Cargando…
Molecular Testing in CML between Old and New Methods: Are We at a Turning Point?
Molecular monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) and BCR-ABL1 kinase domain (KD) mutation testing have a well consolidated role in the routine management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients, as they provide precious information for therapeutic decision-making. Molecular response levels...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7760306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33261150 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9123865 |
_version_ | 1783627301768921088 |
---|---|
author | Soverini, Simona Bernardi, Simona Galimberti, Sara |
author_facet | Soverini, Simona Bernardi, Simona Galimberti, Sara |
author_sort | Soverini, Simona |
collection | PubMed |
description | Molecular monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) and BCR-ABL1 kinase domain (KD) mutation testing have a well consolidated role in the routine management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients, as they provide precious information for therapeutic decision-making. Molecular response levels are used to define whether a patient has an “optimal”, “warning”, or “failure” response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Mutation status may be useful to decide whether TKI therapy should be changed and which alternative TKI (or TKIs) are most likely to be effective. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-qPCR) and Sanger sequencing are currently the gold standard for molecular response monitoring and mutation testing, respectively. However, in recent years, novel technologies such as digital PCR (dPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) have been evaluated. Here, we critically describe the main features of these old and novel technologies, provide an overview of the recently published studies assessing the potential clinical value of dPCR and NGS, and discuss how the state of the art might evolve in the next years. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7760306 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77603062020-12-26 Molecular Testing in CML between Old and New Methods: Are We at a Turning Point? Soverini, Simona Bernardi, Simona Galimberti, Sara J Clin Med Review Molecular monitoring of minimal residual disease (MRD) and BCR-ABL1 kinase domain (KD) mutation testing have a well consolidated role in the routine management of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) patients, as they provide precious information for therapeutic decision-making. Molecular response levels are used to define whether a patient has an “optimal”, “warning”, or “failure” response to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. Mutation status may be useful to decide whether TKI therapy should be changed and which alternative TKI (or TKIs) are most likely to be effective. Real-time quantitative polymerase chain reaction (RQ-qPCR) and Sanger sequencing are currently the gold standard for molecular response monitoring and mutation testing, respectively. However, in recent years, novel technologies such as digital PCR (dPCR) and next-generation sequencing (NGS) have been evaluated. Here, we critically describe the main features of these old and novel technologies, provide an overview of the recently published studies assessing the potential clinical value of dPCR and NGS, and discuss how the state of the art might evolve in the next years. MDPI 2020-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7760306/ /pubmed/33261150 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9123865 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Soverini, Simona Bernardi, Simona Galimberti, Sara Molecular Testing in CML between Old and New Methods: Are We at a Turning Point? |
title | Molecular Testing in CML between Old and New Methods: Are We at a Turning Point? |
title_full | Molecular Testing in CML between Old and New Methods: Are We at a Turning Point? |
title_fullStr | Molecular Testing in CML between Old and New Methods: Are We at a Turning Point? |
title_full_unstemmed | Molecular Testing in CML between Old and New Methods: Are We at a Turning Point? |
title_short | Molecular Testing in CML between Old and New Methods: Are We at a Turning Point? |
title_sort | molecular testing in cml between old and new methods: are we at a turning point? |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7760306/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33261150 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9123865 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT soverinisimona moleculartestingincmlbetweenoldandnewmethodsareweataturningpoint AT bernardisimona moleculartestingincmlbetweenoldandnewmethodsareweataturningpoint AT galimbertisara moleculartestingincmlbetweenoldandnewmethodsareweataturningpoint |