Cargando…
Evaluation of Swab and Rinse Sampling Procedures and Recovery Rate Determination in Cleaning Validation Considering Various Surfaces, Amount and Nature of the Residues and Contaminants
A cleaning validation for a family of compounds utilizing swab sampling and rinse solution procedures, and high performance liquid chromatography for separation and detection of the analytes was performed.Effective parameters on recovery including sampling method, swab characteristics, solvent, swab...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7758009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33680038 http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2020.1101173 |
_version_ | 1783626847895945216 |
---|---|
author | Lamei Ramandi, Somayeh Asgharian, Ramin |
author_facet | Lamei Ramandi, Somayeh Asgharian, Ramin |
author_sort | Lamei Ramandi, Somayeh |
collection | PubMed |
description | A cleaning validation for a family of compounds utilizing swab sampling and rinse solution procedures, and high performance liquid chromatography for separation and detection of the analytes was performed.Effective parameters on recovery including sampling method, swab characteristics, solvent, swabbing technique, and material substance of product contact surfaces within the manufacturing equipment for swab and rinse sampling method, quantitative cleaning verification method, and active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) level and nature have been studied.The limit of detection and the limit of quantitation for the HPLC method were determined to be 0.0198 µg/mL, and 0.0495 µg/mL of the analyte, respectively. The linearity on replicate injections of the standard prepared in the range of 0.78, 1.55, 3.1, and 6.2 µg/mL, and relative standard deviation (R.S.D.) found to be 1.2, 1.0, 0.9, and 0.6, respectively with correlation coefficient of R(2) = 0.9999. Recovery coverage for each type of surface was acceptable, ranging from 63.88% for swab sampling of stainless steel to 97.85% for rinse sampling of PVC. The acceptance criteria for precision on replicate injections of the analyte prepared in three concentration levels covering the specified range of 50, 100, and 200% was successfully accomplished R.S.D. lower than 15% for recovery results.Thus, choosing the appropriate sampling method, swab type, and surface condition can affect and increase recovery rate determination efficiency. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7758009 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77580092021-03-05 Evaluation of Swab and Rinse Sampling Procedures and Recovery Rate Determination in Cleaning Validation Considering Various Surfaces, Amount and Nature of the Residues and Contaminants Lamei Ramandi, Somayeh Asgharian, Ramin Iran J Pharm Res Original Article A cleaning validation for a family of compounds utilizing swab sampling and rinse solution procedures, and high performance liquid chromatography for separation and detection of the analytes was performed.Effective parameters on recovery including sampling method, swab characteristics, solvent, swabbing technique, and material substance of product contact surfaces within the manufacturing equipment for swab and rinse sampling method, quantitative cleaning verification method, and active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) level and nature have been studied.The limit of detection and the limit of quantitation for the HPLC method were determined to be 0.0198 µg/mL, and 0.0495 µg/mL of the analyte, respectively. The linearity on replicate injections of the standard prepared in the range of 0.78, 1.55, 3.1, and 6.2 µg/mL, and relative standard deviation (R.S.D.) found to be 1.2, 1.0, 0.9, and 0.6, respectively with correlation coefficient of R(2) = 0.9999. Recovery coverage for each type of surface was acceptable, ranging from 63.88% for swab sampling of stainless steel to 97.85% for rinse sampling of PVC. The acceptance criteria for precision on replicate injections of the analyte prepared in three concentration levels covering the specified range of 50, 100, and 200% was successfully accomplished R.S.D. lower than 15% for recovery results.Thus, choosing the appropriate sampling method, swab type, and surface condition can affect and increase recovery rate determination efficiency. Shaheed Beheshti University of Medical Sciences 2020 /pmc/articles/PMC7758009/ /pubmed/33680038 http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2020.1101173 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Lamei Ramandi, Somayeh Asgharian, Ramin Evaluation of Swab and Rinse Sampling Procedures and Recovery Rate Determination in Cleaning Validation Considering Various Surfaces, Amount and Nature of the Residues and Contaminants |
title | Evaluation of Swab and Rinse Sampling Procedures and Recovery Rate Determination in Cleaning Validation Considering Various Surfaces, Amount and Nature of the Residues and Contaminants |
title_full | Evaluation of Swab and Rinse Sampling Procedures and Recovery Rate Determination in Cleaning Validation Considering Various Surfaces, Amount and Nature of the Residues and Contaminants |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Swab and Rinse Sampling Procedures and Recovery Rate Determination in Cleaning Validation Considering Various Surfaces, Amount and Nature of the Residues and Contaminants |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Swab and Rinse Sampling Procedures and Recovery Rate Determination in Cleaning Validation Considering Various Surfaces, Amount and Nature of the Residues and Contaminants |
title_short | Evaluation of Swab and Rinse Sampling Procedures and Recovery Rate Determination in Cleaning Validation Considering Various Surfaces, Amount and Nature of the Residues and Contaminants |
title_sort | evaluation of swab and rinse sampling procedures and recovery rate determination in cleaning validation considering various surfaces, amount and nature of the residues and contaminants |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7758009/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33680038 http://dx.doi.org/10.22037/ijpr.2020.1101173 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lameiramandisomayeh evaluationofswabandrinsesamplingproceduresandrecoveryratedeterminationincleaningvalidationconsideringvarioussurfacesamountandnatureoftheresiduesandcontaminants AT asgharianramin evaluationofswabandrinsesamplingproceduresandrecoveryratedeterminationincleaningvalidationconsideringvarioussurfacesamountandnatureoftheresiduesandcontaminants |