Cargando…

Incidence Lung Cancer after a Negative CT Screening in the National Lung Screening Trial: Deep Learning-Based Detection of Missed Lung Cancers

We aimed to analyse the CT examinations of the previous screening round (CT(prev)) in NLST participants with incidence lung cancer and evaluate the value of DL-CAD in detection of missed lung cancers. Thoracic radiologists reviewed CT(prev) in participants with incidence lung cancer, and a DL-CAD an...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cho, Jungheum, Kim, Jihang, Lee, Kyong Joon, Nam, Chang Mo, Yoon, Sung Hyun, Song, Hwayoung, Kim, Junghoon, Choi, Ye Ra, Lee, Kyung Hee, Lee, Kyung Won
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7759925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33276433
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9123908
_version_ 1783627211923783680
author Cho, Jungheum
Kim, Jihang
Lee, Kyong Joon
Nam, Chang Mo
Yoon, Sung Hyun
Song, Hwayoung
Kim, Junghoon
Choi, Ye Ra
Lee, Kyung Hee
Lee, Kyung Won
author_facet Cho, Jungheum
Kim, Jihang
Lee, Kyong Joon
Nam, Chang Mo
Yoon, Sung Hyun
Song, Hwayoung
Kim, Junghoon
Choi, Ye Ra
Lee, Kyung Hee
Lee, Kyung Won
author_sort Cho, Jungheum
collection PubMed
description We aimed to analyse the CT examinations of the previous screening round (CT(prev)) in NLST participants with incidence lung cancer and evaluate the value of DL-CAD in detection of missed lung cancers. Thoracic radiologists reviewed CT(prev) in participants with incidence lung cancer, and a DL-CAD analysed CT(prev) according to NLST criteria and the lung CT screening reporting & data system (Lung-RADS) classification. We calculated patient-wise and lesion-wise sensitivities of the DL-CAD in detection of missed lung cancers. As per the NLST criteria, 88% (100/113) of CT(prev) were positive and 74 of them had missed lung cancers. The DL-CAD reported 98% (98/100) of the positive screens as positive and detected 95% (70/74) of the missed lung cancers. As per the Lung-RADS classification, 82% (93/113) of CT(prev) were positive and 60 of them had missed lung cancers. The DL-CAD reported 97% (90/93) of the positive screens as positive and detected 98% (59/60) of the missed lung cancers. The DL-CAD made false positive calls in 10.3% (27/263) of controls, with 0.16 false positive nodules per scan (41/263). In conclusion, the majority of CT(prev) in participants with incidence lung cancers had missed lung cancers, and the DL-CAD detected them with high sensitivity and a limited false positive rate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7759925
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77599252020-12-26 Incidence Lung Cancer after a Negative CT Screening in the National Lung Screening Trial: Deep Learning-Based Detection of Missed Lung Cancers Cho, Jungheum Kim, Jihang Lee, Kyong Joon Nam, Chang Mo Yoon, Sung Hyun Song, Hwayoung Kim, Junghoon Choi, Ye Ra Lee, Kyung Hee Lee, Kyung Won J Clin Med Article We aimed to analyse the CT examinations of the previous screening round (CT(prev)) in NLST participants with incidence lung cancer and evaluate the value of DL-CAD in detection of missed lung cancers. Thoracic radiologists reviewed CT(prev) in participants with incidence lung cancer, and a DL-CAD analysed CT(prev) according to NLST criteria and the lung CT screening reporting & data system (Lung-RADS) classification. We calculated patient-wise and lesion-wise sensitivities of the DL-CAD in detection of missed lung cancers. As per the NLST criteria, 88% (100/113) of CT(prev) were positive and 74 of them had missed lung cancers. The DL-CAD reported 98% (98/100) of the positive screens as positive and detected 95% (70/74) of the missed lung cancers. As per the Lung-RADS classification, 82% (93/113) of CT(prev) were positive and 60 of them had missed lung cancers. The DL-CAD reported 97% (90/93) of the positive screens as positive and detected 98% (59/60) of the missed lung cancers. The DL-CAD made false positive calls in 10.3% (27/263) of controls, with 0.16 false positive nodules per scan (41/263). In conclusion, the majority of CT(prev) in participants with incidence lung cancers had missed lung cancers, and the DL-CAD detected them with high sensitivity and a limited false positive rate. MDPI 2020-12-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7759925/ /pubmed/33276433 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9123908 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Cho, Jungheum
Kim, Jihang
Lee, Kyong Joon
Nam, Chang Mo
Yoon, Sung Hyun
Song, Hwayoung
Kim, Junghoon
Choi, Ye Ra
Lee, Kyung Hee
Lee, Kyung Won
Incidence Lung Cancer after a Negative CT Screening in the National Lung Screening Trial: Deep Learning-Based Detection of Missed Lung Cancers
title Incidence Lung Cancer after a Negative CT Screening in the National Lung Screening Trial: Deep Learning-Based Detection of Missed Lung Cancers
title_full Incidence Lung Cancer after a Negative CT Screening in the National Lung Screening Trial: Deep Learning-Based Detection of Missed Lung Cancers
title_fullStr Incidence Lung Cancer after a Negative CT Screening in the National Lung Screening Trial: Deep Learning-Based Detection of Missed Lung Cancers
title_full_unstemmed Incidence Lung Cancer after a Negative CT Screening in the National Lung Screening Trial: Deep Learning-Based Detection of Missed Lung Cancers
title_short Incidence Lung Cancer after a Negative CT Screening in the National Lung Screening Trial: Deep Learning-Based Detection of Missed Lung Cancers
title_sort incidence lung cancer after a negative ct screening in the national lung screening trial: deep learning-based detection of missed lung cancers
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7759925/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33276433
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9123908
work_keys_str_mv AT chojungheum incidencelungcancerafteranegativectscreeninginthenationallungscreeningtrialdeeplearningbaseddetectionofmissedlungcancers
AT kimjihang incidencelungcancerafteranegativectscreeninginthenationallungscreeningtrialdeeplearningbaseddetectionofmissedlungcancers
AT leekyongjoon incidencelungcancerafteranegativectscreeninginthenationallungscreeningtrialdeeplearningbaseddetectionofmissedlungcancers
AT namchangmo incidencelungcancerafteranegativectscreeninginthenationallungscreeningtrialdeeplearningbaseddetectionofmissedlungcancers
AT yoonsunghyun incidencelungcancerafteranegativectscreeninginthenationallungscreeningtrialdeeplearningbaseddetectionofmissedlungcancers
AT songhwayoung incidencelungcancerafteranegativectscreeninginthenationallungscreeningtrialdeeplearningbaseddetectionofmissedlungcancers
AT kimjunghoon incidencelungcancerafteranegativectscreeninginthenationallungscreeningtrialdeeplearningbaseddetectionofmissedlungcancers
AT choiyera incidencelungcancerafteranegativectscreeninginthenationallungscreeningtrialdeeplearningbaseddetectionofmissedlungcancers
AT leekyunghee incidencelungcancerafteranegativectscreeninginthenationallungscreeningtrialdeeplearningbaseddetectionofmissedlungcancers
AT leekyungwon incidencelungcancerafteranegativectscreeninginthenationallungscreeningtrialdeeplearningbaseddetectionofmissedlungcancers