Inequalities in Home-Care Use Across Regional Long-term Care Systems in Europe
title Socioeconomic Inequalities in Home-Care Use Across Regional Long-term Care Systems in Europe
title_full Socioeconomic Inequalities in Home-Care Use Across Regional Long-term Care Systems in Europe
title_fullStr Socioeconomic Inequalities in Home-Care Use Across Regional Long-term Care Systems in Europe
title_full_unstemmed Socioeconomic Inequalities in Home-Care Use Across Regional Long-term Care Systems in Europe
title_short Socioeconomic Inequalities in Home-Care Use Across Regional Long-term Care Systems in Europe
title_sort socioeconomic inequalities in home-care use across regional long-term care systems in europe
topic The Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7756692/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32996570
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/geronb/gbaa139
work_keys_str_mv AT floridiginevra socioeconomicinequalitiesinhomecareuseacrossregionallongtermcaresystemsineurope
AT carrinoludovico socioeconomicinequalitiesinhomecareuseacrossregionallongtermcaresystemsineurope
AT glaserkaren socioeconomicinequalitiesinhomecareuseacrossregionallongtermcaresystemsineurope