Cargando…

Impact of critical care response team implementation on oncology patient outcomes: A retrospective cohort study

INTRODUCTION: The main goal of a critical care response team (CCRT) is to quickly assess and transfer, if required, rapidly deteriorating patients to an intensive care unit (ICU) to prevent cardiopulmonary arrest, stabilize patients' condition, and help in optimizing the care provided by the pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Al Qahtani, Saad, Alaklabi, Ali, El-Saed, Aiman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7759073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33376688
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_13_19
_version_ 1783627058767724544
author Al Qahtani, Saad
Alaklabi, Ali
El-Saed, Aiman
author_facet Al Qahtani, Saad
Alaklabi, Ali
El-Saed, Aiman
author_sort Al Qahtani, Saad
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The main goal of a critical care response team (CCRT) is to quickly assess and transfer, if required, rapidly deteriorating patients to an intensive care unit (ICU) to prevent cardiopulmonary arrest, stabilize patients' condition, and help in optimizing the care provided by the primary team. The objective of this study was to investigate the correlation between early intervention by CCRT and the outcome of oncology patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. KAMC is a tertiary care facility with 1200-bed capacity. The study compared oncology patients to nononcology patients. RESULTS: Over 4 years, a total number of 4941 patients were reviewed, of which 172 were oncology patients. The average age of patients in the oncology group was 48.8 ± 20.7, while the average age for nononcology was 52.8 ± 21.2 (P = 0.016). The average Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score on admission for oncology patients was higher than that for the nononcology group (27.8 ± 8.9 vs. 23.6 ± 9.3, respectively). Lower ICU mortality was seen after CCRT implementation (38.8% vs. 62.7%). The average duration of hospital stay and ICU stay increased after CCRT implementation (37.34 vs. 29.31 and 11.93 vs. 8.9, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this study, we identified that early intervention by implementing CCRT had a significant impact in reducing ICU mortality for oncology and nononcology patients.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7759073
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77590732020-12-28 Impact of critical care response team implementation on oncology patient outcomes: A retrospective cohort study Al Qahtani, Saad Alaklabi, Ali El-Saed, Aiman Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci Original Article INTRODUCTION: The main goal of a critical care response team (CCRT) is to quickly assess and transfer, if required, rapidly deteriorating patients to an intensive care unit (ICU) to prevent cardiopulmonary arrest, stabilize patients' condition, and help in optimizing the care provided by the primary team. The objective of this study was to investigate the correlation between early intervention by CCRT and the outcome of oncology patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at King Abdulaziz Medical City (KAMC), Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. KAMC is a tertiary care facility with 1200-bed capacity. The study compared oncology patients to nononcology patients. RESULTS: Over 4 years, a total number of 4941 patients were reviewed, of which 172 were oncology patients. The average age of patients in the oncology group was 48.8 ± 20.7, while the average age for nononcology was 52.8 ± 21.2 (P = 0.016). The average Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score on admission for oncology patients was higher than that for the nononcology group (27.8 ± 8.9 vs. 23.6 ± 9.3, respectively). Lower ICU mortality was seen after CCRT implementation (38.8% vs. 62.7%). The average duration of hospital stay and ICU stay increased after CCRT implementation (37.34 vs. 29.31 and 11.93 vs. 8.9, respectively). CONCLUSION: In this study, we identified that early intervention by implementing CCRT had a significant impact in reducing ICU mortality for oncology and nononcology patients. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-09 2020-09-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7759073/ /pubmed/33376688 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_13_19 Text en Copyright: © 2020 International Journal of Critical Illness and Injury Science http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Al Qahtani, Saad
Alaklabi, Ali
El-Saed, Aiman
Impact of critical care response team implementation on oncology patient outcomes: A retrospective cohort study
title Impact of critical care response team implementation on oncology patient outcomes: A retrospective cohort study
title_full Impact of critical care response team implementation on oncology patient outcomes: A retrospective cohort study
title_fullStr Impact of critical care response team implementation on oncology patient outcomes: A retrospective cohort study
title_full_unstemmed Impact of critical care response team implementation on oncology patient outcomes: A retrospective cohort study
title_short Impact of critical care response team implementation on oncology patient outcomes: A retrospective cohort study
title_sort impact of critical care response team implementation on oncology patient outcomes: a retrospective cohort study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7759073/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33376688
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/IJCIIS.IJCIIS_13_19
work_keys_str_mv AT alqahtanisaad impactofcriticalcareresponseteamimplementationononcologypatientoutcomesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT alaklabiali impactofcriticalcareresponseteamimplementationononcologypatientoutcomesaretrospectivecohortstudy
AT elsaedaiman impactofcriticalcareresponseteamimplementationononcologypatientoutcomesaretrospectivecohortstudy