Cargando…
Suitability of Biodegradable Materials in Comparison with Conventional Packaging Materials for the Storage of Fresh Pork Products over Extended Shelf-Life Periods
The packaging of fresh meat has been studied for decades, leading to improved packaging types and conditions such as modified atmosphere packaging (MAP). While commonly used meat packaging uses fossil fuel-based materials, the use of biodegradable packaging materials for this application has not bee...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7761919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33291660 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9121802 |
_version_ | 1783627681423687680 |
---|---|
author | Hawthorne, Luzia M. Beganović, Anel Schwarz, Matthias Noordanus, Aeneas W. Prem, Markus Zapf, Lothar Scheibel, Stefan Margreiter, Gerhard Huck, Christian W. Bach, Katrin |
author_facet | Hawthorne, Luzia M. Beganović, Anel Schwarz, Matthias Noordanus, Aeneas W. Prem, Markus Zapf, Lothar Scheibel, Stefan Margreiter, Gerhard Huck, Christian W. Bach, Katrin |
author_sort | Hawthorne, Luzia M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The packaging of fresh meat has been studied for decades, leading to improved packaging types and conditions such as modified atmosphere packaging (MAP). While commonly used meat packaging uses fossil fuel-based materials, the use of biodegradable packaging materials for this application has not been studied widely. This study aimed at evaluating the sustainability of biodegradable packaging materials compared to established conventional packaging materials through analyses of the quality of freshly packaged pork. The quality was assessed by evaluating sensory aspects, meat color and microbiological attributes of the pork products. The results show no significant differences (p > 0.05) in ground pork and pork loin stored in biodegradable MAP (BioMAP) and conventional MAP for the evaluated sensory attributes, meat color or total bacterial count (TBC) over extended storage times. The data suggest that BioMAP could be a viable alternative to MAP using conventional, fossil fuel-based materials for the storage of fresh meats, while simultaneously fulfilling the customers’ wishes for a more environmentally friendly packaging alternative. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7761919 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77619192020-12-26 Suitability of Biodegradable Materials in Comparison with Conventional Packaging Materials for the Storage of Fresh Pork Products over Extended Shelf-Life Periods Hawthorne, Luzia M. Beganović, Anel Schwarz, Matthias Noordanus, Aeneas W. Prem, Markus Zapf, Lothar Scheibel, Stefan Margreiter, Gerhard Huck, Christian W. Bach, Katrin Foods Article The packaging of fresh meat has been studied for decades, leading to improved packaging types and conditions such as modified atmosphere packaging (MAP). While commonly used meat packaging uses fossil fuel-based materials, the use of biodegradable packaging materials for this application has not been studied widely. This study aimed at evaluating the sustainability of biodegradable packaging materials compared to established conventional packaging materials through analyses of the quality of freshly packaged pork. The quality was assessed by evaluating sensory aspects, meat color and microbiological attributes of the pork products. The results show no significant differences (p > 0.05) in ground pork and pork loin stored in biodegradable MAP (BioMAP) and conventional MAP for the evaluated sensory attributes, meat color or total bacterial count (TBC) over extended storage times. The data suggest that BioMAP could be a viable alternative to MAP using conventional, fossil fuel-based materials for the storage of fresh meats, while simultaneously fulfilling the customers’ wishes for a more environmentally friendly packaging alternative. MDPI 2020-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7761919/ /pubmed/33291660 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9121802 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Hawthorne, Luzia M. Beganović, Anel Schwarz, Matthias Noordanus, Aeneas W. Prem, Markus Zapf, Lothar Scheibel, Stefan Margreiter, Gerhard Huck, Christian W. Bach, Katrin Suitability of Biodegradable Materials in Comparison with Conventional Packaging Materials for the Storage of Fresh Pork Products over Extended Shelf-Life Periods |
title | Suitability of Biodegradable Materials in Comparison with Conventional Packaging Materials for the Storage of Fresh Pork Products over Extended Shelf-Life Periods |
title_full | Suitability of Biodegradable Materials in Comparison with Conventional Packaging Materials for the Storage of Fresh Pork Products over Extended Shelf-Life Periods |
title_fullStr | Suitability of Biodegradable Materials in Comparison with Conventional Packaging Materials for the Storage of Fresh Pork Products over Extended Shelf-Life Periods |
title_full_unstemmed | Suitability of Biodegradable Materials in Comparison with Conventional Packaging Materials for the Storage of Fresh Pork Products over Extended Shelf-Life Periods |
title_short | Suitability of Biodegradable Materials in Comparison with Conventional Packaging Materials for the Storage of Fresh Pork Products over Extended Shelf-Life Periods |
title_sort | suitability of biodegradable materials in comparison with conventional packaging materials for the storage of fresh pork products over extended shelf-life periods |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7761919/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33291660 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9121802 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hawthorneluziam suitabilityofbiodegradablematerialsincomparisonwithconventionalpackagingmaterialsforthestorageoffreshporkproductsoverextendedshelflifeperiods AT beganovicanel suitabilityofbiodegradablematerialsincomparisonwithconventionalpackagingmaterialsforthestorageoffreshporkproductsoverextendedshelflifeperiods AT schwarzmatthias suitabilityofbiodegradablematerialsincomparisonwithconventionalpackagingmaterialsforthestorageoffreshporkproductsoverextendedshelflifeperiods AT noordanusaeneasw suitabilityofbiodegradablematerialsincomparisonwithconventionalpackagingmaterialsforthestorageoffreshporkproductsoverextendedshelflifeperiods AT premmarkus suitabilityofbiodegradablematerialsincomparisonwithconventionalpackagingmaterialsforthestorageoffreshporkproductsoverextendedshelflifeperiods AT zapflothar suitabilityofbiodegradablematerialsincomparisonwithconventionalpackagingmaterialsforthestorageoffreshporkproductsoverextendedshelflifeperiods AT scheibelstefan suitabilityofbiodegradablematerialsincomparisonwithconventionalpackagingmaterialsforthestorageoffreshporkproductsoverextendedshelflifeperiods AT margreitergerhard suitabilityofbiodegradablematerialsincomparisonwithconventionalpackagingmaterialsforthestorageoffreshporkproductsoverextendedshelflifeperiods AT huckchristianw suitabilityofbiodegradablematerialsincomparisonwithconventionalpackagingmaterialsforthestorageoffreshporkproductsoverextendedshelflifeperiods AT bachkatrin suitabilityofbiodegradablematerialsincomparisonwithconventionalpackagingmaterialsforthestorageoffreshporkproductsoverextendedshelflifeperiods |