Cargando…

Comparing Beta Cell Preservation Across Clinical Trials in Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes

Several immunotherapies have demonstrated endogenous insulin preservation in recent-onset type 1 diabetes (T1D). We considered the primary results of rituximab, abatacept, teplizumab, alefacept, high-dose antithymocyte globulin (ATG), low-dose ATG, and low-dose ATG ± granulocyte-colony–stimulating f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jacobsen, Laura M., Bundy, Brian N., Greco, Madison N., Schatz, Desmond A., Atkinson, Mark A., Brusko, Todd M., Mathews, Clayton E., Herold, Kevan C., Gitelman, Stephen E., Krischer, Jeffrey P., Haller, Michael J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7757538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32833543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2020.0305
_version_ 1783626760766619648
author Jacobsen, Laura M.
Bundy, Brian N.
Greco, Madison N.
Schatz, Desmond A.
Atkinson, Mark A.
Brusko, Todd M.
Mathews, Clayton E.
Herold, Kevan C.
Gitelman, Stephen E.
Krischer, Jeffrey P.
Haller, Michael J.
author_facet Jacobsen, Laura M.
Bundy, Brian N.
Greco, Madison N.
Schatz, Desmond A.
Atkinson, Mark A.
Brusko, Todd M.
Mathews, Clayton E.
Herold, Kevan C.
Gitelman, Stephen E.
Krischer, Jeffrey P.
Haller, Michael J.
author_sort Jacobsen, Laura M.
collection PubMed
description Several immunotherapies have demonstrated endogenous insulin preservation in recent-onset type 1 diabetes (T1D). We considered the primary results of rituximab, abatacept, teplizumab, alefacept, high-dose antithymocyte globulin (ATG), low-dose ATG, and low-dose ATG ± granulocyte-colony–stimulating factor trials in an attempt to rank the effectiveness of the agents studied. C-peptide 2-h area under the curve means were modeled using analysis of covariance. The experimental treatment group effect for each study, compared with its internal control, was estimated after adjusting for baseline C-peptide and age. Percentage increase in C-peptide over placebo and the absolute difference within study were calculated to compare and contrast effect size among interventions. Low-dose ATG (55% and 103%) and teplizumab (48% and 63%) ranked highest in C-peptide preservation at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Low-dose ATG and teplizumab show the greatest impact on C-peptide preservation among recent new-onset T1D studies; these should be further explored as core immunotherapies in the T1D prevention setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7757538
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77575382020-12-28 Comparing Beta Cell Preservation Across Clinical Trials in Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes Jacobsen, Laura M. Bundy, Brian N. Greco, Madison N. Schatz, Desmond A. Atkinson, Mark A. Brusko, Todd M. Mathews, Clayton E. Herold, Kevan C. Gitelman, Stephen E. Krischer, Jeffrey P. Haller, Michael J. Diabetes Technol Ther Brief Reports Several immunotherapies have demonstrated endogenous insulin preservation in recent-onset type 1 diabetes (T1D). We considered the primary results of rituximab, abatacept, teplizumab, alefacept, high-dose antithymocyte globulin (ATG), low-dose ATG, and low-dose ATG ± granulocyte-colony–stimulating factor trials in an attempt to rank the effectiveness of the agents studied. C-peptide 2-h area under the curve means were modeled using analysis of covariance. The experimental treatment group effect for each study, compared with its internal control, was estimated after adjusting for baseline C-peptide and age. Percentage increase in C-peptide over placebo and the absolute difference within study were calculated to compare and contrast effect size among interventions. Low-dose ATG (55% and 103%) and teplizumab (48% and 63%) ranked highest in C-peptide preservation at 1 and 2 years, respectively. Low-dose ATG and teplizumab show the greatest impact on C-peptide preservation among recent new-onset T1D studies; these should be further explored as core immunotherapies in the T1D prevention setting. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2020-12-01 2020-12-07 /pmc/articles/PMC7757538/ /pubmed/32833543 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2020.0305 Text en © Laura M. Jacobsen, et al., 2020; Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Brief Reports
Jacobsen, Laura M.
Bundy, Brian N.
Greco, Madison N.
Schatz, Desmond A.
Atkinson, Mark A.
Brusko, Todd M.
Mathews, Clayton E.
Herold, Kevan C.
Gitelman, Stephen E.
Krischer, Jeffrey P.
Haller, Michael J.
Comparing Beta Cell Preservation Across Clinical Trials in Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes
title Comparing Beta Cell Preservation Across Clinical Trials in Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes
title_full Comparing Beta Cell Preservation Across Clinical Trials in Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes
title_fullStr Comparing Beta Cell Preservation Across Clinical Trials in Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes
title_full_unstemmed Comparing Beta Cell Preservation Across Clinical Trials in Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes
title_short Comparing Beta Cell Preservation Across Clinical Trials in Recent-Onset Type 1 Diabetes
title_sort comparing beta cell preservation across clinical trials in recent-onset type 1 diabetes
topic Brief Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7757538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32833543
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/dia.2020.0305
work_keys_str_mv AT jacobsenlauram comparingbetacellpreservationacrossclinicaltrialsinrecentonsettype1diabetes
AT bundybriann comparingbetacellpreservationacrossclinicaltrialsinrecentonsettype1diabetes
AT grecomadisonn comparingbetacellpreservationacrossclinicaltrialsinrecentonsettype1diabetes
AT schatzdesmonda comparingbetacellpreservationacrossclinicaltrialsinrecentonsettype1diabetes
AT atkinsonmarka comparingbetacellpreservationacrossclinicaltrialsinrecentonsettype1diabetes
AT bruskotoddm comparingbetacellpreservationacrossclinicaltrialsinrecentonsettype1diabetes
AT mathewsclaytone comparingbetacellpreservationacrossclinicaltrialsinrecentonsettype1diabetes
AT heroldkevanc comparingbetacellpreservationacrossclinicaltrialsinrecentonsettype1diabetes
AT gitelmanstephene comparingbetacellpreservationacrossclinicaltrialsinrecentonsettype1diabetes
AT krischerjeffreyp comparingbetacellpreservationacrossclinicaltrialsinrecentonsettype1diabetes
AT hallermichaelj comparingbetacellpreservationacrossclinicaltrialsinrecentonsettype1diabetes