Cargando…
Comparing Beta Cell Preservation Across Clinical Trials in Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes
Several immunotherapies have demonstrated endogenous insulin preservation in recent-onset type 1 diabetes (T1D). We considered the primary results of rituximab, abatacept, teplizumab, alefacept, high-dose antithymocyte globulin (ATG), low-dose ATG, and low-dose ATG ± granulocyte-colony–stimulating f...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7757538/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32833543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2020.0305 |
_version_ | 1783626760766619648 |
---|---|
author | Jacobsen, Laura M. Bundy, Brian N. Greco, Madison N. Schatz, Desmond A. Atkinson, Mark A. Brusko, Todd M. Mathews, Clayton E. Herold, Kevan C. Gitelman, Stephen E. Krischer, Jeffrey P. Haller, Michael J. |
author_facet | Jacobsen, Laura M. Bundy, Brian N. Greco, Madison N. Schatz, Desmond A. Atkinson, Mark A. Brusko, Todd M. Mathews, Clayton E. Herold, Kevan C. Gitelman, Stephen E. Krischer, Jeffrey P. Haller, Michael J. |
author_sort | Jacobsen, Laura M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Several immunotherapies have demonstrated endogenous insulin preservation in recent-onset type 1 diabetes (T1D). We considered the primary results of rituximab, abatacept, teplizumab, alefacept, high-dose antithymocyte globulin (ATG), low-dose ATG, and low-dose ATG ± granulocyte-colony–stimulating factor trials in an attempt to rank the effectiveness of the agents studied. C-peptide 2-h area under the curve means were modeled using analysis of covariance. The experimental treatment group effect for each study, compared with its internal control, was estimated after adjusting for baseline C-peptide and age. Percentage increase in C-peptide over placebo and the absolute difference within study were calculated to compare and contrast effect size among interventions. Low-dose ATG (55% and 103%) and teplizumab (48% and 63%) ranked highest in C-peptide preservation at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Low-dose ATG and teplizumab show the greatest impact on C-peptide preservation among recent new-onset T1D studies; these should be further explored as core immunotherapies in the T1D prevention setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7757538 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77575382020-12-28 Comparing Beta Cell Preservation Across Clinical Trials in Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes Jacobsen, Laura M. Bundy, Brian N. Greco, Madison N. Schatz, Desmond A. Atkinson, Mark A. Brusko, Todd M. Mathews, Clayton E. Herold, Kevan C. Gitelman, Stephen E. Krischer, Jeffrey P. Haller, Michael J. Diabetes Technol Ther Brief Reports Several immunotherapies have demonstrated endogenous insulin preservation in recent-onset type 1 diabetes (T1D). We considered the primary results of rituximab, abatacept, teplizumab, alefacept, high-dose antithymocyte globulin (ATG), low-dose ATG, and low-dose ATG ± granulocyte-colony–stimulating factor trials in an attempt to rank the effectiveness of the agents studied. C-peptide 2-h area under the curve means were modeled using analysis of covariance. The experimental treatment group effect for each study, compared with its internal control, was estimated after adjusting for baseline C-peptide and age. Percentage increase in C-peptide over placebo and the absolute difference within study were calculated to compare and contrast effect size among interventions. Low-dose ATG (55% and 103%) and teplizumab (48% and 63%) ranked highest in C-peptide preservation at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Low-dose ATG and teplizumab show the greatest impact on C-peptide preservation among recent new-onset T1D studies; these should be further explored as core immunotherapies in the T1D prevention setting. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2020-12-01 2020-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7757538/ /pubmed/32833543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2020.0305 Text en © Laura M. Jacobsen, et al., 2020; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Brief Reports Jacobsen, Laura M. Bundy, Brian N. Greco, Madison N. Schatz, Desmond A. Atkinson, Mark A. Brusko, Todd M. Mathews, Clayton E. Herold, Kevan C. Gitelman, Stephen E. Krischer, Jeffrey P. Haller, Michael J. Comparing Beta Cell Preservation Across Clinical Trials in Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes |
title | Comparing Beta Cell Preservation Across Clinical Trials in Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes |
title_full | Comparing Beta Cell Preservation Across Clinical Trials in Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes |
title_fullStr | Comparing Beta Cell Preservation Across Clinical Trials in Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing Beta Cell Preservation Across Clinical Trials in Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes |
title_short | Comparing Beta Cell Preservation Across Clinical Trials in Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes |
title_sort | comparing beta cell preservation across clinical trials in recent-onset type 1 diabetes |
topic | Brief Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7757538/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32833543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2020.0305 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jacobsenlauram comparingbetacellpreservationacrossclinicaltrialsinrecentonsettype1diabetes AT bundybriann comparingbetacellpreservationacrossclinicaltrialsinrecentonsettype1diabetes AT grecomadisonn comparingbetacellpreservationacrossclinicaltrialsinrecentonsettype1diabetes AT schatzdesmonda comparingbetacellpreservationacrossclinicaltrialsinrecentonsettype1diabetes AT atkinsonmarka comparingbetacellpreservationacrossclinicaltrialsinrecentonsettype1diabetes AT bruskotoddm comparingbetacellpreservationacrossclinicaltrialsinrecentonsettype1diabetes AT mathewsclaytone comparingbetacellpreservationacrossclinicaltrialsinrecentonsettype1diabetes AT heroldkevanc comparingbetacellpreservationacrossclinicaltrialsinrecentonsettype1diabetes AT gitelmanstephene comparingbetacellpreservationacrossclinicaltrialsinrecentonsettype1diabetes AT krischerjeffreyp comparingbetacellpreservationacrossclinicaltrialsinrecentonsettype1diabetes AT hallermichaelj comparingbetacellpreservationacrossclinicaltrialsinrecentonsettype1diabetes |