Cargando…

Robotic and laparoscopic liver surgery for colorectal liver metastases: an experience from a German Academic Center

BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is increasing in incidence. The aim of this work was to present our experience by reporting short-term and long-term outcomes after MILS for CRLM with comparative analysis of laparoscopic (LLS)...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rahimli, Mirhasan, Perrakis, Aristotelis, Schellerer, Vera, Gumbs, Andrew, Lorenz, Eric, Franz, Mareike, Arend, Jörg, Negrini, Victor-Radu, Croner, Roland Siegfried
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7756910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33353551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-02113-1
_version_ 1783626645202010112
author Rahimli, Mirhasan
Perrakis, Aristotelis
Schellerer, Vera
Gumbs, Andrew
Lorenz, Eric
Franz, Mareike
Arend, Jörg
Negrini, Victor-Radu
Croner, Roland Siegfried
author_facet Rahimli, Mirhasan
Perrakis, Aristotelis
Schellerer, Vera
Gumbs, Andrew
Lorenz, Eric
Franz, Mareike
Arend, Jörg
Negrini, Victor-Radu
Croner, Roland Siegfried
author_sort Rahimli, Mirhasan
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is increasing in incidence. The aim of this work was to present our experience by reporting short-term and long-term outcomes after MILS for CRLM with comparative analysis of laparoscopic (LLS) and robotic liver surgery (RLS). METHODS: Twenty-five patients with CRLM, who underwent MILS between May 2012 and March 2020, were selected from our retrospective registry of minimally invasive liver surgery (MD-MILS). Thirteen of these patients underwent LLS and 12 RLS. Short-term and long-term outcomes of both groups were analyzed. RESULTS: Operating time was significantly longer in the RLS vs. the LLS group (342.0 vs. 200.0 min; p = 0.004). There was no significant difference between the laparoscopic vs. the robotic group regarding length of postoperative stay (8.8 days), measured blood loss (430.4 ml), intraoperative blood transfusion, overall morbidity (20.0%), and liver surgery related morbidity (4%). The mean BMI was 27.3 (range from 19.2 to 44.8) kg/m(2). The 30-day mortality was 0%. R0 resection was achieved in all patients (100.0%) in RLS vs. 10 patients (76.9%) in LLS. Major resections were carried out in 32.0% of the cases, and 84.0% of the patients showed intra-abdominal adhesions due to previous abdominal surgery. In 24.0% of cases, the tumor was bilobar, the maximum number of tumors removed was 9, and the largest tumor was 8.5 cm in diameter. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 84, 56.9, and 48.7%, respectively. The 1- and 3-year overall recurrence-free survival rates were 49.6 and 36.2%, respectively, without significant differences between RLS vs. LLS. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive liver surgery for CRLM is safe and feasible. Minimally invasive resection of multiple lesions and large tumors is also possible. RLS may help to achieve higher rates of R0 resections. High BMI, previous abdominal surgery, and bilobar tumors are not a barrier for MILS. Laparoscopic and robotic liver resections for CRLM provide similar long-term results which are comparable to open techniques.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7756910
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77569102020-12-28 Robotic and laparoscopic liver surgery for colorectal liver metastases: an experience from a German Academic Center Rahimli, Mirhasan Perrakis, Aristotelis Schellerer, Vera Gumbs, Andrew Lorenz, Eric Franz, Mareike Arend, Jörg Negrini, Victor-Radu Croner, Roland Siegfried World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive liver surgery (MILS) in the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is increasing in incidence. The aim of this work was to present our experience by reporting short-term and long-term outcomes after MILS for CRLM with comparative analysis of laparoscopic (LLS) and robotic liver surgery (RLS). METHODS: Twenty-five patients with CRLM, who underwent MILS between May 2012 and March 2020, were selected from our retrospective registry of minimally invasive liver surgery (MD-MILS). Thirteen of these patients underwent LLS and 12 RLS. Short-term and long-term outcomes of both groups were analyzed. RESULTS: Operating time was significantly longer in the RLS vs. the LLS group (342.0 vs. 200.0 min; p = 0.004). There was no significant difference between the laparoscopic vs. the robotic group regarding length of postoperative stay (8.8 days), measured blood loss (430.4 ml), intraoperative blood transfusion, overall morbidity (20.0%), and liver surgery related morbidity (4%). The mean BMI was 27.3 (range from 19.2 to 44.8) kg/m(2). The 30-day mortality was 0%. R0 resection was achieved in all patients (100.0%) in RLS vs. 10 patients (76.9%) in LLS. Major resections were carried out in 32.0% of the cases, and 84.0% of the patients showed intra-abdominal adhesions due to previous abdominal surgery. In 24.0% of cases, the tumor was bilobar, the maximum number of tumors removed was 9, and the largest tumor was 8.5 cm in diameter. The 1-, 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 84, 56.9, and 48.7%, respectively. The 1- and 3-year overall recurrence-free survival rates were 49.6 and 36.2%, respectively, without significant differences between RLS vs. LLS. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive liver surgery for CRLM is safe and feasible. Minimally invasive resection of multiple lesions and large tumors is also possible. RLS may help to achieve higher rates of R0 resections. High BMI, previous abdominal surgery, and bilobar tumors are not a barrier for MILS. Laparoscopic and robotic liver resections for CRLM provide similar long-term results which are comparable to open techniques. BioMed Central 2020-12-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7756910/ /pubmed/33353551 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-02113-1 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Rahimli, Mirhasan
Perrakis, Aristotelis
Schellerer, Vera
Gumbs, Andrew
Lorenz, Eric
Franz, Mareike
Arend, Jörg
Negrini, Victor-Radu
Croner, Roland Siegfried
Robotic and laparoscopic liver surgery for colorectal liver metastases: an experience from a German Academic Center
title Robotic and laparoscopic liver surgery for colorectal liver metastases: an experience from a German Academic Center
title_full Robotic and laparoscopic liver surgery for colorectal liver metastases: an experience from a German Academic Center
title_fullStr Robotic and laparoscopic liver surgery for colorectal liver metastases: an experience from a German Academic Center
title_full_unstemmed Robotic and laparoscopic liver surgery for colorectal liver metastases: an experience from a German Academic Center
title_short Robotic and laparoscopic liver surgery for colorectal liver metastases: an experience from a German Academic Center
title_sort robotic and laparoscopic liver surgery for colorectal liver metastases: an experience from a german academic center
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7756910/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33353551
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-020-02113-1
work_keys_str_mv AT rahimlimirhasan roboticandlaparoscopicliversurgeryforcolorectallivermetastasesanexperiencefromagermanacademiccenter
AT perrakisaristotelis roboticandlaparoscopicliversurgeryforcolorectallivermetastasesanexperiencefromagermanacademiccenter
AT schellerervera roboticandlaparoscopicliversurgeryforcolorectallivermetastasesanexperiencefromagermanacademiccenter
AT gumbsandrew roboticandlaparoscopicliversurgeryforcolorectallivermetastasesanexperiencefromagermanacademiccenter
AT lorenzeric roboticandlaparoscopicliversurgeryforcolorectallivermetastasesanexperiencefromagermanacademiccenter
AT franzmareike roboticandlaparoscopicliversurgeryforcolorectallivermetastasesanexperiencefromagermanacademiccenter
AT arendjorg roboticandlaparoscopicliversurgeryforcolorectallivermetastasesanexperiencefromagermanacademiccenter
AT negrinivictorradu roboticandlaparoscopicliversurgeryforcolorectallivermetastasesanexperiencefromagermanacademiccenter
AT cronerrolandsiegfried roboticandlaparoscopicliversurgeryforcolorectallivermetastasesanexperiencefromagermanacademiccenter