Cargando…
Examination of the Coping Flexibility Hypothesis Using the Coping Flexibility Scale-Revised
Coping flexibility, as defined by the dual-process theory, refers to one’s ability to relinquish a coping strategy recognized as ineffective—abandonment—and to devise and implement an alternative and more effective strategy—re-coping. The coping flexibility hypothesis (CFH) dictates that richer copi...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7759683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33362627 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561731 |
_version_ | 1783627158758883328 |
---|---|
author | Kato, Tsukasa |
author_facet | Kato, Tsukasa |
author_sort | Kato, Tsukasa |
collection | PubMed |
description | Coping flexibility, as defined by the dual-process theory, refers to one’s ability to relinquish a coping strategy recognized as ineffective—abandonment—and to devise and implement an alternative and more effective strategy—re-coping. The coping flexibility hypothesis (CFH) dictates that richer coping flexibility produces more adaptive outcomes caused by stress responses, such as reduced psychological and physical dysfunction. We tested the reliability and validity of the Coping Flexibility Scale-Revised (CFS-R) and the CFH using the CFS-R, which was developed to measure coping flexibility. In total, we performed three studies involving 6,752 participants. Study 1 provided the psychometric properties of the CFS-R and tested this factorial structure by a confirmatory factor analysis. Study 2 estimated the validity of the CFS-R by examining the associations between its three subscales and variables that were conceptually similar to them. Study 3 tested the CFH using a longitudinal design after controlling for the effects of typical coping strategies and other types of coping flexibility. Overall, the CFH was supported by the use of the CFS-R, and the findings in Studies 2 and 3 showed that it had acceptable validity and reliability. Our findings implied that abandonment and re-coping can predict reduced depressive symptoms more than other types of theoretical framings for coping flexibility. Additionally, a meta-analysis of the Cronbach’s alphas for all samples in this study (k = 9, N = 6,752) showed that they were 0.87 (95% CI [0.87, 0.88]) for abandonment, 0.92 (95% CI [0.91, 0.92]) for re-coping, and 0.86 (95% CI [0.85, 0.87]) for meta-coping. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7759683 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77596832020-12-26 Examination of the Coping Flexibility Hypothesis Using the Coping Flexibility Scale-Revised Kato, Tsukasa Front Psychol Psychology Coping flexibility, as defined by the dual-process theory, refers to one’s ability to relinquish a coping strategy recognized as ineffective—abandonment—and to devise and implement an alternative and more effective strategy—re-coping. The coping flexibility hypothesis (CFH) dictates that richer coping flexibility produces more adaptive outcomes caused by stress responses, such as reduced psychological and physical dysfunction. We tested the reliability and validity of the Coping Flexibility Scale-Revised (CFS-R) and the CFH using the CFS-R, which was developed to measure coping flexibility. In total, we performed three studies involving 6,752 participants. Study 1 provided the psychometric properties of the CFS-R and tested this factorial structure by a confirmatory factor analysis. Study 2 estimated the validity of the CFS-R by examining the associations between its three subscales and variables that were conceptually similar to them. Study 3 tested the CFH using a longitudinal design after controlling for the effects of typical coping strategies and other types of coping flexibility. Overall, the CFH was supported by the use of the CFS-R, and the findings in Studies 2 and 3 showed that it had acceptable validity and reliability. Our findings implied that abandonment and re-coping can predict reduced depressive symptoms more than other types of theoretical framings for coping flexibility. Additionally, a meta-analysis of the Cronbach’s alphas for all samples in this study (k = 9, N = 6,752) showed that they were 0.87 (95% CI [0.87, 0.88]) for abandonment, 0.92 (95% CI [0.91, 0.92]) for re-coping, and 0.86 (95% CI [0.85, 0.87]) for meta-coping. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-11 /pmc/articles/PMC7759683/ /pubmed/33362627 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561731 Text en Copyright © 2020 Kato. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Kato, Tsukasa Examination of the Coping Flexibility Hypothesis Using the Coping Flexibility Scale-Revised |
title | Examination of the Coping Flexibility Hypothesis Using the Coping Flexibility Scale-Revised |
title_full | Examination of the Coping Flexibility Hypothesis Using the Coping Flexibility Scale-Revised |
title_fullStr | Examination of the Coping Flexibility Hypothesis Using the Coping Flexibility Scale-Revised |
title_full_unstemmed | Examination of the Coping Flexibility Hypothesis Using the Coping Flexibility Scale-Revised |
title_short | Examination of the Coping Flexibility Hypothesis Using the Coping Flexibility Scale-Revised |
title_sort | examination of the coping flexibility hypothesis using the coping flexibility scale-revised |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7759683/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33362627 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.561731 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT katotsukasa examinationofthecopingflexibilityhypothesisusingthecopingflexibilityscalerevised |