Cargando…

Selection Criteria for Cochlear Implantation in the United Kingdom and Flanders: Toward a Less Restrictive Standard

The impact of the newly introduced cochlear implantation criteria of the United Kingdom and Flanders (Dutch speaking part of Belgium) was examined in the patient population of a tertiary referral center in the Netherlands. We compared the patients who would be included/excluded under the new versus...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Straaten, Tirza F. K., Briaire, Jeroen J., Vickers, Deborah, Boermans, Peter Paul B. M., Frijns, Johan H. M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7757743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32590629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000901
_version_ 1783626795252187136
author van der Straaten, Tirza F. K.
Briaire, Jeroen J.
Vickers, Deborah
Boermans, Peter Paul B. M.
Frijns, Johan H. M.
author_facet van der Straaten, Tirza F. K.
Briaire, Jeroen J.
Vickers, Deborah
Boermans, Peter Paul B. M.
Frijns, Johan H. M.
author_sort van der Straaten, Tirza F. K.
collection PubMed
description The impact of the newly introduced cochlear implantation criteria of the United Kingdom and Flanders (Dutch speaking part of Belgium) was examined in the patient population of a tertiary referral center in the Netherlands. We compared the patients who would be included/excluded under the new versus old criteria in relation to the actual improvement in speech understanding after implantation in our center. We also performed a sensitivity analysis to examine the effectiveness of the different preoperative assessment approaches used in the United Kingdom and Flanders. DESIGN: The selection criteria were based on preoperative pure-tone audiometry at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz and a speech perception test (SPT) with and without best-aided hearing aids. Postoperatively, the same SPT was conducted to assess the benefit in speech understanding. RESULTS: The newly introduced criteria in Flanders and the United Kingdom were less restrictive, resulting in greater percentages of patients implanted with CI (increase of 30%), and sensitivity increase of 31%. The preoperative best-aided SPT, used by both countries, had the highest diagnostic ability to indicate a postoperative improvement of speech understanding. We observed that patient selection was previously dominated by the pure-tone audiometry criteria in both countries, whereas speech understanding became more important in their new criteria. Among patients excluded by the new criteria, seven of eight (the United Kingdom and Flanders) did exhibit improved postoperative speech understanding. CONCLUSIONS: The new selection criteria of the United Kingdom and Flanders led to increased numbers of postlingually deafened adults benefitting from CI. The new British and Flemish criteria depended on the best-aided SPT with the highest diagnostic ability. Notably, the new criteria still led to the rejection of candidates who would be expected to gain considerably in speech understanding after implantation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7757743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77577432020-12-30 Selection Criteria for Cochlear Implantation in the United Kingdom and Flanders: Toward a Less Restrictive Standard van der Straaten, Tirza F. K. Briaire, Jeroen J. Vickers, Deborah Boermans, Peter Paul B. M. Frijns, Johan H. M. Ear Hear Research Article The impact of the newly introduced cochlear implantation criteria of the United Kingdom and Flanders (Dutch speaking part of Belgium) was examined in the patient population of a tertiary referral center in the Netherlands. We compared the patients who would be included/excluded under the new versus old criteria in relation to the actual improvement in speech understanding after implantation in our center. We also performed a sensitivity analysis to examine the effectiveness of the different preoperative assessment approaches used in the United Kingdom and Flanders. DESIGN: The selection criteria were based on preoperative pure-tone audiometry at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz and a speech perception test (SPT) with and without best-aided hearing aids. Postoperatively, the same SPT was conducted to assess the benefit in speech understanding. RESULTS: The newly introduced criteria in Flanders and the United Kingdom were less restrictive, resulting in greater percentages of patients implanted with CI (increase of 30%), and sensitivity increase of 31%. The preoperative best-aided SPT, used by both countries, had the highest diagnostic ability to indicate a postoperative improvement of speech understanding. We observed that patient selection was previously dominated by the pure-tone audiometry criteria in both countries, whereas speech understanding became more important in their new criteria. Among patients excluded by the new criteria, seven of eight (the United Kingdom and Flanders) did exhibit improved postoperative speech understanding. CONCLUSIONS: The new selection criteria of the United Kingdom and Flanders led to increased numbers of postlingually deafened adults benefitting from CI. The new British and Flemish criteria depended on the best-aided SPT with the highest diagnostic ability. Notably, the new criteria still led to the rejection of candidates who would be expected to gain considerably in speech understanding after implantation. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7757743/ /pubmed/32590629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000901 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Ear & Hearing is published on behalf of the American Auditory Society, by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
van der Straaten, Tirza F. K.
Briaire, Jeroen J.
Vickers, Deborah
Boermans, Peter Paul B. M.
Frijns, Johan H. M.
Selection Criteria for Cochlear Implantation in the United Kingdom and Flanders: Toward a Less Restrictive Standard
title Selection Criteria for Cochlear Implantation in the United Kingdom and Flanders: Toward a Less Restrictive Standard
title_full Selection Criteria for Cochlear Implantation in the United Kingdom and Flanders: Toward a Less Restrictive Standard
title_fullStr Selection Criteria for Cochlear Implantation in the United Kingdom and Flanders: Toward a Less Restrictive Standard
title_full_unstemmed Selection Criteria for Cochlear Implantation in the United Kingdom and Flanders: Toward a Less Restrictive Standard
title_short Selection Criteria for Cochlear Implantation in the United Kingdom and Flanders: Toward a Less Restrictive Standard
title_sort selection criteria for cochlear implantation in the united kingdom and flanders: toward a less restrictive standard
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7757743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32590629
http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000901
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderstraatentirzafk selectioncriteriaforcochlearimplantationintheunitedkingdomandflanderstowardalessrestrictivestandard
AT briairejeroenj selectioncriteriaforcochlearimplantationintheunitedkingdomandflanderstowardalessrestrictivestandard
AT vickersdeborah selectioncriteriaforcochlearimplantationintheunitedkingdomandflanderstowardalessrestrictivestandard
AT boermanspeterpaulbm selectioncriteriaforcochlearimplantationintheunitedkingdomandflanderstowardalessrestrictivestandard
AT frijnsjohanhm selectioncriteriaforcochlearimplantationintheunitedkingdomandflanderstowardalessrestrictivestandard