Cargando…

Women’s Intentions to Engage in Risk-Reducing Behaviours after Receiving Personal Ovarian Cancer Risk Information: An Experimental Survey Study

SIMPLE SUMMARY: Risk stratification using genetic testing to identify women at increased risk of ovarian cancer may increase the number of patients to whom risk-reducing surgery (e.g., salpingo-oophorectomy) may be offered. However, little is known about public acceptability of such approaches. Our...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gallagher, Ailish, Waller, Jo, Manchanda, Ranjit, Jacobs, Ian, Sanderson, Saskia
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7760356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33260928
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12123543
_version_ 1783627313571692544
author Gallagher, Ailish
Waller, Jo
Manchanda, Ranjit
Jacobs, Ian
Sanderson, Saskia
author_facet Gallagher, Ailish
Waller, Jo
Manchanda, Ranjit
Jacobs, Ian
Sanderson, Saskia
author_sort Gallagher, Ailish
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: Risk stratification using genetic testing to identify women at increased risk of ovarian cancer may increase the number of patients to whom risk-reducing surgery (e.g., salpingo-oophorectomy) may be offered. However, little is known about public acceptability of such approaches. Our online experimental survey aimed to explore whether women aged 45–75 in the general population are willing to undergo ovarian cancer risk assessment, including genetic testing, and whether women’s potential acceptance of risk-reducing surgery differs depending on their estimated risk. We looked at whether psychological and cognitive factors mediated women’s decision-making. The majority of participants would be interested in having genetic testing. In response to our hypothetical scenarios, a substantial proportion of participants were open to the idea of surgery to reduce risk of ovarian cancer, even if their absolute lifetime risk is only increased from 2% to 5 or 10%. ABSTRACT: Risk stratification using genetic and/or other types of information could identify women at increased ovarian cancer risk. The aim of this study was to examine women’s potential reactions to ovarian cancer risk stratification. A total of 1017 women aged 45–75 years took part in an online experimental survey. Women were randomly assigned to one of three experimental conditions describing hypothetical personal results from ovarian cancer risk stratification, and asked to imagine they had received one of three results: (a) 5% lifetime risk due to single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and lifestyle factors; (b) 10% lifetime risk due to SNPs and lifestyle factors; (c) 10% lifetime risk due to a single rare mutation in a gene. Results: 83% of women indicated interest in having ovarian cancer risk assessment. After receiving their hypothetical risk estimates, 29% of women stated they would have risk-reducing surgery. Choosing risk-reducing surgery over other behavioural responses was associated with having higher surgery self-efficacy and perceived response-efficacy, but not with perceptions of disease threat, i.e., perceived risk or severity, or with experimental condition. A substantial proportion of women age 45–75 years may be open to the idea of surgery to reduce risk of ovarian cancer, even if their absolute lifetime risk is only increased to as little as 5 or 10%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7760356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77603562020-12-26 Women’s Intentions to Engage in Risk-Reducing Behaviours after Receiving Personal Ovarian Cancer Risk Information: An Experimental Survey Study Gallagher, Ailish Waller, Jo Manchanda, Ranjit Jacobs, Ian Sanderson, Saskia Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Risk stratification using genetic testing to identify women at increased risk of ovarian cancer may increase the number of patients to whom risk-reducing surgery (e.g., salpingo-oophorectomy) may be offered. However, little is known about public acceptability of such approaches. Our online experimental survey aimed to explore whether women aged 45–75 in the general population are willing to undergo ovarian cancer risk assessment, including genetic testing, and whether women’s potential acceptance of risk-reducing surgery differs depending on their estimated risk. We looked at whether psychological and cognitive factors mediated women’s decision-making. The majority of participants would be interested in having genetic testing. In response to our hypothetical scenarios, a substantial proportion of participants were open to the idea of surgery to reduce risk of ovarian cancer, even if their absolute lifetime risk is only increased from 2% to 5 or 10%. ABSTRACT: Risk stratification using genetic and/or other types of information could identify women at increased ovarian cancer risk. The aim of this study was to examine women’s potential reactions to ovarian cancer risk stratification. A total of 1017 women aged 45–75 years took part in an online experimental survey. Women were randomly assigned to one of three experimental conditions describing hypothetical personal results from ovarian cancer risk stratification, and asked to imagine they had received one of three results: (a) 5% lifetime risk due to single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and lifestyle factors; (b) 10% lifetime risk due to SNPs and lifestyle factors; (c) 10% lifetime risk due to a single rare mutation in a gene. Results: 83% of women indicated interest in having ovarian cancer risk assessment. After receiving their hypothetical risk estimates, 29% of women stated they would have risk-reducing surgery. Choosing risk-reducing surgery over other behavioural responses was associated with having higher surgery self-efficacy and perceived response-efficacy, but not with perceptions of disease threat, i.e., perceived risk or severity, or with experimental condition. A substantial proportion of women age 45–75 years may be open to the idea of surgery to reduce risk of ovarian cancer, even if their absolute lifetime risk is only increased to as little as 5 or 10%. MDPI 2020-11-27 /pmc/articles/PMC7760356/ /pubmed/33260928 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12123543 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Gallagher, Ailish
Waller, Jo
Manchanda, Ranjit
Jacobs, Ian
Sanderson, Saskia
Women’s Intentions to Engage in Risk-Reducing Behaviours after Receiving Personal Ovarian Cancer Risk Information: An Experimental Survey Study
title Women’s Intentions to Engage in Risk-Reducing Behaviours after Receiving Personal Ovarian Cancer Risk Information: An Experimental Survey Study
title_full Women’s Intentions to Engage in Risk-Reducing Behaviours after Receiving Personal Ovarian Cancer Risk Information: An Experimental Survey Study
title_fullStr Women’s Intentions to Engage in Risk-Reducing Behaviours after Receiving Personal Ovarian Cancer Risk Information: An Experimental Survey Study
title_full_unstemmed Women’s Intentions to Engage in Risk-Reducing Behaviours after Receiving Personal Ovarian Cancer Risk Information: An Experimental Survey Study
title_short Women’s Intentions to Engage in Risk-Reducing Behaviours after Receiving Personal Ovarian Cancer Risk Information: An Experimental Survey Study
title_sort women’s intentions to engage in risk-reducing behaviours after receiving personal ovarian cancer risk information: an experimental survey study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7760356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33260928
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12123543
work_keys_str_mv AT gallagherailish womensintentionstoengageinriskreducingbehavioursafterreceivingpersonalovariancancerriskinformationanexperimentalsurveystudy
AT wallerjo womensintentionstoengageinriskreducingbehavioursafterreceivingpersonalovariancancerriskinformationanexperimentalsurveystudy
AT manchandaranjit womensintentionstoengageinriskreducingbehavioursafterreceivingpersonalovariancancerriskinformationanexperimentalsurveystudy
AT jacobsian womensintentionstoengageinriskreducingbehavioursafterreceivingpersonalovariancancerriskinformationanexperimentalsurveystudy
AT sandersonsaskia womensintentionstoengageinriskreducingbehavioursafterreceivingpersonalovariancancerriskinformationanexperimentalsurveystudy