Cargando…

Subsphincteric Anastomosis During Laparoscopic Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Its Positive Impact on Continence Recovery

Introduction: To assess the interest of a new sphincter preserving anastomosis technique for continence recovery after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). Materials and Methods: We performed a monocentric single-operator study on 187 consecutive RALP. Patients were divided into...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Almeras, Christophe, Tollon, Christophe, Salin, Ambroise, Beauval, Jean-Baptiste, Loison, Guillaume, Gautier, Jean Romain, Ploussard, Guillaume
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7757522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32674608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0379
_version_ 1783626759080509440
author Almeras, Christophe
Tollon, Christophe
Salin, Ambroise
Beauval, Jean-Baptiste
Loison, Guillaume
Gautier, Jean Romain
Ploussard, Guillaume
author_facet Almeras, Christophe
Tollon, Christophe
Salin, Ambroise
Beauval, Jean-Baptiste
Loison, Guillaume
Gautier, Jean Romain
Ploussard, Guillaume
author_sort Almeras, Christophe
collection PubMed
description Introduction: To assess the interest of a new sphincter preserving anastomosis technique for continence recovery after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). Materials and Methods: We performed a monocentric single-operator study on 187 consecutive RALP. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (standard anastomosis, until December 2017) and Group 2 (subsphincteric anastomosis [SSA], since January 2018). The SSA consisted in respecting the sphincteric sleeve during the anastomosis suturing only the internal layer of the urethra with the bladder and thereby avoiding the loss of sphincteric length induced by the suture. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative data were prospectively collected and compared. Criteria of continence were as follows: no pad use and complete absence of leakage at catheter removal at 1 month and 1 year. Results: The two groups were comparable in terms of prostate-specific antigen, gland volume, and Gleason score. In Group 2 (SSA), we observed a complete continence recovery in 75.6% at catheter removal (p = 0.0000035), in 82.9% at 1 month (p = 0.000092), and in 97.5% at 1 year (p = 0.028), independently of bladder neck preservation (p = 0.388). There was also a significant difference between the two groups concerning urinary reeducation requirement (p = 0.0006), pad use, and urinary quality of life (p = 0.0000002). No anastomosis complication was reported. Conclusions: The SSA significantly improved the rates of immediate, early, and 1-year continence recovery after RALP. These results need further study among larger numbers of patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7757522
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77575222020-12-28 Subsphincteric Anastomosis During Laparoscopic Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Its Positive Impact on Continence Recovery Almeras, Christophe Tollon, Christophe Salin, Ambroise Beauval, Jean-Baptiste Loison, Guillaume Gautier, Jean Romain Ploussard, Guillaume J Endourol Laparoscopy and Robotic Surgery Introduction: To assess the interest of a new sphincter preserving anastomosis technique for continence recovery after robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy (RALP). Materials and Methods: We performed a monocentric single-operator study on 187 consecutive RALP. Patients were divided into two groups: Group 1 (standard anastomosis, until December 2017) and Group 2 (subsphincteric anastomosis [SSA], since January 2018). The SSA consisted in respecting the sphincteric sleeve during the anastomosis suturing only the internal layer of the urethra with the bladder and thereby avoiding the loss of sphincteric length induced by the suture. Pre-, intra-, and postoperative data were prospectively collected and compared. Criteria of continence were as follows: no pad use and complete absence of leakage at catheter removal at 1 month and 1 year. Results: The two groups were comparable in terms of prostate-specific antigen, gland volume, and Gleason score. In Group 2 (SSA), we observed a complete continence recovery in 75.6% at catheter removal (p = 0.0000035), in 82.9% at 1 month (p = 0.000092), and in 97.5% at 1 year (p = 0.028), independently of bladder neck preservation (p = 0.388). There was also a significant difference between the two groups concerning urinary reeducation requirement (p = 0.0006), pad use, and urinary quality of life (p = 0.0000002). No anastomosis complication was reported. Conclusions: The SSA significantly improved the rates of immediate, early, and 1-year continence recovery after RALP. These results need further study among larger numbers of patients. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2020-12-01 2020-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7757522/ /pubmed/32674608 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0379 Text en © Christophe Almeras, et al. 2020; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are cited.
spellingShingle Laparoscopy and Robotic Surgery
Almeras, Christophe
Tollon, Christophe
Salin, Ambroise
Beauval, Jean-Baptiste
Loison, Guillaume
Gautier, Jean Romain
Ploussard, Guillaume
Subsphincteric Anastomosis During Laparoscopic Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Its Positive Impact on Continence Recovery
title Subsphincteric Anastomosis During Laparoscopic Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Its Positive Impact on Continence Recovery
title_full Subsphincteric Anastomosis During Laparoscopic Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Its Positive Impact on Continence Recovery
title_fullStr Subsphincteric Anastomosis During Laparoscopic Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Its Positive Impact on Continence Recovery
title_full_unstemmed Subsphincteric Anastomosis During Laparoscopic Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Its Positive Impact on Continence Recovery
title_short Subsphincteric Anastomosis During Laparoscopic Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy and Its Positive Impact on Continence Recovery
title_sort subsphincteric anastomosis during laparoscopic robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and its positive impact on continence recovery
topic Laparoscopy and Robotic Surgery
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7757522/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32674608
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/end.2020.0379
work_keys_str_mv AT almeraschristophe subsphinctericanastomosisduringlaparoscopicrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyanditspositiveimpactoncontinencerecovery
AT tollonchristophe subsphinctericanastomosisduringlaparoscopicrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyanditspositiveimpactoncontinencerecovery
AT salinambroise subsphinctericanastomosisduringlaparoscopicrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyanditspositiveimpactoncontinencerecovery
AT beauvaljeanbaptiste subsphinctericanastomosisduringlaparoscopicrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyanditspositiveimpactoncontinencerecovery
AT loisonguillaume subsphinctericanastomosisduringlaparoscopicrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyanditspositiveimpactoncontinencerecovery
AT gautierjeanromain subsphinctericanastomosisduringlaparoscopicrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyanditspositiveimpactoncontinencerecovery
AT ploussardguillaume subsphinctericanastomosisduringlaparoscopicrobotassistedradicalprostatectomyanditspositiveimpactoncontinencerecovery