Cargando…
Comprehensive Statistical Evaluation of Etest(®), UMIC(®), MicroScan and Disc Diffusion versus Standard Broth Microdilution: Workflow for an Accurate Detection of Colistin-Resistant and Mcr-Positive E. coli
Four colistin susceptibility testing methods were compared with the standard broth microdilution (BMD) in a collection of 75 colistin-susceptible and 75 mcr-positive E. coli, including ST131 isolates. Taking BMD as reference, all methods showed similar categorical agreement rates (CA) of circa 90%,...
Autores principales: | García-Meniño, Isidro, Lumbreras, Pilar, Valledor, Pablo, Díaz-Jiménez, Dafne, Lestón, Luz, Fernández, Javier, Mora, Azucena |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7761637/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33287187 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics9120861 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Comparison of disc diffusion, Etest and broth microdilution for testing susceptibility of carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa to polymyxins
por: van der Heijden, Inneke M, et al.
Publicado: (2007) -
644. Comparative Evaluation of ETEST® ERV bioMérieux with the CLSI Broth Microdilution Method for Eravacycline MIC Determination
por: Sauvonnet, Veronique, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
656. Sulbactam-Durlobactam MIC Determination: Comparative Evaluation of the New ETEST(®) SUD to the CLSI 2021 Broth Microdilution Method
por: Sauvonnet, Veronique, et al.
Publicado: (2021) -
Comparative Evaluation of Vitek 2 and Etest versus Broth Microdilution for Ceftazidime/Avibactam and Ceftolozane/Tazobactam Susceptibility Testing of Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa
por: Papadomanolaki, Arhodoula, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
The accuracy of four commercial broth microdilution tests in the determination of the minimum inhibitory concentration of colistin
por: Yusuf, Erlangga, et al.
Publicado: (2020)