Cargando…

Categorisation of EEG suppression using enhanced feature extraction for SUDEP risk assessment

BACKGROUND: Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) has increased in awareness considerably over the last two decades and is acknowledged as a serious problem in epilepsy. However, the scientific community remains unclear on the reason or possible bio markers that can discern potentially fatal s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mier, Juan C., Kim, Yejin, Jiang, Xiaoqian, Zhang, Guo-Qiang, Lhatoo, Samden
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7758934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33357224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01309-5
_version_ 1783627028236337152
author Mier, Juan C.
Kim, Yejin
Jiang, Xiaoqian
Zhang, Guo-Qiang
Lhatoo, Samden
author_facet Mier, Juan C.
Kim, Yejin
Jiang, Xiaoqian
Zhang, Guo-Qiang
Lhatoo, Samden
author_sort Mier, Juan C.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) has increased in awareness considerably over the last two decades and is acknowledged as a serious problem in epilepsy. However, the scientific community remains unclear on the reason or possible bio markers that can discern potentially fatal seizures from other non-fatal seizures. The duration of postictal generalized EEG suppression (PGES) is a promising candidate to aid in identifying SUDEP risk. The length of time a patient experiences PGES after a seizure may be used to infer the risk a patient may have of SUDEP later in life. However, the problem becomes identifying the duration, or marking the end, of PGES (Tomson et al. in Lancet Neurol 7(11):1021–1031, 2008; Nashef in Epilepsia 38:6–8, 1997). METHODS: This work addresses the problem of marking the end to PGES in EEG data, extracted from patients during a clinically supervised seizure. This work proposes a sensitivity analysis on EEG window size/delay, feature extraction and classifiers along with associated hyperparameters. The resulting sensitivity analysis includes the Gradient Boosted Decision Trees and Random Forest classifiers trained on 10 extracted features rooted in fundamental EEG behavior using an EEG specific feature extraction process (pyEEG) and 5 different window sizes or delays (Bao et al. in Comput Intell Neurosci 2011:1687–5265, 2011). RESULTS: The machine learning architecture described above scored a maximum AUC score of 76.02% with the Random Forest classifier trained on all extracted features. The highest performing features included SVD Entropy, Petrosan Fractal Dimension and Power Spectral Intensity. CONCLUSION: The methods described are effective in automatically marking the end to PGES. Future work should include integration of these methods into the clinical setting and using the results to be able to predict a patient’s SUDEP risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7758934
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77589342020-12-28 Categorisation of EEG suppression using enhanced feature extraction for SUDEP risk assessment Mier, Juan C. Kim, Yejin Jiang, Xiaoqian Zhang, Guo-Qiang Lhatoo, Samden BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research BACKGROUND: Sudden Unexpected Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) has increased in awareness considerably over the last two decades and is acknowledged as a serious problem in epilepsy. However, the scientific community remains unclear on the reason or possible bio markers that can discern potentially fatal seizures from other non-fatal seizures. The duration of postictal generalized EEG suppression (PGES) is a promising candidate to aid in identifying SUDEP risk. The length of time a patient experiences PGES after a seizure may be used to infer the risk a patient may have of SUDEP later in life. However, the problem becomes identifying the duration, or marking the end, of PGES (Tomson et al. in Lancet Neurol 7(11):1021–1031, 2008; Nashef in Epilepsia 38:6–8, 1997). METHODS: This work addresses the problem of marking the end to PGES in EEG data, extracted from patients during a clinically supervised seizure. This work proposes a sensitivity analysis on EEG window size/delay, feature extraction and classifiers along with associated hyperparameters. The resulting sensitivity analysis includes the Gradient Boosted Decision Trees and Random Forest classifiers trained on 10 extracted features rooted in fundamental EEG behavior using an EEG specific feature extraction process (pyEEG) and 5 different window sizes or delays (Bao et al. in Comput Intell Neurosci 2011:1687–5265, 2011). RESULTS: The machine learning architecture described above scored a maximum AUC score of 76.02% with the Random Forest classifier trained on all extracted features. The highest performing features included SVD Entropy, Petrosan Fractal Dimension and Power Spectral Intensity. CONCLUSION: The methods described are effective in automatically marking the end to PGES. Future work should include integration of these methods into the clinical setting and using the results to be able to predict a patient’s SUDEP risk. BioMed Central 2020-12-24 /pmc/articles/PMC7758934/ /pubmed/33357224 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01309-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.
spellingShingle Research
Mier, Juan C.
Kim, Yejin
Jiang, Xiaoqian
Zhang, Guo-Qiang
Lhatoo, Samden
Categorisation of EEG suppression using enhanced feature extraction for SUDEP risk assessment
title Categorisation of EEG suppression using enhanced feature extraction for SUDEP risk assessment
title_full Categorisation of EEG suppression using enhanced feature extraction for SUDEP risk assessment
title_fullStr Categorisation of EEG suppression using enhanced feature extraction for SUDEP risk assessment
title_full_unstemmed Categorisation of EEG suppression using enhanced feature extraction for SUDEP risk assessment
title_short Categorisation of EEG suppression using enhanced feature extraction for SUDEP risk assessment
title_sort categorisation of eeg suppression using enhanced feature extraction for sudep risk assessment
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7758934/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33357224
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12911-020-01309-5
work_keys_str_mv AT mierjuanc categorisationofeegsuppressionusingenhancedfeatureextractionforsudepriskassessment
AT kimyejin categorisationofeegsuppressionusingenhancedfeatureextractionforsudepriskassessment
AT jiangxiaoqian categorisationofeegsuppressionusingenhancedfeatureextractionforsudepriskassessment
AT zhangguoqiang categorisationofeegsuppressionusingenhancedfeatureextractionforsudepriskassessment
AT lhatoosamden categorisationofeegsuppressionusingenhancedfeatureextractionforsudepriskassessment