Cargando…
Differences in Electromyographic Activities and Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters between General and Developed Insoles with a Toe-Grip Bar
The present study was aimed at comparing the muscle activities and gait parameters between the toe-grip bar insoles and general insoles during walking using randomized crossover design. Twelve healthy men participated in this study. Temporal and spatial gait parameters and electromyography (EMG) res...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7762632/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33381574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6690343 |
_version_ | 1783627851933679616 |
---|---|
author | Abiko, Teppei Murata, Shin Kai, Yoshihiro Nakano, Hideki Matsuo, Dai Kawaguchi, Michio |
author_facet | Abiko, Teppei Murata, Shin Kai, Yoshihiro Nakano, Hideki Matsuo, Dai Kawaguchi, Michio |
author_sort | Abiko, Teppei |
collection | PubMed |
description | The present study was aimed at comparing the muscle activities and gait parameters between the toe-grip bar insoles and general insoles during walking using randomized crossover design. Twelve healthy men participated in this study. Temporal and spatial gait parameters and electromyography (EMG) results were concurrently collected while the subjects walked along an 8 m walkway with the developed and general insoles. Developed insoles provide a three-dimensional mesh structure at the toe portion and a convex bulging structure (toe-grip bar) near the center of the proximal phalanx of the first to fifth toe. The linear mixed model was used to estimate the toe-grip bar insole effect. The results showed that there were no sequence or period effects for any of the examined parameters. During the stance phase, those wearing the developed insoles had significantly higher %IEMG for the TA, GM, and GL than those wearing the general insoles (TA: 5.03%IEMG, p = 0.005; GM: 4.65%IEMG, p = 0.046; and GL: 6.50%IEMG, p = 0.008). During the swing phase, those wearing the developed insoles had significantly higher activity for only the TA compared to those wearing the general insoles (5.54%IEMG, p = 0.011). With respect to gait parameters, those wearing the developed insoles had greater step length (2.81 cm, p = 0.038), longer stance time (0.03 s, p = 0.001), and shorter swing time (−0.02 s, p = 0.003) compared to those wearing the general insoles. The results suggest that walking with toe-grip bar insoles contributes to increased crural muscle activity and step length. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7762632 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77626322020-12-29 Differences in Electromyographic Activities and Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters between General and Developed Insoles with a Toe-Grip Bar Abiko, Teppei Murata, Shin Kai, Yoshihiro Nakano, Hideki Matsuo, Dai Kawaguchi, Michio Biomed Res Int Research Article The present study was aimed at comparing the muscle activities and gait parameters between the toe-grip bar insoles and general insoles during walking using randomized crossover design. Twelve healthy men participated in this study. Temporal and spatial gait parameters and electromyography (EMG) results were concurrently collected while the subjects walked along an 8 m walkway with the developed and general insoles. Developed insoles provide a three-dimensional mesh structure at the toe portion and a convex bulging structure (toe-grip bar) near the center of the proximal phalanx of the first to fifth toe. The linear mixed model was used to estimate the toe-grip bar insole effect. The results showed that there were no sequence or period effects for any of the examined parameters. During the stance phase, those wearing the developed insoles had significantly higher %IEMG for the TA, GM, and GL than those wearing the general insoles (TA: 5.03%IEMG, p = 0.005; GM: 4.65%IEMG, p = 0.046; and GL: 6.50%IEMG, p = 0.008). During the swing phase, those wearing the developed insoles had significantly higher activity for only the TA compared to those wearing the general insoles (5.54%IEMG, p = 0.011). With respect to gait parameters, those wearing the developed insoles had greater step length (2.81 cm, p = 0.038), longer stance time (0.03 s, p = 0.001), and shorter swing time (−0.02 s, p = 0.003) compared to those wearing the general insoles. The results suggest that walking with toe-grip bar insoles contributes to increased crural muscle activity and step length. Hindawi 2020-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7762632/ /pubmed/33381574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6690343 Text en Copyright © 2020 Teppei Abiko et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Abiko, Teppei Murata, Shin Kai, Yoshihiro Nakano, Hideki Matsuo, Dai Kawaguchi, Michio Differences in Electromyographic Activities and Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters between General and Developed Insoles with a Toe-Grip Bar |
title | Differences in Electromyographic Activities and Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters between General and Developed Insoles with a Toe-Grip Bar |
title_full | Differences in Electromyographic Activities and Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters between General and Developed Insoles with a Toe-Grip Bar |
title_fullStr | Differences in Electromyographic Activities and Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters between General and Developed Insoles with a Toe-Grip Bar |
title_full_unstemmed | Differences in Electromyographic Activities and Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters between General and Developed Insoles with a Toe-Grip Bar |
title_short | Differences in Electromyographic Activities and Spatiotemporal Gait Parameters between General and Developed Insoles with a Toe-Grip Bar |
title_sort | differences in electromyographic activities and spatiotemporal gait parameters between general and developed insoles with a toe-grip bar |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7762632/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33381574 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/6690343 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT abikoteppei differencesinelectromyographicactivitiesandspatiotemporalgaitparametersbetweengeneralanddevelopedinsoleswithatoegripbar AT muratashin differencesinelectromyographicactivitiesandspatiotemporalgaitparametersbetweengeneralanddevelopedinsoleswithatoegripbar AT kaiyoshihiro differencesinelectromyographicactivitiesandspatiotemporalgaitparametersbetweengeneralanddevelopedinsoleswithatoegripbar AT nakanohideki differencesinelectromyographicactivitiesandspatiotemporalgaitparametersbetweengeneralanddevelopedinsoleswithatoegripbar AT matsuodai differencesinelectromyographicactivitiesandspatiotemporalgaitparametersbetweengeneralanddevelopedinsoleswithatoegripbar AT kawaguchimichio differencesinelectromyographicactivitiesandspatiotemporalgaitparametersbetweengeneralanddevelopedinsoleswithatoegripbar |