Cargando…

Optimisation of Urine Sample Preparation for Headspace-Solid Phase Microextraction Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry: Altering Sample pH, Sulphuric Acid Concentration and Phase Ratio

Headspace-solid phase microextraction gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS) can be used to measure volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in human urine. However, there is no widely adopted standardised protocol for the preparation of urine samples for analysis resulting in an inability to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Aggarwal, Prashant, Baker, James, Boyd, Mark T., Coyle, Séamus, Probert, Chris, Chapman, Elinor A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7760603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33255680
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo10120482
_version_ 1783627371863080960
author Aggarwal, Prashant
Baker, James
Boyd, Mark T.
Coyle, Séamus
Probert, Chris
Chapman, Elinor A.
author_facet Aggarwal, Prashant
Baker, James
Boyd, Mark T.
Coyle, Séamus
Probert, Chris
Chapman, Elinor A.
author_sort Aggarwal, Prashant
collection PubMed
description Headspace-solid phase microextraction gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS) can be used to measure volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in human urine. However, there is no widely adopted standardised protocol for the preparation of urine samples for analysis resulting in an inability to compare studies reliably between laboratories. This paper investigated the effect of altering urine sample pH, volume, and vial size for optimising detection of VOCs when using HS-SPME-GC-MS. This is the first, direct comparison of H(2)SO(4), HCl, and NaOH as treatment techniques prior to HS-SPME-GC-MS analysis. Altering urine sample pH indicates that H(2)SO(4) is more effective at optimising detection of VOCs than HCl or NaOH. H(2)SO(4) resulted in a significantly larger mean number of VOCs being identified per sample (on average, 33.5 VOCs to 24.3 in HCl or 12.2 in NaOH treated urine) and more unique VOCs, produced a more diverse range of classes of VOCs, and led to less HS-SPME-GC-MS degradation. We propose that adding 0.2 mL of 2.5 M H(2)SO(4) to 1 mL of urine within a 10 mL headspace vial is the optimal sample preparation prior to HS-SPME-GC-MS analysis. We hope the use of our optimised method for urinary HS-SPME-GC-MS analysis will enhance our understanding of human disease and bolster metabolic biomarker identification.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7760603
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77606032020-12-26 Optimisation of Urine Sample Preparation for Headspace-Solid Phase Microextraction Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry: Altering Sample pH, Sulphuric Acid Concentration and Phase Ratio Aggarwal, Prashant Baker, James Boyd, Mark T. Coyle, Séamus Probert, Chris Chapman, Elinor A. Metabolites Article Headspace-solid phase microextraction gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (HS-SPME-GC-MS) can be used to measure volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in human urine. However, there is no widely adopted standardised protocol for the preparation of urine samples for analysis resulting in an inability to compare studies reliably between laboratories. This paper investigated the effect of altering urine sample pH, volume, and vial size for optimising detection of VOCs when using HS-SPME-GC-MS. This is the first, direct comparison of H(2)SO(4), HCl, and NaOH as treatment techniques prior to HS-SPME-GC-MS analysis. Altering urine sample pH indicates that H(2)SO(4) is more effective at optimising detection of VOCs than HCl or NaOH. H(2)SO(4) resulted in a significantly larger mean number of VOCs being identified per sample (on average, 33.5 VOCs to 24.3 in HCl or 12.2 in NaOH treated urine) and more unique VOCs, produced a more diverse range of classes of VOCs, and led to less HS-SPME-GC-MS degradation. We propose that adding 0.2 mL of 2.5 M H(2)SO(4) to 1 mL of urine within a 10 mL headspace vial is the optimal sample preparation prior to HS-SPME-GC-MS analysis. We hope the use of our optimised method for urinary HS-SPME-GC-MS analysis will enhance our understanding of human disease and bolster metabolic biomarker identification. MDPI 2020-11-25 /pmc/articles/PMC7760603/ /pubmed/33255680 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo10120482 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Aggarwal, Prashant
Baker, James
Boyd, Mark T.
Coyle, Séamus
Probert, Chris
Chapman, Elinor A.
Optimisation of Urine Sample Preparation for Headspace-Solid Phase Microextraction Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry: Altering Sample pH, Sulphuric Acid Concentration and Phase Ratio
title Optimisation of Urine Sample Preparation for Headspace-Solid Phase Microextraction Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry: Altering Sample pH, Sulphuric Acid Concentration and Phase Ratio
title_full Optimisation of Urine Sample Preparation for Headspace-Solid Phase Microextraction Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry: Altering Sample pH, Sulphuric Acid Concentration and Phase Ratio
title_fullStr Optimisation of Urine Sample Preparation for Headspace-Solid Phase Microextraction Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry: Altering Sample pH, Sulphuric Acid Concentration and Phase Ratio
title_full_unstemmed Optimisation of Urine Sample Preparation for Headspace-Solid Phase Microextraction Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry: Altering Sample pH, Sulphuric Acid Concentration and Phase Ratio
title_short Optimisation of Urine Sample Preparation for Headspace-Solid Phase Microextraction Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry: Altering Sample pH, Sulphuric Acid Concentration and Phase Ratio
title_sort optimisation of urine sample preparation for headspace-solid phase microextraction gas chromatography-mass spectrometry: altering sample ph, sulphuric acid concentration and phase ratio
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7760603/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33255680
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/metabo10120482
work_keys_str_mv AT aggarwalprashant optimisationofurinesamplepreparationforheadspacesolidphasemicroextractiongaschromatographymassspectrometryalteringsamplephsulphuricacidconcentrationandphaseratio
AT bakerjames optimisationofurinesamplepreparationforheadspacesolidphasemicroextractiongaschromatographymassspectrometryalteringsamplephsulphuricacidconcentrationandphaseratio
AT boydmarkt optimisationofurinesamplepreparationforheadspacesolidphasemicroextractiongaschromatographymassspectrometryalteringsamplephsulphuricacidconcentrationandphaseratio
AT coyleseamus optimisationofurinesamplepreparationforheadspacesolidphasemicroextractiongaschromatographymassspectrometryalteringsamplephsulphuricacidconcentrationandphaseratio
AT probertchris optimisationofurinesamplepreparationforheadspacesolidphasemicroextractiongaschromatographymassspectrometryalteringsamplephsulphuricacidconcentrationandphaseratio
AT chapmanelinora optimisationofurinesamplepreparationforheadspacesolidphasemicroextractiongaschromatographymassspectrometryalteringsamplephsulphuricacidconcentrationandphaseratio