Cargando…
Impact of critical care response team implementation on oncology patient outcomes: A retrospective cohort study
INTRODUCTION: The main goal of a critical care response team (CCRT) is to quickly assess and transfer, if required, rapidly deteriorating patients to an intensive care unit (ICU) to prevent cardiopulmonary arrest, stabilize patients' condition, and help in optimizing the care provided by the pr...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7759073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33376688 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_13_19 |
_version_ | 1783627058767724544 |
---|---|
author | Al Qahtani, Saad Alaklabi, Ali El-Saed, Aiman |
author_facet | Al Qahtani, Saad Alaklabi, Ali El-Saed, Aiman |
author_sort | Al Qahtani, Saad |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The main goal of a critical care response team (CCRT) is to quickly assess and transfer, if required, rapidly deteriorating patients to an intensive care unit (ICU) to prevent cardiopulmonary arrest, stabilize patients' condition, and help in optimizing the care provided by the primary team. The objective of this study was to investigate the correlation between early intervention by CCRT and the outcome of oncology patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. KAMC is a tertiary care facility with 1200-bed capacity. The study compared oncology patients to nononcology patients. RESULTS: Over 4 years, a total number of 4941 patients were reviewed, of which 172 were oncology patients. The average age of patients in the oncology group was 48.8 ± 20.7, while the average age for nononcology was 52.8 ± 21.2 (P = 0.016). The average Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score on admission for oncology patients was higher than that for the nononcology group (27.8 ± 8.9 vs. 23.6 ± 9.3, respectively). Lower ICU mortality was seen after CCRT implementation (38.8% vs. 62.7%). The average duration of hospital stay and ICU stay increased after CCRT implementation (37.34 vs. 29.31 and 11.93 vs. 8.9, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this study, we identified that early intervention by implementing CCRT had a significant impact in reducing ICU mortality for oncology and nononcology patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7759073 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77590732020-12-28 Impact of critical care response team implementation on oncology patient outcomes: A retrospective cohort study Al Qahtani, Saad Alaklabi, Ali El-Saed, Aiman Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci Original Article INTRODUCTION: The main goal of a critical care response team (CCRT) is to quickly assess and transfer, if required, rapidly deteriorating patients to an intensive care unit (ICU) to prevent cardiopulmonary arrest, stabilize patients' condition, and help in optimizing the care provided by the primary team. The objective of this study was to investigate the correlation between early intervention by CCRT and the outcome of oncology patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. KAMC is a tertiary care facility with 1200-bed capacity. The study compared oncology patients to nononcology patients. RESULTS: Over 4 years, a total number of 4941 patients were reviewed, of which 172 were oncology patients. The average age of patients in the oncology group was 48.8 ± 20.7, while the average age for nononcology was 52.8 ± 21.2 (P = 0.016). The average Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score on admission for oncology patients was higher than that for the nononcology group (27.8 ± 8.9 vs. 23.6 ± 9.3, respectively). Lower ICU mortality was seen after CCRT implementation (38.8% vs. 62.7%). The average duration of hospital stay and ICU stay increased after CCRT implementation (37.34 vs. 29.31 and 11.93 vs. 8.9, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this study, we identified that early intervention by implementing CCRT had a significant impact in reducing ICU mortality for oncology and nononcology patients. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-09 2020-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7759073/ /pubmed/33376688 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_13_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Al Qahtani, Saad Alaklabi, Ali El-Saed, Aiman Impact of critical care response team implementation on oncology patient outcomes: A retrospective cohort study |
title | Impact of critical care response team implementation on oncology patient outcomes: A retrospective cohort study |
title_full | Impact of critical care response team implementation on oncology patient outcomes: A retrospective cohort study |
title_fullStr | Impact of critical care response team implementation on oncology patient outcomes: A retrospective cohort study |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of critical care response team implementation on oncology patient outcomes: A retrospective cohort study |
title_short | Impact of critical care response team implementation on oncology patient outcomes: A retrospective cohort study |
title_sort | impact of critical care response team implementation on oncology patient outcomes: a retrospective cohort study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7759073/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33376688 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_13_19 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT alqahtanisaad impactofcriticalcareresponseteamimplementationononcologypatientoutcomesaretrospectivecohortstudy AT alaklabiali impactofcriticalcareresponseteamimplementationononcologypatientoutcomesaretrospectivecohortstudy AT elsaedaiman impactofcriticalcareresponseteamimplementationononcologypatientoutcomesaretrospectivecohortstudy |