Cargando…

Comparison of Venous and Capillary Sampling in Oral Glucose Testing for the Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Diagnostic Accuracy Cross-Sectional Study Using Accu-Chek Inform II

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common complication with negative impacts on mother and child. The primary aim of this study was to examine whether plasma glucose cutoffs for GDM diagnosis based on venous sampling can be replaced by cutoffs based on capillary sampling. A prospective cross-s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nevander, Sofia, Landberg, Eva, Blomberg, Marie, Ekman, Bertil, Lilliecreutz, Caroline
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7760160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33255868
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10121011
_version_ 1783627267564371968
author Nevander, Sofia
Landberg, Eva
Blomberg, Marie
Ekman, Bertil
Lilliecreutz, Caroline
author_facet Nevander, Sofia
Landberg, Eva
Blomberg, Marie
Ekman, Bertil
Lilliecreutz, Caroline
author_sort Nevander, Sofia
collection PubMed
description Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common complication with negative impacts on mother and child. The primary aim of this study was to examine whether plasma glucose cutoffs for GDM diagnosis based on venous sampling can be replaced by cutoffs based on capillary sampling. A prospective cross-sectional study was performed at an antenatal care clinic including 175 pregnant women undergoing an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Duplicate samples were collected by capillary and venous puncture while fasting and 1 h and 2 h after an OGTT. Both samples were analyzed on Accu-Chek Inform II. The cutoffs for a GDM diagnosis using capillary samples were corrected from 5.1 to 5.3 mmol/L for the fasting sample, from 10.0 to 11.1 mmol/L for the 1 h sample, and from 8.5 to 9.4 mmol/L for the 2-h sample using half of the dataset. Applying these cutoffs to the remaining dataset resulted in a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 85.0%, 95.0%, and 90.3%, respectively, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 83%, an negative predictive value (NPV) of 96%, and a positive negative likelihood ratio (LHR) of 16.4 using capillary sampling for the GDM diagnosis at fasting and 2-h after. Corrected cutoffs and capillary samples can be used for the diagnosis of GDM with maintained diagnostic accuracy using Accu-Chek Inform II.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7760160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77601602020-12-26 Comparison of Venous and Capillary Sampling in Oral Glucose Testing for the Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Diagnostic Accuracy Cross-Sectional Study Using Accu-Chek Inform II Nevander, Sofia Landberg, Eva Blomberg, Marie Ekman, Bertil Lilliecreutz, Caroline Diagnostics (Basel) Article Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common complication with negative impacts on mother and child. The primary aim of this study was to examine whether plasma glucose cutoffs for GDM diagnosis based on venous sampling can be replaced by cutoffs based on capillary sampling. A prospective cross-sectional study was performed at an antenatal care clinic including 175 pregnant women undergoing an oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). Duplicate samples were collected by capillary and venous puncture while fasting and 1 h and 2 h after an OGTT. Both samples were analyzed on Accu-Chek Inform II. The cutoffs for a GDM diagnosis using capillary samples were corrected from 5.1 to 5.3 mmol/L for the fasting sample, from 10.0 to 11.1 mmol/L for the 1 h sample, and from 8.5 to 9.4 mmol/L for the 2-h sample using half of the dataset. Applying these cutoffs to the remaining dataset resulted in a sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of 85.0%, 95.0%, and 90.3%, respectively, with a positive predictive value (PPV) of 83%, an negative predictive value (NPV) of 96%, and a positive negative likelihood ratio (LHR) of 16.4 using capillary sampling for the GDM diagnosis at fasting and 2-h after. Corrected cutoffs and capillary samples can be used for the diagnosis of GDM with maintained diagnostic accuracy using Accu-Chek Inform II. MDPI 2020-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7760160/ /pubmed/33255868 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10121011 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Nevander, Sofia
Landberg, Eva
Blomberg, Marie
Ekman, Bertil
Lilliecreutz, Caroline
Comparison of Venous and Capillary Sampling in Oral Glucose Testing for the Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Diagnostic Accuracy Cross-Sectional Study Using Accu-Chek Inform II
title Comparison of Venous and Capillary Sampling in Oral Glucose Testing for the Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Diagnostic Accuracy Cross-Sectional Study Using Accu-Chek Inform II
title_full Comparison of Venous and Capillary Sampling in Oral Glucose Testing for the Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Diagnostic Accuracy Cross-Sectional Study Using Accu-Chek Inform II
title_fullStr Comparison of Venous and Capillary Sampling in Oral Glucose Testing for the Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Diagnostic Accuracy Cross-Sectional Study Using Accu-Chek Inform II
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Venous and Capillary Sampling in Oral Glucose Testing for the Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Diagnostic Accuracy Cross-Sectional Study Using Accu-Chek Inform II
title_short Comparison of Venous and Capillary Sampling in Oral Glucose Testing for the Diagnosis of Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: A Diagnostic Accuracy Cross-Sectional Study Using Accu-Chek Inform II
title_sort comparison of venous and capillary sampling in oral glucose testing for the diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus: a diagnostic accuracy cross-sectional study using accu-chek inform ii
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7760160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33255868
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics10121011
work_keys_str_mv AT nevandersofia comparisonofvenousandcapillarysamplinginoralglucosetestingforthediagnosisofgestationaldiabetesmellitusadiagnosticaccuracycrosssectionalstudyusingaccuchekinformii
AT landbergeva comparisonofvenousandcapillarysamplinginoralglucosetestingforthediagnosisofgestationaldiabetesmellitusadiagnosticaccuracycrosssectionalstudyusingaccuchekinformii
AT blombergmarie comparisonofvenousandcapillarysamplinginoralglucosetestingforthediagnosisofgestationaldiabetesmellitusadiagnosticaccuracycrosssectionalstudyusingaccuchekinformii
AT ekmanbertil comparisonofvenousandcapillarysamplinginoralglucosetestingforthediagnosisofgestationaldiabetesmellitusadiagnosticaccuracycrosssectionalstudyusingaccuchekinformii
AT lilliecreutzcaroline comparisonofvenousandcapillarysamplinginoralglucosetestingforthediagnosisofgestationaldiabetesmellitusadiagnosticaccuracycrosssectionalstudyusingaccuchekinformii