Cargando…

Characteristics of radiographic images acquired with CdTe, CCD and CMOS detectors in skull radiography

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the image quality, diagnostic efficacy, and radiation dose associated with the use of a cadmium telluride (CdTe) detector, compared to charge-coupled device (CCD) and complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) detectors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: L...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Queiroz, Polyane Mazucatto, Santaella, Gustavo Machado, de Castro Lopes, Sergio Lucio Pereira, Haiter-Neto, Francisco, Freitas, Deborah Queiroz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7758267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33409143
http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2020.50.4.339
_version_ 1783626903984275456
author Queiroz, Polyane Mazucatto
Santaella, Gustavo Machado
de Castro Lopes, Sergio Lucio Pereira
Haiter-Neto, Francisco
Freitas, Deborah Queiroz
author_facet Queiroz, Polyane Mazucatto
Santaella, Gustavo Machado
de Castro Lopes, Sergio Lucio Pereira
Haiter-Neto, Francisco
Freitas, Deborah Queiroz
author_sort Queiroz, Polyane Mazucatto
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the image quality, diagnostic efficacy, and radiation dose associated with the use of a cadmium telluride (CdTe) detector, compared to charge-coupled device (CCD) and complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) detectors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lateral cephalographs of a phantom (type 1) composed of synthetic polymer filled with water and another phantom (type 2) composed of human skull macerated with polymer coating were obtained with CdTe, CCD, and CMOS detectors. Dosimeters placed on the type 2 phantom were used to measure radiation. Noise levels from each image were also measured. McNamara cephalometric analysis was conducted, the dentoskeletal configurations were assessed, and a subjective evaluation of image quality was conducted. Parametric data were compared via 1-way analysis of variance with the Tukey post-hoc test, with a significance level of 5%. Subjective image quality and dentoskeletal configuration were described qualitatively. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was found among the images obtained with the 3 detectors (P<0.05), with the lowest noise level observed among the images obtained with the CdTe detector and a higher subjective preference demonstrated for those images. For the cephalometric analyses, no significant difference (P>0.05) was observed, and perfect agreement was seen with regard to the classifications obtained from the images acquired using the 3 detectors. The radiation dose associated with the CMOS detector was higher than the doses associated with the CCD (P<0.05) and CdTe detectors (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Considering the evaluated parameters, the CdTe detector is recommended for use in clinical practice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7758267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77582672021-01-05 Characteristics of radiographic images acquired with CdTe, CCD and CMOS detectors in skull radiography Queiroz, Polyane Mazucatto Santaella, Gustavo Machado de Castro Lopes, Sergio Lucio Pereira Haiter-Neto, Francisco Freitas, Deborah Queiroz Imaging Sci Dent Original Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the image quality, diagnostic efficacy, and radiation dose associated with the use of a cadmium telluride (CdTe) detector, compared to charge-coupled device (CCD) and complementary metal oxide semiconductor (CMOS) detectors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lateral cephalographs of a phantom (type 1) composed of synthetic polymer filled with water and another phantom (type 2) composed of human skull macerated with polymer coating were obtained with CdTe, CCD, and CMOS detectors. Dosimeters placed on the type 2 phantom were used to measure radiation. Noise levels from each image were also measured. McNamara cephalometric analysis was conducted, the dentoskeletal configurations were assessed, and a subjective evaluation of image quality was conducted. Parametric data were compared via 1-way analysis of variance with the Tukey post-hoc test, with a significance level of 5%. Subjective image quality and dentoskeletal configuration were described qualitatively. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference was found among the images obtained with the 3 detectors (P<0.05), with the lowest noise level observed among the images obtained with the CdTe detector and a higher subjective preference demonstrated for those images. For the cephalometric analyses, no significant difference (P>0.05) was observed, and perfect agreement was seen with regard to the classifications obtained from the images acquired using the 3 detectors. The radiation dose associated with the CMOS detector was higher than the doses associated with the CCD (P<0.05) and CdTe detectors (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: Considering the evaluated parameters, the CdTe detector is recommended for use in clinical practice. Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology 2020-12 2020-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7758267/ /pubmed/33409143 http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2020.50.4.339 Text en Copyright © 2020 by Korean Academy of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Queiroz, Polyane Mazucatto
Santaella, Gustavo Machado
de Castro Lopes, Sergio Lucio Pereira
Haiter-Neto, Francisco
Freitas, Deborah Queiroz
Characteristics of radiographic images acquired with CdTe, CCD and CMOS detectors in skull radiography
title Characteristics of radiographic images acquired with CdTe, CCD and CMOS detectors in skull radiography
title_full Characteristics of radiographic images acquired with CdTe, CCD and CMOS detectors in skull radiography
title_fullStr Characteristics of radiographic images acquired with CdTe, CCD and CMOS detectors in skull radiography
title_full_unstemmed Characteristics of radiographic images acquired with CdTe, CCD and CMOS detectors in skull radiography
title_short Characteristics of radiographic images acquired with CdTe, CCD and CMOS detectors in skull radiography
title_sort characteristics of radiographic images acquired with cdte, ccd and cmos detectors in skull radiography
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7758267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33409143
http://dx.doi.org/10.5624/isd.2020.50.4.339
work_keys_str_mv AT queirozpolyanemazucatto characteristicsofradiographicimagesacquiredwithcdteccdandcmosdetectorsinskullradiography
AT santaellagustavomachado characteristicsofradiographicimagesacquiredwithcdteccdandcmosdetectorsinskullradiography
AT decastrolopessergioluciopereira characteristicsofradiographicimagesacquiredwithcdteccdandcmosdetectorsinskullradiography
AT haiternetofrancisco characteristicsofradiographicimagesacquiredwithcdteccdandcmosdetectorsinskullradiography
AT freitasdeborahqueiroz characteristicsofradiographicimagesacquiredwithcdteccdandcmosdetectorsinskullradiography