Cargando…
Subsphincteric Anastomosis During Laparoscopic Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Its Positive Impact on Continence Recovery
Introduction: To assess the interest of a new sphincter preserving anastomosis technique for continence recovery after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). Materials and Methods: We performed a monocentric single-operator study on 187 consecutive RALP. Patients were divided into...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7757522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32674608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0379 |
_version_ | 1783626759080509440 |
---|---|
author | Almeras, Christophe Tollon, Christophe Salin, Ambroise Beauval, Jean-Baptiste Loison, Guillaume Gautier, Jean Romain Ploussard, Guillaume |
author_facet | Almeras, Christophe Tollon, Christophe Salin, Ambroise Beauval, Jean-Baptiste Loison, Guillaume Gautier, Jean Romain Ploussard, Guillaume |
author_sort | Almeras, Christophe |
collection | PubMed |
description | Introduction: To assess the interest of a new sphincter preserving anastomosis technique for continence recovery after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). Materials and Methods: We performed a monocentric single-operator study on 187 consecutive RALP. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (standard anastomosis, until December 2017) and Group 2 (subsphincteric anastomosis [SSA], since January 2018). The SSA consisted in respecting the sphincteric sleeve during the anastomosis suturing only the internal layer of the urethra with the bladder and thereby avoiding the loss of sphincteric length induced by the suture. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative data were prospectively collected and compared. Criteria of continence were as follows: no pad use and complete absence of leakage at catheter removal at 1 month and 1 year. Results: The two groups were comparable in terms of prostate-specific antigen, gland volume, and Gleason score. In Group 2 (SSA), we observed a complete continence recovery in 75.6% at catheter removal (p = 0.0000035), in 82.9% at 1 month (p = 0.000092), and in 97.5% at 1 year (p = 0.028), independently of bladder neck preservation (p = 0.388). There was also a significant difference between the two groups concerning urinary reeducation requirement (p = 0.0006), pad use, and urinary quality of life (p = 0.0000002). No anastomosis complication was reported. Conclusions: The SSA significantly improved the rates of immediate, early, and 1-year continence recovery after RALP. These results need further study among larger numbers of patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7757522 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77575222020-12-28 Subsphincteric Anastomosis During Laparoscopic Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Its Positive Impact on Continence Recovery Almeras, Christophe Tollon, Christophe Salin, Ambroise Beauval, Jean-Baptiste Loison, Guillaume Gautier, Jean Romain Ploussard, Guillaume J Endourol Laparoscopy and Robotic Surgery Introduction: To assess the interest of a new sphincter preserving anastomosis technique for continence recovery after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). Materials and Methods: We performed a monocentric single-operator study on 187 consecutive RALP. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (standard anastomosis, until December 2017) and Group 2 (subsphincteric anastomosis [SSA], since January 2018). The SSA consisted in respecting the sphincteric sleeve during the anastomosis suturing only the internal layer of the urethra with the bladder and thereby avoiding the loss of sphincteric length induced by the suture. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative data were prospectively collected and compared. Criteria of continence were as follows: no pad use and complete absence of leakage at catheter removal at 1 month and 1 year. Results: The two groups were comparable in terms of prostate-specific antigen, gland volume, and Gleason score. In Group 2 (SSA), we observed a complete continence recovery in 75.6% at catheter removal (p = 0.0000035), in 82.9% at 1 month (p = 0.000092), and in 97.5% at 1 year (p = 0.028), independently of bladder neck preservation (p = 0.388). There was also a significant difference between the two groups concerning urinary reeducation requirement (p = 0.0006), pad use, and urinary quality of life (p = 0.0000002). No anastomosis complication was reported. Conclusions: The SSA significantly improved the rates of immediate, early, and 1-year continence recovery after RALP. These results need further study among larger numbers of patients. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2020-12-01 2020-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7757522/ /pubmed/32674608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0379 Text en © Christophe Almeras, et al. 2020; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are cited. |
spellingShingle | Laparoscopy and Robotic Surgery Almeras, Christophe Tollon, Christophe Salin, Ambroise Beauval, Jean-Baptiste Loison, Guillaume Gautier, Jean Romain Ploussard, Guillaume Subsphincteric Anastomosis During Laparoscopic Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Its Positive Impact on Continence Recovery |
title | Subsphincteric Anastomosis During Laparoscopic Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Its Positive Impact on Continence Recovery |
title_full | Subsphincteric Anastomosis During Laparoscopic Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Its Positive Impact on Continence Recovery |
title_fullStr | Subsphincteric Anastomosis During Laparoscopic Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Its Positive Impact on Continence Recovery |
title_full_unstemmed | Subsphincteric Anastomosis During Laparoscopic Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Its Positive Impact on Continence Recovery |
title_short | Subsphincteric Anastomosis During Laparoscopic Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Its Positive Impact on Continence Recovery |
title_sort | subsphincteric anastomosis during laparoscopic robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and its positive impact on continence recovery |
topic | Laparoscopy and Robotic Surgery |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7757522/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32674608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0379 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT almeraschristophe subsphinctericanastomosisduringlaparoscopicrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyanditspositiveimpactoncontinencerecovery AT tollonchristophe subsphinctericanastomosisduringlaparoscopicrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyanditspositiveimpactoncontinencerecovery AT salinambroise subsphinctericanastomosisduringlaparoscopicrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyanditspositiveimpactoncontinencerecovery AT beauvaljeanbaptiste subsphinctericanastomosisduringlaparoscopicrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyanditspositiveimpactoncontinencerecovery AT loisonguillaume subsphinctericanastomosisduringlaparoscopicrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyanditspositiveimpactoncontinencerecovery AT gautierjeanromain subsphinctericanastomosisduringlaparoscopicrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyanditspositiveimpactoncontinencerecovery AT ploussardguillaume subsphinctericanastomosisduringlaparoscopicrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyanditspositiveimpactoncontinencerecovery |