Cargando…

Assessment of a Screening Questionnaire to Identify Exposure to Lead in Pregnant Women

Lead readily crosses the placenta and displays adverse effects on birth outcomes and neurodevelopment. Systematic identification of the risk of exposure during pregnancy is essential but rarely performed, probably due to hospital staff’s workload and their lack of awareness. We aimed to evaluate the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Coiplet, Eléna, Freuchet, Marine, Sunyach, Claire, Mancini, Julien, Perrin, Jeanne, Courbiere, Blandine, Heckenroth, Hélène, Pissier, Christel, Hamdaoui, Naima, Bretelle, Florence
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7763227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33321747
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249220
_version_ 1783627968014188544
author Coiplet, Eléna
Freuchet, Marine
Sunyach, Claire
Mancini, Julien
Perrin, Jeanne
Courbiere, Blandine
Heckenroth, Hélène
Pissier, Christel
Hamdaoui, Naima
Bretelle, Florence
author_facet Coiplet, Eléna
Freuchet, Marine
Sunyach, Claire
Mancini, Julien
Perrin, Jeanne
Courbiere, Blandine
Heckenroth, Hélène
Pissier, Christel
Hamdaoui, Naima
Bretelle, Florence
author_sort Coiplet, Eléna
collection PubMed
description Lead readily crosses the placenta and displays adverse effects on birth outcomes and neurodevelopment. Systematic identification of the risk of exposure during pregnancy is essential but rarely performed, probably due to hospital staff’s workload and their lack of awareness. We aimed to evaluate the relevance of a questionnaire to screen pregnant women for lead exposure. A cross-sectional, multicentre study was carried out on a population of 792 pregnant women from February 2018 to May 2020. A total of 596 women had a blood lead test: 68.5% had blood lead levels below 10 μg/L. The estimated prevalence above 25 µg/L was 4% (95% confidence interval (CI) [2.6–5.9]) and 1.3% had levels above 50 µg/L (95% CI [0.6–2.6]). Multivariate analysis showed that three risk factors significantly increased the probability of blood lead levels above 25 µg/L: the use of traditional cosmetics (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 3.90; 95% CI [1.65–9.21]; p = 0.002), degraded old housing (aOR: 2.67; 95% CI [1.19–6.038]; p = 0.018), and (marginally) eating bread more than twice a day (aOR: 2.40; 95% CI [0.96–6.11]; p = 0.060). Our study reveals that a three-question tool can be used to quickly screen for the risk of lead exposure in our population and to trigger lead blood tests and special vigilance during pregnancy follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7763227
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77632272020-12-27 Assessment of a Screening Questionnaire to Identify Exposure to Lead in Pregnant Women Coiplet, Eléna Freuchet, Marine Sunyach, Claire Mancini, Julien Perrin, Jeanne Courbiere, Blandine Heckenroth, Hélène Pissier, Christel Hamdaoui, Naima Bretelle, Florence Int J Environ Res Public Health Article Lead readily crosses the placenta and displays adverse effects on birth outcomes and neurodevelopment. Systematic identification of the risk of exposure during pregnancy is essential but rarely performed, probably due to hospital staff’s workload and their lack of awareness. We aimed to evaluate the relevance of a questionnaire to screen pregnant women for lead exposure. A cross-sectional, multicentre study was carried out on a population of 792 pregnant women from February 2018 to May 2020. A total of 596 women had a blood lead test: 68.5% had blood lead levels below 10 μg/L. The estimated prevalence above 25 µg/L was 4% (95% confidence interval (CI) [2.6–5.9]) and 1.3% had levels above 50 µg/L (95% CI [0.6–2.6]). Multivariate analysis showed that three risk factors significantly increased the probability of blood lead levels above 25 µg/L: the use of traditional cosmetics (adjusted odds ratio [aOR]: 3.90; 95% CI [1.65–9.21]; p = 0.002), degraded old housing (aOR: 2.67; 95% CI [1.19–6.038]; p = 0.018), and (marginally) eating bread more than twice a day (aOR: 2.40; 95% CI [0.96–6.11]; p = 0.060). Our study reveals that a three-question tool can be used to quickly screen for the risk of lead exposure in our population and to trigger lead blood tests and special vigilance during pregnancy follow-up. MDPI 2020-12-10 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7763227/ /pubmed/33321747 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249220 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Coiplet, Eléna
Freuchet, Marine
Sunyach, Claire
Mancini, Julien
Perrin, Jeanne
Courbiere, Blandine
Heckenroth, Hélène
Pissier, Christel
Hamdaoui, Naima
Bretelle, Florence
Assessment of a Screening Questionnaire to Identify Exposure to Lead in Pregnant Women
title Assessment of a Screening Questionnaire to Identify Exposure to Lead in Pregnant Women
title_full Assessment of a Screening Questionnaire to Identify Exposure to Lead in Pregnant Women
title_fullStr Assessment of a Screening Questionnaire to Identify Exposure to Lead in Pregnant Women
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of a Screening Questionnaire to Identify Exposure to Lead in Pregnant Women
title_short Assessment of a Screening Questionnaire to Identify Exposure to Lead in Pregnant Women
title_sort assessment of a screening questionnaire to identify exposure to lead in pregnant women
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7763227/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33321747
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249220
work_keys_str_mv AT coipletelena assessmentofascreeningquestionnairetoidentifyexposuretoleadinpregnantwomen
AT freuchetmarine assessmentofascreeningquestionnairetoidentifyexposuretoleadinpregnantwomen
AT sunyachclaire assessmentofascreeningquestionnairetoidentifyexposuretoleadinpregnantwomen
AT mancinijulien assessmentofascreeningquestionnairetoidentifyexposuretoleadinpregnantwomen
AT perrinjeanne assessmentofascreeningquestionnairetoidentifyexposuretoleadinpregnantwomen
AT courbiereblandine assessmentofascreeningquestionnairetoidentifyexposuretoleadinpregnantwomen
AT heckenrothhelene assessmentofascreeningquestionnairetoidentifyexposuretoleadinpregnantwomen
AT pissierchristel assessmentofascreeningquestionnairetoidentifyexposuretoleadinpregnantwomen
AT hamdaouinaima assessmentofascreeningquestionnairetoidentifyexposuretoleadinpregnantwomen
AT bretelleflorence assessmentofascreeningquestionnairetoidentifyexposuretoleadinpregnantwomen