Cargando…

Effect of a high protein/low glycaemic index diet on insulin resistance in adolescents with overweight/obesity—A PREVIEW randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND: Pubertal insulin resistance (IR) is associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus development in adolescents with overweight/obesity. OBJECTIVES: The PREVIEW study was a randomized parallel trial assessing the change in IR, analyzed by Homeostatic Model Assessment of IR (HOM...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dorenbos, Elke, Drummen, Mathijs, Adam, Tanja, Rijks, Jesse, Winkens, Bjorn, Martínez, J. Alfredo, Navas‐Carretero, Santiago, Stratton, Gareth, Swindell, Nils, Stouthart, Pauline, Mackintosh, Kelly, Mcnarry, Melitta, Tremblay, Angelo, Fogelholm, Mikael, Raben, Anne, Westerterp‐Plantenga, Margriet, Vreugdenhil, Anita
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7757177/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32681547
http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijpo.12702
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Pubertal insulin resistance (IR) is associated with increased risk of type 2 diabetes mellitus development in adolescents with overweight/obesity. OBJECTIVES: The PREVIEW study was a randomized parallel trial assessing the change in IR, analyzed by Homeostatic Model Assessment of IR (HOMA‐IR), at 2 years after randomization to a high protein vs a moderate protein diet in adolescents with overweight/obesity. It was hypothesized that a high protein/low glycaemic index diet would be superior in reducing IR compared to a medium protein/medium GI diet, in insulin resistant adolescents with overweight or obesity. METHODS: Adolescents with overweight/obesity and IR from the Netherlands, United Kingdom and Spain were randomized into a moderate protein/moderate GI (15/55/30En% protein/carbohydrate/fat, GI ≥ 56) or high protein/low GI (25/45/30En% protein/carbohydrate/fat, GI < 50) diet. Anthropometric and cardiometabolic parameters, puberty, dietary intake and physical activity (PA) were measured and effects on HOMA‐IR were analyzed. RESULTS: 126 adolescents were included in this study (13.6 ± 2.2 years, BMI z‐score 3.04 ± 0.66, HOMA‐IR 3.48 ± 2.28, HP n = 68, MP n = 58). At 2 years, changes in protein intake were not significantly different between timepoints or intervention groups and no effects of the intervention on IR were observed. The retention rate was 39%, while no compliance to the diets was observed. CONCLUSIONS: The PREVIEW study observed no effect of a high protein/low GI diet on IR in adolescents with overweight/obesity and IR because of lack of feasibility, due to insufficient retention and dietary compliance after 2 years.