Cargando…

Prevalence of COVID-19 Diagnostic Output with Chest Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: The pooled prevalence of chest computed tomography (CT) abnormalities and other detailed analysis related to patients’ biodata like gender and different age groups have not been previously described for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), thus necessitating this study. Obj...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Komolafe, Temitope Emmanuel, Agbo, John, Olaniyi, Ebenezer Obaloluwa, Komolafe, Kayode, Yang, Xiaodong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7759864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33260639
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10121023
_version_ 1783627197491183616
author Komolafe, Temitope Emmanuel
Agbo, John
Olaniyi, Ebenezer Obaloluwa
Komolafe, Kayode
Yang, Xiaodong
author_facet Komolafe, Temitope Emmanuel
Agbo, John
Olaniyi, Ebenezer Obaloluwa
Komolafe, Kayode
Yang, Xiaodong
author_sort Komolafe, Temitope Emmanuel
collection PubMed
description Background: The pooled prevalence of chest computed tomography (CT) abnormalities and other detailed analysis related to patients’ biodata like gender and different age groups have not been previously described for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), thus necessitating this study. Objectives: To perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic performance of chest CT, common CT morphological abnormalities, disease prevalence, biodata information, and gender prevalence of patients. Methods: Studies were identified by searching PubMed and Science Direct libraries from 1 January 2020 to 30 April 2020. Pooled CT positive rate of COVID-19 and RT-PCR, CT-imaging features, history of exposure, and biodata information were estimated using the quality effect (QE) model. Results: Out of 36 studies included, the sensitivity was 89% (95% CI: 80–96%) and 98% (95% CI: 90–100%) for chest CT and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), respectively. The pooled prevalence across lesion distribution were 72% (95% CI: 62–80%), 92% (95% CI: 84–97%) for lung lobe, 88% (95% CI: 81–93%) for patients with history of exposure, and 91% (95% CI: 85–96%) for patients with all categories of symptoms. Seventy-six percent (95% CI: 67–83%) had age distribution across four age groups, while the pooled prevalence was higher in the male with 54% (95% CI: 50–57%) and 46% (95% CI: 43–50%) in the female. Conclusions: The sensitivity of RT-PCR was higher than chest CT, and disease prevalence appears relatively higher in the elderly and males than children and females, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7759864
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77598642020-12-26 Prevalence of COVID-19 Diagnostic Output with Chest Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Komolafe, Temitope Emmanuel Agbo, John Olaniyi, Ebenezer Obaloluwa Komolafe, Kayode Yang, Xiaodong Diagnostics (Basel) Review Background: The pooled prevalence of chest computed tomography (CT) abnormalities and other detailed analysis related to patients’ biodata like gender and different age groups have not been previously described for patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), thus necessitating this study. Objectives: To perform a meta-analysis to evaluate the diagnostic performance of chest CT, common CT morphological abnormalities, disease prevalence, biodata information, and gender prevalence of patients. Methods: Studies were identified by searching PubMed and Science Direct libraries from 1 January 2020 to 30 April 2020. Pooled CT positive rate of COVID-19 and RT-PCR, CT-imaging features, history of exposure, and biodata information were estimated using the quality effect (QE) model. Results: Out of 36 studies included, the sensitivity was 89% (95% CI: 80–96%) and 98% (95% CI: 90–100%) for chest CT and reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR), respectively. The pooled prevalence across lesion distribution were 72% (95% CI: 62–80%), 92% (95% CI: 84–97%) for lung lobe, 88% (95% CI: 81–93%) for patients with history of exposure, and 91% (95% CI: 85–96%) for patients with all categories of symptoms. Seventy-six percent (95% CI: 67–83%) had age distribution across four age groups, while the pooled prevalence was higher in the male with 54% (95% CI: 50–57%) and 46% (95% CI: 43–50%) in the female. Conclusions: The sensitivity of RT-PCR was higher than chest CT, and disease prevalence appears relatively higher in the elderly and males than children and females, respectively. MDPI 2020-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7759864/ /pubmed/33260639 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10121023 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Komolafe, Temitope Emmanuel
Agbo, John
Olaniyi, Ebenezer Obaloluwa
Komolafe, Kayode
Yang, Xiaodong
Prevalence of COVID-19 Diagnostic Output with Chest Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title Prevalence of COVID-19 Diagnostic Output with Chest Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full Prevalence of COVID-19 Diagnostic Output with Chest Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Prevalence of COVID-19 Diagnostic Output with Chest Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prevalence of COVID-19 Diagnostic Output with Chest Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_short Prevalence of COVID-19 Diagnostic Output with Chest Computed Tomography: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
title_sort prevalence of covid-19 diagnostic output with chest computed tomography: a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7759864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33260639
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10121023
work_keys_str_mv AT komolafetemitopeemmanuel prevalenceofcovid19diagnosticoutputwithchestcomputedtomographyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT agbojohn prevalenceofcovid19diagnosticoutputwithchestcomputedtomographyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT olaniyiebenezerobaloluwa prevalenceofcovid19diagnosticoutputwithchestcomputedtomographyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT komolafekayode prevalenceofcovid19diagnosticoutputwithchestcomputedtomographyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT yangxiaodong prevalenceofcovid19diagnosticoutputwithchestcomputedtomographyasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis