Cargando…
Comparison of Soil Total Nitrogen Content Prediction Models Based on Vis-NIR Spectroscopy
Visible-near-infrared spectrum (Vis-NIR) spectroscopy technology is one of the most important methods for non-destructive and rapid detection of soil total nitrogen (STN) content. In order to find a practical way to build STN content prediction model, three conventional machine learning methods and...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7763030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33321833 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20247078 |
_version_ | 1783627920395206656 |
---|---|
author | Wang, Yueting Li, Minzan Ji, Ronghua Wang, Minjuan Zheng, Lihua |
author_facet | Wang, Yueting Li, Minzan Ji, Ronghua Wang, Minjuan Zheng, Lihua |
author_sort | Wang, Yueting |
collection | PubMed |
description | Visible-near-infrared spectrum (Vis-NIR) spectroscopy technology is one of the most important methods for non-destructive and rapid detection of soil total nitrogen (STN) content. In order to find a practical way to build STN content prediction model, three conventional machine learning methods and one deep learning approach are investigated and their predictive performances are compared and analyzed by using a public dataset called LUCAS Soil (19,019 samples). The three conventional machine learning methods include ordinary least square estimation (OLSE), random forest (RF), and extreme learning machine (ELM), while for the deep learning method, three different structures of convolutional neural network (CNN) incorporated Inception module are constructed and investigated. In order to clarify effectiveness of different pre-treatments on predicting STN content, the three conventional machine learning methods are combined with four pre-processing approaches (including baseline correction, smoothing, dimensional reduction, and feature selection) are investigated, compared, and analyzed. The results indicate that the baseline-corrected and smoothed ELM model reaches practical precision (coefficient of determination (R(2)) = 0.89, root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) = 1.60 g/kg, and residual prediction deviation (RPD) = 2.34). While among three different structured CNN models, the one with more 1 × 1 convolutions preforms better (R(2) = 0.93; RMSEP = 0.95 g/kg; and RPD = 3.85 in optimal case). In addition, in order to evaluate the influence of data set characteristics on the model, the LUCAS data set was divided into different data subsets according to dataset size, organic carbon (OC) content and countries, and the results show that the deep learning method is more effective and practical than conventional machine learning methods and, on the premise of enough data samples, it can be used to build a robust STN content prediction model with high accuracy for the same type of soil with similar agricultural treatment. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7763030 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77630302020-12-27 Comparison of Soil Total Nitrogen Content Prediction Models Based on Vis-NIR Spectroscopy Wang, Yueting Li, Minzan Ji, Ronghua Wang, Minjuan Zheng, Lihua Sensors (Basel) Article Visible-near-infrared spectrum (Vis-NIR) spectroscopy technology is one of the most important methods for non-destructive and rapid detection of soil total nitrogen (STN) content. In order to find a practical way to build STN content prediction model, three conventional machine learning methods and one deep learning approach are investigated and their predictive performances are compared and analyzed by using a public dataset called LUCAS Soil (19,019 samples). The three conventional machine learning methods include ordinary least square estimation (OLSE), random forest (RF), and extreme learning machine (ELM), while for the deep learning method, three different structures of convolutional neural network (CNN) incorporated Inception module are constructed and investigated. In order to clarify effectiveness of different pre-treatments on predicting STN content, the three conventional machine learning methods are combined with four pre-processing approaches (including baseline correction, smoothing, dimensional reduction, and feature selection) are investigated, compared, and analyzed. The results indicate that the baseline-corrected and smoothed ELM model reaches practical precision (coefficient of determination (R(2)) = 0.89, root mean square error of prediction (RMSEP) = 1.60 g/kg, and residual prediction deviation (RPD) = 2.34). While among three different structured CNN models, the one with more 1 × 1 convolutions preforms better (R(2) = 0.93; RMSEP = 0.95 g/kg; and RPD = 3.85 in optimal case). In addition, in order to evaluate the influence of data set characteristics on the model, the LUCAS data set was divided into different data subsets according to dataset size, organic carbon (OC) content and countries, and the results show that the deep learning method is more effective and practical than conventional machine learning methods and, on the premise of enough data samples, it can be used to build a robust STN content prediction model with high accuracy for the same type of soil with similar agricultural treatment. MDPI 2020-12-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7763030/ /pubmed/33321833 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20247078 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wang, Yueting Li, Minzan Ji, Ronghua Wang, Minjuan Zheng, Lihua Comparison of Soil Total Nitrogen Content Prediction Models Based on Vis-NIR Spectroscopy |
title | Comparison of Soil Total Nitrogen Content Prediction Models Based on Vis-NIR Spectroscopy |
title_full | Comparison of Soil Total Nitrogen Content Prediction Models Based on Vis-NIR Spectroscopy |
title_fullStr | Comparison of Soil Total Nitrogen Content Prediction Models Based on Vis-NIR Spectroscopy |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of Soil Total Nitrogen Content Prediction Models Based on Vis-NIR Spectroscopy |
title_short | Comparison of Soil Total Nitrogen Content Prediction Models Based on Vis-NIR Spectroscopy |
title_sort | comparison of soil total nitrogen content prediction models based on vis-nir spectroscopy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7763030/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33321833 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s20247078 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wangyueting comparisonofsoiltotalnitrogencontentpredictionmodelsbasedonvisnirspectroscopy AT liminzan comparisonofsoiltotalnitrogencontentpredictionmodelsbasedonvisnirspectroscopy AT jironghua comparisonofsoiltotalnitrogencontentpredictionmodelsbasedonvisnirspectroscopy AT wangminjuan comparisonofsoiltotalnitrogencontentpredictionmodelsbasedonvisnirspectroscopy AT zhenglihua comparisonofsoiltotalnitrogencontentpredictionmodelsbasedonvisnirspectroscopy |