Cargando…
Contextual equipoise: a novel concept to inform ethical implications for implementation research in low-income and middle-income countries
The call for universal health coverage requires the urgent implementation and scale-up of interventions that are known to be effective, in resource-poor settings. Achieving this objective requires high-quality implementation research (IR) that evaluates the complex phenomenon of the influence of con...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7757476/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33355266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003456 |
_version_ | 1783626754576875520 |
---|---|
author | Seward, Nadine Hanlon, Charlotte Murdoch, Jamie Colbourn, Tim Prince, Martin James Venkatapuram, Sridhar Sevdalis, Nick |
author_facet | Seward, Nadine Hanlon, Charlotte Murdoch, Jamie Colbourn, Tim Prince, Martin James Venkatapuram, Sridhar Sevdalis, Nick |
author_sort | Seward, Nadine |
collection | PubMed |
description | The call for universal health coverage requires the urgent implementation and scale-up of interventions that are known to be effective, in resource-poor settings. Achieving this objective requires high-quality implementation research (IR) that evaluates the complex phenomenon of the influence of context on the ability to effectively deliver evidence-based practice. Nevertheless, IR for global health is failing to apply a robust, theoretically driven approach, leading to ethical concerns associated with research that is not methodologically sound. Inappropriate methods are often used in IR to address and report on context. This may result in a lack in understanding of how to effectively adapt the intervention to the new setting and a lack of clarity in conceptualising whether there is sufficient evidence to generalise findings from previous IR to a new setting, or if a randomised controlled trial (RCT) is needed. Some of the ethical issues arising from this shortcoming include poor-quality research that may needlessly expose vulnerable participants to research that has not been adapted to suit local needs and priorities, and the inappropriate use of RCTs that denies participants in the control arm access to treatment that is effective within the local context. To address these concerns, we propose a complementary approach to clinical equipoise for IR, known as contextual equipoise. We discuss challenges in the evaluation of context and also with assessing the certainty of evidence to justify an RCT. Finally, we describe methods that can be applied to improve the evaluation and reporting of context and to help understand if contextual equipoise can be justified or if significant adaptations are required. We hope our analysis offers helpful insight to better understand and ensure that the ethical principle of beneficence is upheld in the real-world contexts of IR in low-resource settings. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7757476 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77574762020-12-28 Contextual equipoise: a novel concept to inform ethical implications for implementation research in low-income and middle-income countries Seward, Nadine Hanlon, Charlotte Murdoch, Jamie Colbourn, Tim Prince, Martin James Venkatapuram, Sridhar Sevdalis, Nick BMJ Glob Health Practice The call for universal health coverage requires the urgent implementation and scale-up of interventions that are known to be effective, in resource-poor settings. Achieving this objective requires high-quality implementation research (IR) that evaluates the complex phenomenon of the influence of context on the ability to effectively deliver evidence-based practice. Nevertheless, IR for global health is failing to apply a robust, theoretically driven approach, leading to ethical concerns associated with research that is not methodologically sound. Inappropriate methods are often used in IR to address and report on context. This may result in a lack in understanding of how to effectively adapt the intervention to the new setting and a lack of clarity in conceptualising whether there is sufficient evidence to generalise findings from previous IR to a new setting, or if a randomised controlled trial (RCT) is needed. Some of the ethical issues arising from this shortcoming include poor-quality research that may needlessly expose vulnerable participants to research that has not been adapted to suit local needs and priorities, and the inappropriate use of RCTs that denies participants in the control arm access to treatment that is effective within the local context. To address these concerns, we propose a complementary approach to clinical equipoise for IR, known as contextual equipoise. We discuss challenges in the evaluation of context and also with assessing the certainty of evidence to justify an RCT. Finally, we describe methods that can be applied to improve the evaluation and reporting of context and to help understand if contextual equipoise can be justified or if significant adaptations are required. We hope our analysis offers helpful insight to better understand and ensure that the ethical principle of beneficence is upheld in the real-world contexts of IR in low-resource settings. BMJ Publishing Group 2020-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7757476/ /pubmed/33355266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003456 Text en © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2020. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Practice Seward, Nadine Hanlon, Charlotte Murdoch, Jamie Colbourn, Tim Prince, Martin James Venkatapuram, Sridhar Sevdalis, Nick Contextual equipoise: a novel concept to inform ethical implications for implementation research in low-income and middle-income countries |
title | Contextual equipoise: a novel concept to inform ethical implications for implementation research in low-income and middle-income countries |
title_full | Contextual equipoise: a novel concept to inform ethical implications for implementation research in low-income and middle-income countries |
title_fullStr | Contextual equipoise: a novel concept to inform ethical implications for implementation research in low-income and middle-income countries |
title_full_unstemmed | Contextual equipoise: a novel concept to inform ethical implications for implementation research in low-income and middle-income countries |
title_short | Contextual equipoise: a novel concept to inform ethical implications for implementation research in low-income and middle-income countries |
title_sort | contextual equipoise: a novel concept to inform ethical implications for implementation research in low-income and middle-income countries |
topic | Practice |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7757476/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33355266 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003456 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT sewardnadine contextualequipoiseanovelconcepttoinformethicalimplicationsforimplementationresearchinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountries AT hanloncharlotte contextualequipoiseanovelconcepttoinformethicalimplicationsforimplementationresearchinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountries AT murdochjamie contextualequipoiseanovelconcepttoinformethicalimplicationsforimplementationresearchinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountries AT colbourntim contextualequipoiseanovelconcepttoinformethicalimplicationsforimplementationresearchinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountries AT princemartinjames contextualequipoiseanovelconcepttoinformethicalimplicationsforimplementationresearchinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountries AT venkatapuramsridhar contextualequipoiseanovelconcepttoinformethicalimplicationsforimplementationresearchinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountries AT sevdalisnick contextualequipoiseanovelconcepttoinformethicalimplicationsforimplementationresearchinlowincomeandmiddleincomecountries |