Cargando…

Clinical Decision Support System with Renal Dose Adjustment Did Not Improve Subsequent Renal and Hepatic Function among Inpatients: The Japan Adverse Drug Event Study

Background  Medication dose adjustment is crucial for patients with renal dysfunction (RD). The assessment of renal function is generally mandatory; however, the renal function may change during the hospital stay and the manual assessment is sometimes challenging. Objective  We developed the clinica...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wada, Ryuhei, Takeuchi, Jiro, Nakamura, Tsukasa, Sonoyama, Tomohiro, Kosaka, Shinji, Matsumoto, Chisa, Sakuma, Mio, Ohta, Yoshinori, Morimoto, Takeshi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7758157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33368060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721056
_version_ 1783626879314427904
author Wada, Ryuhei
Takeuchi, Jiro
Nakamura, Tsukasa
Sonoyama, Tomohiro
Kosaka, Shinji
Matsumoto, Chisa
Sakuma, Mio
Ohta, Yoshinori
Morimoto, Takeshi
author_facet Wada, Ryuhei
Takeuchi, Jiro
Nakamura, Tsukasa
Sonoyama, Tomohiro
Kosaka, Shinji
Matsumoto, Chisa
Sakuma, Mio
Ohta, Yoshinori
Morimoto, Takeshi
author_sort Wada, Ryuhei
collection PubMed
description Background  Medication dose adjustment is crucial for patients with renal dysfunction (RD). The assessment of renal function is generally mandatory; however, the renal function may change during the hospital stay and the manual assessment is sometimes challenging. Objective  We developed the clinical decision support system (CDSS) that provided a recommended dose based on automated calculated renal function. Methods  We conducted a prospective cohort study in a single teaching hospital in Japan. All hospitalized patients were included except for obstetrics/gynecology and pediatric wards between September 2013 and February 2015. The CDSS was implemented on December 2013. Renal and hepatic dysfunction (HD) were defined as changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and alanine aminotransferase or alkaline phosphatase levels based on these measurements during hospital stay. These measurements were obtained before (phase I), after (phase II), and 1 year after (phase III) the CDSS implementation. Results  We included 6,767 patients (phase I: 2,205; phase II: 2,279; phase III: 2,283). The patients' characteristics were similar among phases. Changes in eGFR were similar among phases, but the incidence of RD increased in phase III (phase I: 228 [10.3%]; phase II: 260 [11.4%]; phase III: 296 [13.0%], p  = 0.02). However, the differences in incidences of RD were not statistically significant after adjusting for eGFR at baseline and age. The incidences of HD were also similar among phases (phase I: 175 [13.2%]; phase II: 171 [12.9%]; phase III: 167 [12.2%], p  = 0.72). Conclusion  The CDSS implementation did not affect the incidence of renal and HD and changes in renal and hepatic function among hospitalized patients. The effectiveness of the CDSS with renal-guided doses should be investigated with respect to other endpoints.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7758157
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77581572021-08-17 Clinical Decision Support System with Renal Dose Adjustment Did Not Improve Subsequent Renal and Hepatic Function among Inpatients: The Japan Adverse Drug Event Study Wada, Ryuhei Takeuchi, Jiro Nakamura, Tsukasa Sonoyama, Tomohiro Kosaka, Shinji Matsumoto, Chisa Sakuma, Mio Ohta, Yoshinori Morimoto, Takeshi Appl Clin Inform Background  Medication dose adjustment is crucial for patients with renal dysfunction (RD). The assessment of renal function is generally mandatory; however, the renal function may change during the hospital stay and the manual assessment is sometimes challenging. Objective  We developed the clinical decision support system (CDSS) that provided a recommended dose based on automated calculated renal function. Methods  We conducted a prospective cohort study in a single teaching hospital in Japan. All hospitalized patients were included except for obstetrics/gynecology and pediatric wards between September 2013 and February 2015. The CDSS was implemented on December 2013. Renal and hepatic dysfunction (HD) were defined as changes in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) and alanine aminotransferase or alkaline phosphatase levels based on these measurements during hospital stay. These measurements were obtained before (phase I), after (phase II), and 1 year after (phase III) the CDSS implementation. Results  We included 6,767 patients (phase I: 2,205; phase II: 2,279; phase III: 2,283). The patients' characteristics were similar among phases. Changes in eGFR were similar among phases, but the incidence of RD increased in phase III (phase I: 228 [10.3%]; phase II: 260 [11.4%]; phase III: 296 [13.0%], p  = 0.02). However, the differences in incidences of RD were not statistically significant after adjusting for eGFR at baseline and age. The incidences of HD were also similar among phases (phase I: 175 [13.2%]; phase II: 171 [12.9%]; phase III: 167 [12.2%], p  = 0.72). Conclusion  The CDSS implementation did not affect the incidence of renal and HD and changes in renal and hepatic function among hospitalized patients. The effectiveness of the CDSS with renal-guided doses should be investigated with respect to other endpoints. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2020-10 2020-12-23 /pmc/articles/PMC7758157/ /pubmed/33368060 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721056 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ ) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Wada, Ryuhei
Takeuchi, Jiro
Nakamura, Tsukasa
Sonoyama, Tomohiro
Kosaka, Shinji
Matsumoto, Chisa
Sakuma, Mio
Ohta, Yoshinori
Morimoto, Takeshi
Clinical Decision Support System with Renal Dose Adjustment Did Not Improve Subsequent Renal and Hepatic Function among Inpatients: The Japan Adverse Drug Event Study
title Clinical Decision Support System with Renal Dose Adjustment Did Not Improve Subsequent Renal and Hepatic Function among Inpatients: The Japan Adverse Drug Event Study
title_full Clinical Decision Support System with Renal Dose Adjustment Did Not Improve Subsequent Renal and Hepatic Function among Inpatients: The Japan Adverse Drug Event Study
title_fullStr Clinical Decision Support System with Renal Dose Adjustment Did Not Improve Subsequent Renal and Hepatic Function among Inpatients: The Japan Adverse Drug Event Study
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Decision Support System with Renal Dose Adjustment Did Not Improve Subsequent Renal and Hepatic Function among Inpatients: The Japan Adverse Drug Event Study
title_short Clinical Decision Support System with Renal Dose Adjustment Did Not Improve Subsequent Renal and Hepatic Function among Inpatients: The Japan Adverse Drug Event Study
title_sort clinical decision support system with renal dose adjustment did not improve subsequent renal and hepatic function among inpatients: the japan adverse drug event study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7758157/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33368060
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721056
work_keys_str_mv AT wadaryuhei clinicaldecisionsupportsystemwithrenaldoseadjustmentdidnotimprovesubsequentrenalandhepaticfunctionamonginpatientsthejapanadversedrugeventstudy
AT takeuchijiro clinicaldecisionsupportsystemwithrenaldoseadjustmentdidnotimprovesubsequentrenalandhepaticfunctionamonginpatientsthejapanadversedrugeventstudy
AT nakamuratsukasa clinicaldecisionsupportsystemwithrenaldoseadjustmentdidnotimprovesubsequentrenalandhepaticfunctionamonginpatientsthejapanadversedrugeventstudy
AT sonoyamatomohiro clinicaldecisionsupportsystemwithrenaldoseadjustmentdidnotimprovesubsequentrenalandhepaticfunctionamonginpatientsthejapanadversedrugeventstudy
AT kosakashinji clinicaldecisionsupportsystemwithrenaldoseadjustmentdidnotimprovesubsequentrenalandhepaticfunctionamonginpatientsthejapanadversedrugeventstudy
AT matsumotochisa clinicaldecisionsupportsystemwithrenaldoseadjustmentdidnotimprovesubsequentrenalandhepaticfunctionamonginpatientsthejapanadversedrugeventstudy
AT sakumamio clinicaldecisionsupportsystemwithrenaldoseadjustmentdidnotimprovesubsequentrenalandhepaticfunctionamonginpatientsthejapanadversedrugeventstudy
AT ohtayoshinori clinicaldecisionsupportsystemwithrenaldoseadjustmentdidnotimprovesubsequentrenalandhepaticfunctionamonginpatientsthejapanadversedrugeventstudy
AT morimototakeshi clinicaldecisionsupportsystemwithrenaldoseadjustmentdidnotimprovesubsequentrenalandhepaticfunctionamonginpatientsthejapanadversedrugeventstudy