Cargando…

Can self-management programmes change healthcare utilisation in COPD?: A systematic review and framework analysis

OBJECTIVE: The study aims to evaluate the ability of self-management programmes to change the healthcare-seeking behaviours of people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and any associations between programme design and outcomes. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature returned...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Smalley, Katelyn R., Aufegger, Lisa, Flott, Kelsey, Mayer, Erik K., Darzi, Ara
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7762718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32912809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.015
_version_ 1783627872595869696
author Smalley, Katelyn R.
Aufegger, Lisa
Flott, Kelsey
Mayer, Erik K.
Darzi, Ara
author_facet Smalley, Katelyn R.
Aufegger, Lisa
Flott, Kelsey
Mayer, Erik K.
Darzi, Ara
author_sort Smalley, Katelyn R.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The study aims to evaluate the ability of self-management programmes to change the healthcare-seeking behaviours of people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and any associations between programme design and outcomes. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature returned randomised controlled trials of SMPs for COPD. Change in healthcare utilisation was the primary outcome measure. Programme design was analysed using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). RESULTS: A total of 26 papers described 19 SMPs. The most common utilisation outcome was hospitalisation (n = 22). Of these, 5 showed a significant decrease. Two theoretical domains were evidenced in all programmes: skills and behavioural regulation. All programmes evidenced at least 5 domains. However, there was no clear association between TDF domains and utilisation. Overall, study quality was moderate to poor. CONCLUSION: This review highlights the need for more alignment in the goals, design, and evaluation of SMPs. Specifically, the TDF could be used to guide programme design and evaluation in future. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Practices have a reasonable expectation that interventions they adopt will provide patient benefit and value for money. Better design and reporting of SMP trials would address their ability to do so.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7762718
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77627182021-01-01 Can self-management programmes change healthcare utilisation in COPD?: A systematic review and framework analysis Smalley, Katelyn R. Aufegger, Lisa Flott, Kelsey Mayer, Erik K. Darzi, Ara Patient Educ Couns Review Article OBJECTIVE: The study aims to evaluate the ability of self-management programmes to change the healthcare-seeking behaviours of people with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and any associations between programme design and outcomes. METHODS: A systematic search of the literature returned randomised controlled trials of SMPs for COPD. Change in healthcare utilisation was the primary outcome measure. Programme design was analysed using the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF). RESULTS: A total of 26 papers described 19 SMPs. The most common utilisation outcome was hospitalisation (n = 22). Of these, 5 showed a significant decrease. Two theoretical domains were evidenced in all programmes: skills and behavioural regulation. All programmes evidenced at least 5 domains. However, there was no clear association between TDF domains and utilisation. Overall, study quality was moderate to poor. CONCLUSION: This review highlights the need for more alignment in the goals, design, and evaluation of SMPs. Specifically, the TDF could be used to guide programme design and evaluation in future. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Practices have a reasonable expectation that interventions they adopt will provide patient benefit and value for money. Better design and reporting of SMP trials would address their ability to do so. Elsevier 2021-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7762718/ /pubmed/32912809 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.015 Text en © 2020 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review Article
Smalley, Katelyn R.
Aufegger, Lisa
Flott, Kelsey
Mayer, Erik K.
Darzi, Ara
Can self-management programmes change healthcare utilisation in COPD?: A systematic review and framework analysis
title Can self-management programmes change healthcare utilisation in COPD?: A systematic review and framework analysis
title_full Can self-management programmes change healthcare utilisation in COPD?: A systematic review and framework analysis
title_fullStr Can self-management programmes change healthcare utilisation in COPD?: A systematic review and framework analysis
title_full_unstemmed Can self-management programmes change healthcare utilisation in COPD?: A systematic review and framework analysis
title_short Can self-management programmes change healthcare utilisation in COPD?: A systematic review and framework analysis
title_sort can self-management programmes change healthcare utilisation in copd?: a systematic review and framework analysis
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7762718/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32912809
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pec.2020.08.015
work_keys_str_mv AT smalleykatelynr canselfmanagementprogrammeschangehealthcareutilisationincopdasystematicreviewandframeworkanalysis
AT aufeggerlisa canselfmanagementprogrammeschangehealthcareutilisationincopdasystematicreviewandframeworkanalysis
AT flottkelsey canselfmanagementprogrammeschangehealthcareutilisationincopdasystematicreviewandframeworkanalysis
AT mayererikk canselfmanagementprogrammeschangehealthcareutilisationincopdasystematicreviewandframeworkanalysis
AT darziara canselfmanagementprogrammeschangehealthcareutilisationincopdasystematicreviewandframeworkanalysis