Cargando…

A Comparative Study of Approaches to Improve the Sensitivity of Lateral Flow Immunoassay of the Antibiotic Lincomycin

This study provides a comparative assessment of the various nanodispersed markers and related detection techniques used in the immunochromatographic detection of an antibiotic lincomycin (LIN). Improving the sensitivity of the competitive lateral flow immunoassay is important, given the increasing d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Serebrennikova, Kseniya V., Hendrickson, Olga D., Zvereva, Elena A., Popravko, Demid S., Zherdev, Anatoly V., Xu, Chuanlai, Dzantiev, Boris B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7761767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33287157
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios10120198
_version_ 1783627645743792128
author Serebrennikova, Kseniya V.
Hendrickson, Olga D.
Zvereva, Elena A.
Popravko, Demid S.
Zherdev, Anatoly V.
Xu, Chuanlai
Dzantiev, Boris B.
author_facet Serebrennikova, Kseniya V.
Hendrickson, Olga D.
Zvereva, Elena A.
Popravko, Demid S.
Zherdev, Anatoly V.
Xu, Chuanlai
Dzantiev, Boris B.
author_sort Serebrennikova, Kseniya V.
collection PubMed
description This study provides a comparative assessment of the various nanodispersed markers and related detection techniques used in the immunochromatographic detection of an antibiotic lincomycin (LIN). Improving the sensitivity of the competitive lateral flow immunoassay is important, given the increasing demands for the monitoring of chemical contaminants in food. Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and CdSe/ZnS quantum dots (QDs) were used for the development and comparison of three approaches for the lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) of LIN, namely, colorimetric, fluorescence, and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS)-based LFIAs. It was demonstrated that, for colorimetric and fluorescence analysis, the detection limits were comparable at 0.4 and 0.2 ng/mL, respectively. A SERS-based method allowed achieving the gain of five orders of magnitude in the assay sensitivity (1.4 fg/mL) compared to conventional LFIAs. Therefore, an integration of a SERS reporter into the LFIA is a promising tool for extremely sensitive quantitative detection of target analytes. However, implementation of this time-consuming technique requires expensive equipment and skilled personnel. In contrast, conventional AuNP- and QD-based LFIAs can provide simple, rapid, and inexpensive point-of-care testing for practical use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7761767
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77617672020-12-26 A Comparative Study of Approaches to Improve the Sensitivity of Lateral Flow Immunoassay of the Antibiotic Lincomycin Serebrennikova, Kseniya V. Hendrickson, Olga D. Zvereva, Elena A. Popravko, Demid S. Zherdev, Anatoly V. Xu, Chuanlai Dzantiev, Boris B. Biosensors (Basel) Article This study provides a comparative assessment of the various nanodispersed markers and related detection techniques used in the immunochromatographic detection of an antibiotic lincomycin (LIN). Improving the sensitivity of the competitive lateral flow immunoassay is important, given the increasing demands for the monitoring of chemical contaminants in food. Gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) and CdSe/ZnS quantum dots (QDs) were used for the development and comparison of three approaches for the lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) of LIN, namely, colorimetric, fluorescence, and surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy (SERS)-based LFIAs. It was demonstrated that, for colorimetric and fluorescence analysis, the detection limits were comparable at 0.4 and 0.2 ng/mL, respectively. A SERS-based method allowed achieving the gain of five orders of magnitude in the assay sensitivity (1.4 fg/mL) compared to conventional LFIAs. Therefore, an integration of a SERS reporter into the LFIA is a promising tool for extremely sensitive quantitative detection of target analytes. However, implementation of this time-consuming technique requires expensive equipment and skilled personnel. In contrast, conventional AuNP- and QD-based LFIAs can provide simple, rapid, and inexpensive point-of-care testing for practical use. MDPI 2020-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7761767/ /pubmed/33287157 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios10120198 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Serebrennikova, Kseniya V.
Hendrickson, Olga D.
Zvereva, Elena A.
Popravko, Demid S.
Zherdev, Anatoly V.
Xu, Chuanlai
Dzantiev, Boris B.
A Comparative Study of Approaches to Improve the Sensitivity of Lateral Flow Immunoassay of the Antibiotic Lincomycin
title A Comparative Study of Approaches to Improve the Sensitivity of Lateral Flow Immunoassay of the Antibiotic Lincomycin
title_full A Comparative Study of Approaches to Improve the Sensitivity of Lateral Flow Immunoassay of the Antibiotic Lincomycin
title_fullStr A Comparative Study of Approaches to Improve the Sensitivity of Lateral Flow Immunoassay of the Antibiotic Lincomycin
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study of Approaches to Improve the Sensitivity of Lateral Flow Immunoassay of the Antibiotic Lincomycin
title_short A Comparative Study of Approaches to Improve the Sensitivity of Lateral Flow Immunoassay of the Antibiotic Lincomycin
title_sort comparative study of approaches to improve the sensitivity of lateral flow immunoassay of the antibiotic lincomycin
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7761767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33287157
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bios10120198
work_keys_str_mv AT serebrennikovakseniyav acomparativestudyofapproachestoimprovethesensitivityoflateralflowimmunoassayoftheantibioticlincomycin
AT hendricksonolgad acomparativestudyofapproachestoimprovethesensitivityoflateralflowimmunoassayoftheantibioticlincomycin
AT zverevaelenaa acomparativestudyofapproachestoimprovethesensitivityoflateralflowimmunoassayoftheantibioticlincomycin
AT popravkodemids acomparativestudyofapproachestoimprovethesensitivityoflateralflowimmunoassayoftheantibioticlincomycin
AT zherdevanatolyv acomparativestudyofapproachestoimprovethesensitivityoflateralflowimmunoassayoftheantibioticlincomycin
AT xuchuanlai acomparativestudyofapproachestoimprovethesensitivityoflateralflowimmunoassayoftheantibioticlincomycin
AT dzantievborisb acomparativestudyofapproachestoimprovethesensitivityoflateralflowimmunoassayoftheantibioticlincomycin
AT serebrennikovakseniyav comparativestudyofapproachestoimprovethesensitivityoflateralflowimmunoassayoftheantibioticlincomycin
AT hendricksonolgad comparativestudyofapproachestoimprovethesensitivityoflateralflowimmunoassayoftheantibioticlincomycin
AT zverevaelenaa comparativestudyofapproachestoimprovethesensitivityoflateralflowimmunoassayoftheantibioticlincomycin
AT popravkodemids comparativestudyofapproachestoimprovethesensitivityoflateralflowimmunoassayoftheantibioticlincomycin
AT zherdevanatolyv comparativestudyofapproachestoimprovethesensitivityoflateralflowimmunoassayoftheantibioticlincomycin
AT xuchuanlai comparativestudyofapproachestoimprovethesensitivityoflateralflowimmunoassayoftheantibioticlincomycin
AT dzantievborisb comparativestudyofapproachestoimprovethesensitivityoflateralflowimmunoassayoftheantibioticlincomycin