Cargando…
Clinical and Molecular Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk
Prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk becomes increasingly important with recently emerging HCC-predisposing conditions, namely non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and cured hepatitis C virus infection. These etiologies are accompanied with a relatively low HCC incidence rate (~1% per year...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7761278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256232 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9123843 |
_version_ | 1783627531067326464 |
---|---|
author | Kubota, Naoto Fujiwara, Naoto Hoshida, Yujin |
author_facet | Kubota, Naoto Fujiwara, Naoto Hoshida, Yujin |
author_sort | Kubota, Naoto |
collection | PubMed |
description | Prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk becomes increasingly important with recently emerging HCC-predisposing conditions, namely non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and cured hepatitis C virus infection. These etiologies are accompanied with a relatively low HCC incidence rate (~1% per year or less), while affecting a large patient population. Hepatitis B virus infection remains a major HCC risk factor, but a majority of the patients are now on antiviral therapy, which substantially lowers, but does not eliminate, HCC risk. Thus, it is critically important to identify a small subset of patients who have elevated likelihood of developing HCC, to optimize the allocation of limited HCC screening resources to those who need it most and enable cost-effective early HCC diagnosis to prolong patient survival. To date, numerous clinical-variable-based HCC risk scores have been developed for specific clinical contexts defined by liver disease etiology, severity, and other factors. In parallel, various molecular features have been reported as potential HCC risk biomarkers, utilizing both tissue and body-fluid specimens. Deep-learning-based risk modeling is an emerging strategy. Although none of them has been widely incorporated in clinical care of liver disease patients yet, some have been undergoing the process of validation and clinical development. In this review, these risk scores and biomarker candidates are overviewed, and strategic issues in their validation and clinical translation are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7761278 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77612782020-12-26 Clinical and Molecular Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk Kubota, Naoto Fujiwara, Naoto Hoshida, Yujin J Clin Med Review Prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) risk becomes increasingly important with recently emerging HCC-predisposing conditions, namely non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and cured hepatitis C virus infection. These etiologies are accompanied with a relatively low HCC incidence rate (~1% per year or less), while affecting a large patient population. Hepatitis B virus infection remains a major HCC risk factor, but a majority of the patients are now on antiviral therapy, which substantially lowers, but does not eliminate, HCC risk. Thus, it is critically important to identify a small subset of patients who have elevated likelihood of developing HCC, to optimize the allocation of limited HCC screening resources to those who need it most and enable cost-effective early HCC diagnosis to prolong patient survival. To date, numerous clinical-variable-based HCC risk scores have been developed for specific clinical contexts defined by liver disease etiology, severity, and other factors. In parallel, various molecular features have been reported as potential HCC risk biomarkers, utilizing both tissue and body-fluid specimens. Deep-learning-based risk modeling is an emerging strategy. Although none of them has been widely incorporated in clinical care of liver disease patients yet, some have been undergoing the process of validation and clinical development. In this review, these risk scores and biomarker candidates are overviewed, and strategic issues in their validation and clinical translation are discussed. MDPI 2020-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7761278/ /pubmed/33256232 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9123843 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Kubota, Naoto Fujiwara, Naoto Hoshida, Yujin Clinical and Molecular Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk |
title | Clinical and Molecular Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk |
title_full | Clinical and Molecular Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk |
title_fullStr | Clinical and Molecular Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical and Molecular Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk |
title_short | Clinical and Molecular Prediction of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Risk |
title_sort | clinical and molecular prediction of hepatocellular carcinoma risk |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7761278/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33256232 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9123843 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kubotanaoto clinicalandmolecularpredictionofhepatocellularcarcinomarisk AT fujiwaranaoto clinicalandmolecularpredictionofhepatocellularcarcinomarisk AT hoshidayujin clinicalandmolecularpredictionofhepatocellularcarcinomarisk |