Cargando…

The Use of Porous Titanium Coating and the Largest Possible Head Do Not Affect Early Cup Fixation: A 2-Year Report from a Randomized Controlled Trial

Cups are more frequently revised than stems after uncemented total hip arthroplasty, which warrants the development of cup surfaces that provide long-lasting, stable fixation. Large heads have become popular with the aim of reducing dislocation rates, but they generate greater frictional torque that...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tsikandylakis, Georgios, Mortensen, Kristian R.L., Gromov, Kirill, Troelsen, Anders, Malchau, Henrik, Mohaddes, Maziar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7757840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33376932
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00107
_version_ 1783626810709245952
author Tsikandylakis, Georgios
Mortensen, Kristian R.L.
Gromov, Kirill
Troelsen, Anders
Malchau, Henrik
Mohaddes, Maziar
author_facet Tsikandylakis, Georgios
Mortensen, Kristian R.L.
Gromov, Kirill
Troelsen, Anders
Malchau, Henrik
Mohaddes, Maziar
author_sort Tsikandylakis, Georgios
collection PubMed
description Cups are more frequently revised than stems after uncemented total hip arthroplasty, which warrants the development of cup surfaces that provide long-lasting, stable fixation. Large heads have become popular with the aim of reducing dislocation rates, but they generate greater frictional torque that may compromise cup fixation. We aimed to investigate (1) if a novel porous titanium surface provides superior cup fixation when compared with a porous plasma spray (PPS) surface and (2) if the use of the largest possible head compromises cup fixation when compared with a 32-mm head. METHODS: Ninety-six patients were randomized to receive either a cup with a porous titanium coating (PTC) or a cup with PPS. A second randomization was performed to either the largest possible (36 to 44-mm) or a 32-mm head in metal-on-vitamin-E-infused polyethylene bearings. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) examinations were obtained postoperatively at 3, 12, and 24 months. The primary outcome was proximal cup migration when comparing the 2 cup surfaces and also when comparing the largest possible head with the 32-mm head. The patients were followed for 2 years. RESULTS: The median (and interquartile range) proximal cup migration was 0.15 mm (0.02 to 0.32 mm) for the PTC cup and 0.21 mm (0.11 to 0.34 mm) for the PPS cup. The largest possible head had a proximal cup migration of 0.15 mm (0.09 to 0.31 mm), and the 32-mm head had a proximal cup migration of 0.20 mm (0.04 to 0.35 mm). There were no significant differences between the cup surface (p = 0.378) or the head size (p = 0.693) groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early cup fixation was not superior with the novel PTC cup; the use of the largest possible head (36 to 44 mm) did not compromise early cup fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7757840
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77578402020-12-28 The Use of Porous Titanium Coating and the Largest Possible Head Do Not Affect Early Cup Fixation: A 2-Year Report from a Randomized Controlled Trial Tsikandylakis, Georgios Mortensen, Kristian R.L. Gromov, Kirill Troelsen, Anders Malchau, Henrik Mohaddes, Maziar JB JS Open Access Scientific Articles Cups are more frequently revised than stems after uncemented total hip arthroplasty, which warrants the development of cup surfaces that provide long-lasting, stable fixation. Large heads have become popular with the aim of reducing dislocation rates, but they generate greater frictional torque that may compromise cup fixation. We aimed to investigate (1) if a novel porous titanium surface provides superior cup fixation when compared with a porous plasma spray (PPS) surface and (2) if the use of the largest possible head compromises cup fixation when compared with a 32-mm head. METHODS: Ninety-six patients were randomized to receive either a cup with a porous titanium coating (PTC) or a cup with PPS. A second randomization was performed to either the largest possible (36 to 44-mm) or a 32-mm head in metal-on-vitamin-E-infused polyethylene bearings. Roentgen stereophotogrammetric analysis (RSA) examinations were obtained postoperatively at 3, 12, and 24 months. The primary outcome was proximal cup migration when comparing the 2 cup surfaces and also when comparing the largest possible head with the 32-mm head. The patients were followed for 2 years. RESULTS: The median (and interquartile range) proximal cup migration was 0.15 mm (0.02 to 0.32 mm) for the PTC cup and 0.21 mm (0.11 to 0.34 mm) for the PPS cup. The largest possible head had a proximal cup migration of 0.15 mm (0.09 to 0.31 mm), and the 32-mm head had a proximal cup migration of 0.20 mm (0.04 to 0.35 mm). There were no significant differences between the cup surface (p = 0.378) or the head size (p = 0.693) groups. CONCLUSIONS: Early cup fixation was not superior with the novel PTC cup; the use of the largest possible head (36 to 44 mm) did not compromise early cup fixation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic Level I. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Inc. 2020-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7757840/ /pubmed/33376932 http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00107 Text en Copyright © 2020 The Authors. Published by The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, Incorporated. All rights reserved. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Non Commercial-No Derivatives License 4.0 (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) (CCBY-NC-ND), where it is permissible to download and share the work provided it is properly cited. The work cannot be changed in any way or used commercially without permission from the journal.
spellingShingle Scientific Articles
Tsikandylakis, Georgios
Mortensen, Kristian R.L.
Gromov, Kirill
Troelsen, Anders
Malchau, Henrik
Mohaddes, Maziar
The Use of Porous Titanium Coating and the Largest Possible Head Do Not Affect Early Cup Fixation: A 2-Year Report from a Randomized Controlled Trial
title The Use of Porous Titanium Coating and the Largest Possible Head Do Not Affect Early Cup Fixation: A 2-Year Report from a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full The Use of Porous Titanium Coating and the Largest Possible Head Do Not Affect Early Cup Fixation: A 2-Year Report from a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr The Use of Porous Titanium Coating and the Largest Possible Head Do Not Affect Early Cup Fixation: A 2-Year Report from a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed The Use of Porous Titanium Coating and the Largest Possible Head Do Not Affect Early Cup Fixation: A 2-Year Report from a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short The Use of Porous Titanium Coating and the Largest Possible Head Do Not Affect Early Cup Fixation: A 2-Year Report from a Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort use of porous titanium coating and the largest possible head do not affect early cup fixation: a 2-year report from a randomized controlled trial
topic Scientific Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7757840/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33376932
http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.OA.20.00107
work_keys_str_mv AT tsikandylakisgeorgios theuseofporoustitaniumcoatingandthelargestpossibleheaddonotaffectearlycupfixationa2yearreportfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mortensenkristianrl theuseofporoustitaniumcoatingandthelargestpossibleheaddonotaffectearlycupfixationa2yearreportfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gromovkirill theuseofporoustitaniumcoatingandthelargestpossibleheaddonotaffectearlycupfixationa2yearreportfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT troelsenanders theuseofporoustitaniumcoatingandthelargestpossibleheaddonotaffectearlycupfixationa2yearreportfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT malchauhenrik theuseofporoustitaniumcoatingandthelargestpossibleheaddonotaffectearlycupfixationa2yearreportfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mohaddesmaziar theuseofporoustitaniumcoatingandthelargestpossibleheaddonotaffectearlycupfixationa2yearreportfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT tsikandylakisgeorgios useofporoustitaniumcoatingandthelargestpossibleheaddonotaffectearlycupfixationa2yearreportfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mortensenkristianrl useofporoustitaniumcoatingandthelargestpossibleheaddonotaffectearlycupfixationa2yearreportfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT gromovkirill useofporoustitaniumcoatingandthelargestpossibleheaddonotaffectearlycupfixationa2yearreportfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT troelsenanders useofporoustitaniumcoatingandthelargestpossibleheaddonotaffectearlycupfixationa2yearreportfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT malchauhenrik useofporoustitaniumcoatingandthelargestpossibleheaddonotaffectearlycupfixationa2yearreportfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mohaddesmaziar useofporoustitaniumcoatingandthelargestpossibleheaddonotaffectearlycupfixationa2yearreportfromarandomizedcontrolledtrial