Cargando…
Selection Criteria for Cochlear Implantation in the United Kingdom and Flanders: Toward a Less Restrictive Standard
The impact of the newly introduced cochlear implantation criteria of the United Kingdom and Flanders (Dutch speaking part of Belgium) was examined in the patient population of a tertiary referral center in the Netherlands. We compared the patients who would be included/excluded under the new versus...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Lippincott Williams & Wilkins
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7757743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32590629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000901 |
_version_ | 1783626795252187136 |
---|---|
author | van der Straaten, Tirza F. K. Briaire, Jeroen J. Vickers, Deborah Boermans, Peter Paul B. M. Frijns, Johan H. M. |
author_facet | van der Straaten, Tirza F. K. Briaire, Jeroen J. Vickers, Deborah Boermans, Peter Paul B. M. Frijns, Johan H. M. |
author_sort | van der Straaten, Tirza F. K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The impact of the newly introduced cochlear implantation criteria of the United Kingdom and Flanders (Dutch speaking part of Belgium) was examined in the patient population of a tertiary referral center in the Netherlands. We compared the patients who would be included/excluded under the new versus old criteria in relation to the actual improvement in speech understanding after implantation in our center. We also performed a sensitivity analysis to examine the effectiveness of the different preoperative assessment approaches used in the United Kingdom and Flanders. DESIGN: The selection criteria were based on preoperative pure-tone audiometry at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz and a speech perception test (SPT) with and without best-aided hearing aids. Postoperatively, the same SPT was conducted to assess the benefit in speech understanding. RESULTS: The newly introduced criteria in Flanders and the United Kingdom were less restrictive, resulting in greater percentages of patients implanted with CI (increase of 30%), and sensitivity increase of 31%. The preoperative best-aided SPT, used by both countries, had the highest diagnostic ability to indicate a postoperative improvement of speech understanding. We observed that patient selection was previously dominated by the pure-tone audiometry criteria in both countries, whereas speech understanding became more important in their new criteria. Among patients excluded by the new criteria, seven of eight (the United Kingdom and Flanders) did exhibit improved postoperative speech understanding. CONCLUSIONS: The new selection criteria of the United Kingdom and Flanders led to increased numbers of postlingually deafened adults benefitting from CI. The new British and Flemish criteria depended on the best-aided SPT with the highest diagnostic ability. Notably, the new criteria still led to the rejection of candidates who would be expected to gain considerably in speech understanding after implantation. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7757743 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Lippincott Williams & Wilkins |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77577432020-12-30 Selection Criteria for Cochlear Implantation in the United Kingdom and Flanders: Toward a Less Restrictive Standard van der Straaten, Tirza F. K. Briaire, Jeroen J. Vickers, Deborah Boermans, Peter Paul B. M. Frijns, Johan H. M. Ear Hear Research Article The impact of the newly introduced cochlear implantation criteria of the United Kingdom and Flanders (Dutch speaking part of Belgium) was examined in the patient population of a tertiary referral center in the Netherlands. We compared the patients who would be included/excluded under the new versus old criteria in relation to the actual improvement in speech understanding after implantation in our center. We also performed a sensitivity analysis to examine the effectiveness of the different preoperative assessment approaches used in the United Kingdom and Flanders. DESIGN: The selection criteria were based on preoperative pure-tone audiometry at 0.5, 1, 2, and 4 kHz and a speech perception test (SPT) with and without best-aided hearing aids. Postoperatively, the same SPT was conducted to assess the benefit in speech understanding. RESULTS: The newly introduced criteria in Flanders and the United Kingdom were less restrictive, resulting in greater percentages of patients implanted with CI (increase of 30%), and sensitivity increase of 31%. The preoperative best-aided SPT, used by both countries, had the highest diagnostic ability to indicate a postoperative improvement of speech understanding. We observed that patient selection was previously dominated by the pure-tone audiometry criteria in both countries, whereas speech understanding became more important in their new criteria. Among patients excluded by the new criteria, seven of eight (the United Kingdom and Flanders) did exhibit improved postoperative speech understanding. CONCLUSIONS: The new selection criteria of the United Kingdom and Flanders led to increased numbers of postlingually deafened adults benefitting from CI. The new British and Flemish criteria depended on the best-aided SPT with the highest diagnostic ability. Notably, the new criteria still led to the rejection of candidates who would be expected to gain considerably in speech understanding after implantation. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins 2020-06-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7757743/ /pubmed/32590629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000901 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Ear & Hearing is published on behalf of the American Auditory Society, by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article van der Straaten, Tirza F. K. Briaire, Jeroen J. Vickers, Deborah Boermans, Peter Paul B. M. Frijns, Johan H. M. Selection Criteria for Cochlear Implantation in the United Kingdom and Flanders: Toward a Less Restrictive Standard |
title | Selection Criteria for Cochlear Implantation in the United Kingdom and Flanders: Toward a Less Restrictive Standard |
title_full | Selection Criteria for Cochlear Implantation in the United Kingdom and Flanders: Toward a Less Restrictive Standard |
title_fullStr | Selection Criteria for Cochlear Implantation in the United Kingdom and Flanders: Toward a Less Restrictive Standard |
title_full_unstemmed | Selection Criteria for Cochlear Implantation in the United Kingdom and Flanders: Toward a Less Restrictive Standard |
title_short | Selection Criteria for Cochlear Implantation in the United Kingdom and Flanders: Toward a Less Restrictive Standard |
title_sort | selection criteria for cochlear implantation in the united kingdom and flanders: toward a less restrictive standard |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7757743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32590629 http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/AUD.0000000000000901 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderstraatentirzafk selectioncriteriaforcochlearimplantationintheunitedkingdomandflanderstowardalessrestrictivestandard AT briairejeroenj selectioncriteriaforcochlearimplantationintheunitedkingdomandflanderstowardalessrestrictivestandard AT vickersdeborah selectioncriteriaforcochlearimplantationintheunitedkingdomandflanderstowardalessrestrictivestandard AT boermanspeterpaulbm selectioncriteriaforcochlearimplantationintheunitedkingdomandflanderstowardalessrestrictivestandard AT frijnsjohanhm selectioncriteriaforcochlearimplantationintheunitedkingdomandflanderstowardalessrestrictivestandard |