Cargando…

Contextual equipoise: a novel concept to inform ethical implications for implementation research in low-income and middle-income countries

The call for universal health coverage requires the urgent implementation and scale-up of interventions that are known to be effective, in resource-poor settings. Achieving this objective requires high-quality implementation research (IR) that evaluates the complex phenomenon of the influence of con...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Seward, Nadine, Hanlon, Charlotte, Murdoch, Jamie, Colbourn, Tim, Prince, Martin James, Venkatapuram, Sridhar, Sevdalis, Nick
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7757476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33355266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003456
_version_ 1783626754576875520
author Seward, Nadine
Hanlon, Charlotte
Murdoch, Jamie
Colbourn, Tim
Prince, Martin James
Venkatapuram, Sridhar
Sevdalis, Nick
author_facet Seward, Nadine
Hanlon, Charlotte
Murdoch, Jamie
Colbourn, Tim
Prince, Martin James
Venkatapuram, Sridhar
Sevdalis, Nick
author_sort Seward, Nadine
collection PubMed
description The call for universal health coverage requires the urgent implementation and scale-up of interventions that are known to be effective, in resource-poor settings. Achieving this objective requires high-quality implementation research (IR) that evaluates the complex phenomenon of the influence of context on the ability to effectively deliver evidence-based practice. Nevertheless, IR for global health is failing to apply a robust, theoretically driven approach, leading to ethical concerns associated with research that is not methodologically sound. Inappropriate methods are often used in IR to address and report on context. This may result in a lack in understanding of how to effectively adapt the intervention to the new setting and a lack of clarity in conceptualising whether there is sufficient evidence to generalise findings from previous IR to a new setting, or if a randomised controlled trial (RCT) is needed. Some of the ethical issues arising from this shortcoming include poor-quality research that may needlessly expose vulnerable participants to research that has not been adapted to suit local needs and priorities, and the inappropriate use of RCTs that denies participants in the control arm access to treatment that is effective within the local context. To address these concerns, we propose a complementary approach to clinical equipoise for IR, known as contextual equipoise. We discuss challenges in the evaluation of context and also with assessing the certainty of evidence to justify an RCT. Finally, we describe methods that can be applied to improve the evaluation and reporting of context and to help understand if contextual equipoise can be justified or if significant adaptations are required. We hope our analysis offers helpful insight to better understand and ensure that the ethical principle of beneficence is upheld in the real-world contexts of IR in low-resource settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7757476
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77574762020-12-28 Contextual equipoise: a novel concept to inform ethical implications for implementation research in low-income and middle-income countries Seward, Nadine Hanlon, Charlotte Murdoch, Jamie Colbourn, Tim Prince, Martin James Venkatapuram, Sridhar Sevdalis, Nick BMJ Glob Health Practice The call for universal health coverage requires the urgent implementation and scale-up of interventions that are known to be effective, in resource-poor settings. Achieving this objective requires high-quality implementation research (IR) that evaluates the complex phenomenon of the influence of context on the ability to effectively deliver evidence-based practice. Nevertheless, IR for global health is failing to apply a robust, theoretically driven approach, leading to ethical concerns associated with research that is not methodologically sound. Inappropriate methods are often used in IR to address and report on context. This may result in a lack in understanding of how to effectively adapt the intervention to the new setting and a lack of clarity in conceptualising whether there is sufficient evidence to generalise findings from previous IR to a new setting, or if a randomised controlled trial (RCT) is needed. Some of the ethical issues arising from this shortcoming include poor-quality research that may needlessly expose vulnerable participants to research that has not been adapted to suit local needs and priorities, and the inappropriate use of RCTs that denies participants in the control arm access to treatment that is effective within the local context. To address these concerns, we propose a complementary approach to clinical equipoise for IR, known as contextual equipoise. We discuss challenges in the evaluation of context and also with assessing the certainty of evidence to justify an RCT. Finally, we describe methods that can be applied to improve the evaluation and reporting of context and to help understand if contextual equipoise can be justified or if significant adaptations are required. We hope our analysis offers helpful insight to better understand and ensure that the ethical principle of beneficence is upheld in the real-world contexts of IR in low-resource settings. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7757476/ /pubmed/33355266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003456 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle Practice
Seward, Nadine
Hanlon, Charlotte
Murdoch, Jamie
Colbourn, Tim
Prince, Martin James
Venkatapuram, Sridhar
Sevdalis, Nick
Contextual equipoise: a novel concept to inform ethical implications for implementation research in low-income and middle-income countries
title Contextual equipoise: a novel concept to inform ethical implications for implementation research in low-income and middle-income countries
title_full Contextual equipoise: a novel concept to inform ethical implications for implementation research in low-income and middle-income countries
title_fullStr Contextual equipoise: a novel concept to inform ethical implications for implementation research in low-income and middle-income countries
title_full_unstemmed Contextual equipoise: a novel concept to inform ethical implications for implementation research in low-income and middle-income countries
title_short Contextual equipoise: a novel concept to inform ethical implications for implementation research in low-income and middle-income countries
title_sort contextual equipoise: a novel concept to inform ethical implications for implementation research in low-income and middle-income countries
topic Practice
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7757476/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33355266
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003456
work_keys_str_mv AT sewardnadine contextualequipoiseanovelconcepttoinformethicalimplicationsforimplementationresearchinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountries
AT hanloncharlotte contextualequipoiseanovelconcepttoinformethicalimplicationsforimplementationresearchinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountries
AT murdochjamie contextualequipoiseanovelconcepttoinformethicalimplicationsforimplementationresearchinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountries
AT colbourntim contextualequipoiseanovelconcepttoinformethicalimplicationsforimplementationresearchinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountries
AT princemartinjames contextualequipoiseanovelconcepttoinformethicalimplicationsforimplementationresearchinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountries
AT venkatapuramsridhar contextualequipoiseanovelconcepttoinformethicalimplicationsforimplementationresearchinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountries
AT sevdalisnick contextualequipoiseanovelconcepttoinformethicalimplicationsforimplementationresearchinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountries