Cargando…

Suitability of Biodegradable Materials in Comparison with Conventional Packaging Materials for the Storage of Fresh Pork Products over Extended Shelf-Life Periods

The packaging of fresh meat has been studied for decades, leading to improved packaging types and conditions such as modified atmosphere packaging (MAP). While commonly used meat packaging uses fossil fuel-based materials, the use of biodegradable packaging materials for this application has not bee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hawthorne, Luzia M., Beganović, Anel, Schwarz, Matthias, Noordanus, Aeneas W., Prem, Markus, Zapf, Lothar, Scheibel, Stefan, Margreiter, Gerhard, Huck, Christian W., Bach, Katrin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7761919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33291660
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9121802
_version_ 1783627681423687680
author Hawthorne, Luzia M.
Beganović, Anel
Schwarz, Matthias
Noordanus, Aeneas W.
Prem, Markus
Zapf, Lothar
Scheibel, Stefan
Margreiter, Gerhard
Huck, Christian W.
Bach, Katrin
author_facet Hawthorne, Luzia M.
Beganović, Anel
Schwarz, Matthias
Noordanus, Aeneas W.
Prem, Markus
Zapf, Lothar
Scheibel, Stefan
Margreiter, Gerhard
Huck, Christian W.
Bach, Katrin
author_sort Hawthorne, Luzia M.
collection PubMed
description The packaging of fresh meat has been studied for decades, leading to improved packaging types and conditions such as modified atmosphere packaging (MAP). While commonly used meat packaging uses fossil fuel-based materials, the use of biodegradable packaging materials for this application has not been studied widely. This study aimed at evaluating the sustainability of biodegradable packaging materials compared to established conventional packaging materials through analyses of the quality of freshly packaged pork. The quality was assessed by evaluating sensory aspects, meat color and microbiological attributes of the pork products. The results show no significant differences (p > 0.05) in ground pork and pork loin stored in biodegradable MAP (BioMAP) and conventional MAP for the evaluated sensory attributes, meat color or total bacterial count (TBC) over extended storage times. The data suggest that BioMAP could be a viable alternative to MAP using conventional, fossil fuel-based materials for the storage of fresh meats, while simultaneously fulfilling the customers’ wishes for a more environmentally friendly packaging alternative.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7761919
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77619192020-12-26 Suitability of Biodegradable Materials in Comparison with Conventional Packaging Materials for the Storage of Fresh Pork Products over Extended Shelf-Life Periods Hawthorne, Luzia M. Beganović, Anel Schwarz, Matthias Noordanus, Aeneas W. Prem, Markus Zapf, Lothar Scheibel, Stefan Margreiter, Gerhard Huck, Christian W. Bach, Katrin Foods Article The packaging of fresh meat has been studied for decades, leading to improved packaging types and conditions such as modified atmosphere packaging (MAP). While commonly used meat packaging uses fossil fuel-based materials, the use of biodegradable packaging materials for this application has not been studied widely. This study aimed at evaluating the sustainability of biodegradable packaging materials compared to established conventional packaging materials through analyses of the quality of freshly packaged pork. The quality was assessed by evaluating sensory aspects, meat color and microbiological attributes of the pork products. The results show no significant differences (p > 0.05) in ground pork and pork loin stored in biodegradable MAP (BioMAP) and conventional MAP for the evaluated sensory attributes, meat color or total bacterial count (TBC) over extended storage times. The data suggest that BioMAP could be a viable alternative to MAP using conventional, fossil fuel-based materials for the storage of fresh meats, while simultaneously fulfilling the customers’ wishes for a more environmentally friendly packaging alternative. MDPI 2020-12-04 /pmc/articles/PMC7761919/ /pubmed/33291660 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9121802 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hawthorne, Luzia M.
Beganović, Anel
Schwarz, Matthias
Noordanus, Aeneas W.
Prem, Markus
Zapf, Lothar
Scheibel, Stefan
Margreiter, Gerhard
Huck, Christian W.
Bach, Katrin
Suitability of Biodegradable Materials in Comparison with Conventional Packaging Materials for the Storage of Fresh Pork Products over Extended Shelf-Life Periods
title Suitability of Biodegradable Materials in Comparison with Conventional Packaging Materials for the Storage of Fresh Pork Products over Extended Shelf-Life Periods
title_full Suitability of Biodegradable Materials in Comparison with Conventional Packaging Materials for the Storage of Fresh Pork Products over Extended Shelf-Life Periods
title_fullStr Suitability of Biodegradable Materials in Comparison with Conventional Packaging Materials for the Storage of Fresh Pork Products over Extended Shelf-Life Periods
title_full_unstemmed Suitability of Biodegradable Materials in Comparison with Conventional Packaging Materials for the Storage of Fresh Pork Products over Extended Shelf-Life Periods
title_short Suitability of Biodegradable Materials in Comparison with Conventional Packaging Materials for the Storage of Fresh Pork Products over Extended Shelf-Life Periods
title_sort suitability of biodegradable materials in comparison with conventional packaging materials for the storage of fresh pork products over extended shelf-life periods
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7761919/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33291660
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods9121802
work_keys_str_mv AT hawthorneluziam suitabilityofbiodegradablematerialsincomparisonwithconventionalpackagingmaterialsforthestorageoffreshporkproductsoverextendedshelflifeperiods
AT beganovicanel suitabilityofbiodegradablematerialsincomparisonwithconventionalpackagingmaterialsforthestorageoffreshporkproductsoverextendedshelflifeperiods
AT schwarzmatthias suitabilityofbiodegradablematerialsincomparisonwithconventionalpackagingmaterialsforthestorageoffreshporkproductsoverextendedshelflifeperiods
AT noordanusaeneasw suitabilityofbiodegradablematerialsincomparisonwithconventionalpackagingmaterialsforthestorageoffreshporkproductsoverextendedshelflifeperiods
AT premmarkus suitabilityofbiodegradablematerialsincomparisonwithconventionalpackagingmaterialsforthestorageoffreshporkproductsoverextendedshelflifeperiods
AT zapflothar suitabilityofbiodegradablematerialsincomparisonwithconventionalpackagingmaterialsforthestorageoffreshporkproductsoverextendedshelflifeperiods
AT scheibelstefan suitabilityofbiodegradablematerialsincomparisonwithconventionalpackagingmaterialsforthestorageoffreshporkproductsoverextendedshelflifeperiods
AT margreitergerhard suitabilityofbiodegradablematerialsincomparisonwithconventionalpackagingmaterialsforthestorageoffreshporkproductsoverextendedshelflifeperiods
AT huckchristianw suitabilityofbiodegradablematerialsincomparisonwithconventionalpackagingmaterialsforthestorageoffreshporkproductsoverextendedshelflifeperiods
AT bachkatrin suitabilityofbiodegradablematerialsincomparisonwithconventionalpackagingmaterialsforthestorageoffreshporkproductsoverextendedshelflifeperiods