Cargando…

Wixela Inhub: Dosing Performance In Vitro and Inhaled Flow Rates in Healthy Subjects and Patients Compared with Advair Diskus

Background: Wixela™ Inhub™ is a fluticasone propionate/salmeterol dry powder inhaler developed as a generic equivalent of Advair Diskus(®) for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Wixela Inhub and Advair Diskus are comparable in terms of functionality, user inter...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cooper, Andrew, Parker, James, Berry, Mark, Wallace, Róisín, Ward, Jon, Allan, Richard
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7757596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32429788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2019.1584
_version_ 1783626768097214464
author Cooper, Andrew
Parker, James
Berry, Mark
Wallace, Róisín
Ward, Jon
Allan, Richard
author_facet Cooper, Andrew
Parker, James
Berry, Mark
Wallace, Róisín
Ward, Jon
Allan, Richard
author_sort Cooper, Andrew
collection PubMed
description Background: Wixela™ Inhub™ is a fluticasone propionate/salmeterol dry powder inhaler developed as a generic equivalent of Advair Diskus(®) for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Wixela Inhub and Advair Diskus are comparable in terms of functionality, user interface, and device resistance. The primary objectives of the studies were to evaluate in vitro dose delivery with Wixela Inhub compared with Advair Diskus at relevant flow rates and to explore inhalation profiles generated by patients with asthma or COPD. Methods: In vitro studies: Emitted dose (ED) and individual dose aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) were measured at flow rates ranging from 30 to 90 L min(−1). Patient inhalation study: Inhalation profile recording was conducted three times in each patient (40 children with asthma, 14 adults with asthma, and 14 adults with severe-to-very-severe COPD) with an empty Inhub in an open-label study. The primary endpoint was peak inhaled flow rate (PIFR). An additional endpoint was peak pressure drop. Results: In vitro studies: ED and APSD delivered from Wixela Inhub showed low flow dependency across the patient-relevant flow-rate range. Wixela Inhub gave in vitro performance comparable with Advair Diskus for all strengths and flow rates. Patient inhalation study: For Inhub, mean PIFR was lowest for children with asthma ages 4 to 7 years (50.6 L min(−1)) and highest for adults with asthma (74.8 L min(−1)). For adults with severe-to-very-severe COPD, mean PIFR was 69.5 L min(−1) with Inhub. The PIFRs observed with Diskus were higher than those with Inhub, consistent with slightly higher resistance measured in vitro. The difference in resistance did not impact demonstration of bioequivalence and does not impact substitutability of the product. Peak pressure drop values were comparable between Diskus and Inhub. Conclusions: Comparable in vitro performance of Wixela Inhub to Advair Diskus confirmed that Wixela Inhub is a generic equivalent to Advair Diskus across all patient groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7757596
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77575962020-12-28 Wixela Inhub: Dosing Performance In Vitro and Inhaled Flow Rates in Healthy Subjects and Patients Compared with Advair Diskus Cooper, Andrew Parker, James Berry, Mark Wallace, Róisín Ward, Jon Allan, Richard J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv Original Research Background: Wixela™ Inhub™ is a fluticasone propionate/salmeterol dry powder inhaler developed as a generic equivalent of Advair Diskus(®) for the treatment of asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Wixela Inhub and Advair Diskus are comparable in terms of functionality, user interface, and device resistance. The primary objectives of the studies were to evaluate in vitro dose delivery with Wixela Inhub compared with Advair Diskus at relevant flow rates and to explore inhalation profiles generated by patients with asthma or COPD. Methods: In vitro studies: Emitted dose (ED) and individual dose aerodynamic particle size distribution (APSD) were measured at flow rates ranging from 30 to 90 L min(−1). Patient inhalation study: Inhalation profile recording was conducted three times in each patient (40 children with asthma, 14 adults with asthma, and 14 adults with severe-to-very-severe COPD) with an empty Inhub in an open-label study. The primary endpoint was peak inhaled flow rate (PIFR). An additional endpoint was peak pressure drop. Results: In vitro studies: ED and APSD delivered from Wixela Inhub showed low flow dependency across the patient-relevant flow-rate range. Wixela Inhub gave in vitro performance comparable with Advair Diskus for all strengths and flow rates. Patient inhalation study: For Inhub, mean PIFR was lowest for children with asthma ages 4 to 7 years (50.6 L min(−1)) and highest for adults with asthma (74.8 L min(−1)). For adults with severe-to-very-severe COPD, mean PIFR was 69.5 L min(−1) with Inhub. The PIFRs observed with Diskus were higher than those with Inhub, consistent with slightly higher resistance measured in vitro. The difference in resistance did not impact demonstration of bioequivalence and does not impact substitutability of the product. Peak pressure drop values were comparable between Diskus and Inhub. Conclusions: Comparable in vitro performance of Wixela Inhub to Advair Diskus confirmed that Wixela Inhub is a generic equivalent to Advair Diskus across all patient groups. Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2020-12-01 2020-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7757596/ /pubmed/32429788 http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2019.1584 Text en © Andrew Cooper, et al., 2020. Published by Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. This Open Access article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Cooper, Andrew
Parker, James
Berry, Mark
Wallace, Róisín
Ward, Jon
Allan, Richard
Wixela Inhub: Dosing Performance In Vitro and Inhaled Flow Rates in Healthy Subjects and Patients Compared with Advair Diskus
title Wixela Inhub: Dosing Performance In Vitro and Inhaled Flow Rates in Healthy Subjects and Patients Compared with Advair Diskus
title_full Wixela Inhub: Dosing Performance In Vitro and Inhaled Flow Rates in Healthy Subjects and Patients Compared with Advair Diskus
title_fullStr Wixela Inhub: Dosing Performance In Vitro and Inhaled Flow Rates in Healthy Subjects and Patients Compared with Advair Diskus
title_full_unstemmed Wixela Inhub: Dosing Performance In Vitro and Inhaled Flow Rates in Healthy Subjects and Patients Compared with Advair Diskus
title_short Wixela Inhub: Dosing Performance In Vitro and Inhaled Flow Rates in Healthy Subjects and Patients Compared with Advair Diskus
title_sort wixela inhub: dosing performance in vitro and inhaled flow rates in healthy subjects and patients compared with advair diskus
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7757596/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32429788
http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/jamp.2019.1584
work_keys_str_mv AT cooperandrew wixelainhubdosingperformanceinvitroandinhaledflowratesinhealthysubjectsandpatientscomparedwithadvairdiskus
AT parkerjames wixelainhubdosingperformanceinvitroandinhaledflowratesinhealthysubjectsandpatientscomparedwithadvairdiskus
AT berrymark wixelainhubdosingperformanceinvitroandinhaledflowratesinhealthysubjectsandpatientscomparedwithadvairdiskus
AT wallaceroisin wixelainhubdosingperformanceinvitroandinhaledflowratesinhealthysubjectsandpatientscomparedwithadvairdiskus
AT wardjon wixelainhubdosingperformanceinvitroandinhaledflowratesinhealthysubjectsandpatientscomparedwithadvairdiskus
AT allanrichard wixelainhubdosingperformanceinvitroandinhaledflowratesinhealthysubjectsandpatientscomparedwithadvairdiskus