Cargando…

Cardiac arrhythmias in patients with SARS-CoV‑2 infection and effects of the lockdown on invasive rhythmological therapy

BACKGROUND: Since the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, various strategies have been taken worldwide to reduce the risk of infection. As part of the amendment to the Infection Protection Act, elective medical interventions were restricted, leading to a change in patient c...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mathew, Shibu, Fraebel, Christian, Johnson, Victoria, Abdelgwad, Saboukh, Schneider, Nikita, Müller, Patrick, Chasan, Ritvan, Hamm, Christian, Schmitt, Joern
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Medizin 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7757077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33355696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00399-020-00734-3
_version_ 1783626672612835328
author Mathew, Shibu
Fraebel, Christian
Johnson, Victoria
Abdelgwad, Saboukh
Schneider, Nikita
Müller, Patrick
Chasan, Ritvan
Hamm, Christian
Schmitt, Joern
author_facet Mathew, Shibu
Fraebel, Christian
Johnson, Victoria
Abdelgwad, Saboukh
Schneider, Nikita
Müller, Patrick
Chasan, Ritvan
Hamm, Christian
Schmitt, Joern
author_sort Mathew, Shibu
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Since the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, various strategies have been taken worldwide to reduce the risk of infection. As part of the amendment to the Infection Protection Act, elective medical interventions were restricted, leading to a change in patient care. However, the consequences of the lockdown on the treatment of rhythmological patients in Germany remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the reduction in rhythmological interventions and the patient care situation using a nationwide survey during the first lockdown period. METHODS: A survey was sent to all electrophysiological centers certified by the German Society of Cardiology. Here, the treatment volume of tachycardia and bradycardia and their invasive therapy were surveyed before and during the lockdown period. Furthermore, the number of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) treated at these centers and the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias was also recorded. RESULTS: Participating centers performed a total of 24,648 ablation procedures/year and represent approximately 34% (24,648/72,548) of the estimated German ablation treatments. The majority of these centers (33/40; 82.5%) were so-called primary COVID-19 hospitals (level-1). Overall, the number of ablations and pacemaker implantations were reduced by 41% and 18% respectively. Due to postponed ablation procedures and pacemaker implantations, 22/40 (55%) centers reported a worsening of clinical symptoms or early re-hospitalization of their patients. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate a significant decline in elective rhythmological procedures during the lockdown, as required by the German Federal Government. At the same time, however, more than half of the participating centers reported an increase in patient re-hospitalizations due to postponed procedures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7757077
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer Medizin
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77570772020-12-23 Cardiac arrhythmias in patients with SARS-CoV‑2 infection and effects of the lockdown on invasive rhythmological therapy Mathew, Shibu Fraebel, Christian Johnson, Victoria Abdelgwad, Saboukh Schneider, Nikita Müller, Patrick Chasan, Ritvan Hamm, Christian Schmitt, Joern Herzschrittmacherther Elektrophysiol Original Contributions BACKGROUND: Since the outbreak of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, various strategies have been taken worldwide to reduce the risk of infection. As part of the amendment to the Infection Protection Act, elective medical interventions were restricted, leading to a change in patient care. However, the consequences of the lockdown on the treatment of rhythmological patients in Germany remains unclear. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to analyze the reduction in rhythmological interventions and the patient care situation using a nationwide survey during the first lockdown period. METHODS: A survey was sent to all electrophysiological centers certified by the German Society of Cardiology. Here, the treatment volume of tachycardia and bradycardia and their invasive therapy were surveyed before and during the lockdown period. Furthermore, the number of patients with severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) treated at these centers and the incidence of cardiac arrhythmias was also recorded. RESULTS: Participating centers performed a total of 24,648 ablation procedures/year and represent approximately 34% (24,648/72,548) of the estimated German ablation treatments. The majority of these centers (33/40; 82.5%) were so-called primary COVID-19 hospitals (level-1). Overall, the number of ablations and pacemaker implantations were reduced by 41% and 18% respectively. Due to postponed ablation procedures and pacemaker implantations, 22/40 (55%) centers reported a worsening of clinical symptoms or early re-hospitalization of their patients. CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate a significant decline in elective rhythmological procedures during the lockdown, as required by the German Federal Government. At the same time, however, more than half of the participating centers reported an increase in patient re-hospitalizations due to postponed procedures. Springer Medizin 2020-12-23 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7757077/ /pubmed/33355696 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00399-020-00734-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Original Contributions
Mathew, Shibu
Fraebel, Christian
Johnson, Victoria
Abdelgwad, Saboukh
Schneider, Nikita
Müller, Patrick
Chasan, Ritvan
Hamm, Christian
Schmitt, Joern
Cardiac arrhythmias in patients with SARS-CoV‑2 infection and effects of the lockdown on invasive rhythmological therapy
title Cardiac arrhythmias in patients with SARS-CoV‑2 infection and effects of the lockdown on invasive rhythmological therapy
title_full Cardiac arrhythmias in patients with SARS-CoV‑2 infection and effects of the lockdown on invasive rhythmological therapy
title_fullStr Cardiac arrhythmias in patients with SARS-CoV‑2 infection and effects of the lockdown on invasive rhythmological therapy
title_full_unstemmed Cardiac arrhythmias in patients with SARS-CoV‑2 infection and effects of the lockdown on invasive rhythmological therapy
title_short Cardiac arrhythmias in patients with SARS-CoV‑2 infection and effects of the lockdown on invasive rhythmological therapy
title_sort cardiac arrhythmias in patients with sars-cov‑2 infection and effects of the lockdown on invasive rhythmological therapy
topic Original Contributions
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7757077/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33355696
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00399-020-00734-3
work_keys_str_mv AT mathewshibu cardiacarrhythmiasinpatientswithsarscov2infectionandeffectsofthelockdownoninvasiverhythmologicaltherapy
AT fraebelchristian cardiacarrhythmiasinpatientswithsarscov2infectionandeffectsofthelockdownoninvasiverhythmologicaltherapy
AT johnsonvictoria cardiacarrhythmiasinpatientswithsarscov2infectionandeffectsofthelockdownoninvasiverhythmologicaltherapy
AT abdelgwadsaboukh cardiacarrhythmiasinpatientswithsarscov2infectionandeffectsofthelockdownoninvasiverhythmologicaltherapy
AT schneidernikita cardiacarrhythmiasinpatientswithsarscov2infectionandeffectsofthelockdownoninvasiverhythmologicaltherapy
AT mullerpatrick cardiacarrhythmiasinpatientswithsarscov2infectionandeffectsofthelockdownoninvasiverhythmologicaltherapy
AT chasanritvan cardiacarrhythmiasinpatientswithsarscov2infectionandeffectsofthelockdownoninvasiverhythmologicaltherapy
AT hammchristian cardiacarrhythmiasinpatientswithsarscov2infectionandeffectsofthelockdownoninvasiverhythmologicaltherapy
AT schmittjoern cardiacarrhythmiasinpatientswithsarscov2infectionandeffectsofthelockdownoninvasiverhythmologicaltherapy