Cargando…

Membrane Bioreactor Technology: The Effect of Membrane Filtration on Biogas Potential of the Excess Sludge

Although the membrane bioreactor technology is gaining increasing interest because of high efficiency of wastewater treatment and reuse, data on the anaerobic transformations of retentate are scarce and divergent. The effects of transmembrane pressure (TMP) in microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltratio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zielińska, Magdalena, Bernat, Katarzyna, Mikucka, Wioleta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7762199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33291247
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes10120397
_version_ 1783627748277747712
author Zielińska, Magdalena
Bernat, Katarzyna
Mikucka, Wioleta
author_facet Zielińska, Magdalena
Bernat, Katarzyna
Mikucka, Wioleta
author_sort Zielińska, Magdalena
collection PubMed
description Although the membrane bioreactor technology is gaining increasing interest because of high efficiency of wastewater treatment and reuse, data on the anaerobic transformations of retentate are scarce and divergent. The effects of transmembrane pressure (TMP) in microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF) on the pollutant rejection, susceptibility of ceramic membrane to fouling, hydraulic parameters of membrane module, and biogas productivity of retentate were determined. Irrespective of the membrane cut-off and TMP (0.2–0.4 MPa), 97.4 ± 0.7% of COD (chemical oxygen demand), 89.0 ± 4.1% of total nitrogen, and 61.4 ± 0.5% of total phosphorus were removed from municipal wastewater and the permeates can be reused for irrigation. Despite smaller pore diameter, UF membrane was more hydraulically efficient. MF membrane had 1.4–4.6 times higher filtration resistances than UF membrane. In MF and UF, an increase in TMP resulted in an increase in permeate flux. Despite complete retention of suspended solids, strong shearing forces in the membrane installation changed the kinetics of biogas production from retentate in comparison to the kinetics obtained when excess sludge from a secondary clarifier was anaerobically processed. MF retentates had 1.15 to 1.28 times lower cumulative biogas production than the excess sludge. Processing of MF and UF retentates resulted in about 60% elongation of period in which 90% of the cumulative biogas production was achieved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7762199
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77621992020-12-26 Membrane Bioreactor Technology: The Effect of Membrane Filtration on Biogas Potential of the Excess Sludge Zielińska, Magdalena Bernat, Katarzyna Mikucka, Wioleta Membranes (Basel) Article Although the membrane bioreactor technology is gaining increasing interest because of high efficiency of wastewater treatment and reuse, data on the anaerobic transformations of retentate are scarce and divergent. The effects of transmembrane pressure (TMP) in microfiltration (MF) and ultrafiltration (UF) on the pollutant rejection, susceptibility of ceramic membrane to fouling, hydraulic parameters of membrane module, and biogas productivity of retentate were determined. Irrespective of the membrane cut-off and TMP (0.2–0.4 MPa), 97.4 ± 0.7% of COD (chemical oxygen demand), 89.0 ± 4.1% of total nitrogen, and 61.4 ± 0.5% of total phosphorus were removed from municipal wastewater and the permeates can be reused for irrigation. Despite smaller pore diameter, UF membrane was more hydraulically efficient. MF membrane had 1.4–4.6 times higher filtration resistances than UF membrane. In MF and UF, an increase in TMP resulted in an increase in permeate flux. Despite complete retention of suspended solids, strong shearing forces in the membrane installation changed the kinetics of biogas production from retentate in comparison to the kinetics obtained when excess sludge from a secondary clarifier was anaerobically processed. MF retentates had 1.15 to 1.28 times lower cumulative biogas production than the excess sludge. Processing of MF and UF retentates resulted in about 60% elongation of period in which 90% of the cumulative biogas production was achieved. MDPI 2020-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC7762199/ /pubmed/33291247 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes10120397 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zielińska, Magdalena
Bernat, Katarzyna
Mikucka, Wioleta
Membrane Bioreactor Technology: The Effect of Membrane Filtration on Biogas Potential of the Excess Sludge
title Membrane Bioreactor Technology: The Effect of Membrane Filtration on Biogas Potential of the Excess Sludge
title_full Membrane Bioreactor Technology: The Effect of Membrane Filtration on Biogas Potential of the Excess Sludge
title_fullStr Membrane Bioreactor Technology: The Effect of Membrane Filtration on Biogas Potential of the Excess Sludge
title_full_unstemmed Membrane Bioreactor Technology: The Effect of Membrane Filtration on Biogas Potential of the Excess Sludge
title_short Membrane Bioreactor Technology: The Effect of Membrane Filtration on Biogas Potential of the Excess Sludge
title_sort membrane bioreactor technology: the effect of membrane filtration on biogas potential of the excess sludge
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7762199/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33291247
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/membranes10120397
work_keys_str_mv AT zielinskamagdalena membranebioreactortechnologytheeffectofmembranefiltrationonbiogaspotentialoftheexcesssludge
AT bernatkatarzyna membranebioreactortechnologytheeffectofmembranefiltrationonbiogaspotentialoftheexcesssludge
AT mikuckawioleta membranebioreactortechnologytheeffectofmembranefiltrationonbiogaspotentialoftheexcesssludge