Cargando…
Long‐Term Results After Drug‐Eluting Versus Bare‐Metal Stent Implantation in Saphenous Vein Grafts: Randomized Controlled Trial
BACKGROUND: Efficacy data on drug‐eluting stents (DES) versus bare‐metal stents (BMS) in saphenous vein grafts are controversial. We aimed to compare DES with BMS among patients undergoing saphenous vein grafts intervention regarding long‐term outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this multinational tria...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7763393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33032485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.017434 |
_version_ | 1783628007951302656 |
---|---|
author | Fahrni, Gregor Farah, Ahmed Engstrøm, Thomas Galatius, Søren Eberli, Franz Rickenbacher, Peter Conen, David Mueller, Christian Pfister, Otmar Twerenbold, Raphael Coslovsky, Michael Cattaneo, Marco Kaiser, Christoph Mangner, Norman Schuler, Gerhard Pfisterer, Matthias Möbius‐Winkler, Sven Jeger, Raban V. |
author_facet | Fahrni, Gregor Farah, Ahmed Engstrøm, Thomas Galatius, Søren Eberli, Franz Rickenbacher, Peter Conen, David Mueller, Christian Pfister, Otmar Twerenbold, Raphael Coslovsky, Michael Cattaneo, Marco Kaiser, Christoph Mangner, Norman Schuler, Gerhard Pfisterer, Matthias Möbius‐Winkler, Sven Jeger, Raban V. |
author_sort | Fahrni, Gregor |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Efficacy data on drug‐eluting stents (DES) versus bare‐metal stents (BMS) in saphenous vein grafts are controversial. We aimed to compare DES with BMS among patients undergoing saphenous vein grafts intervention regarding long‐term outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this multinational trial, patients were randomized to paclitaxel‐eluting or BMS. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target‐vessel revascularization at 1 year. Secondary end points included major adverse cardiac events and its individual components at 5‐year follow‐up. One hundred seventy‐three patients were included in the trial (89 DES versus 84 BMS). One‐year major adverse cardiac event rates were lower in DES compared with BMS (2.2% versus 16.0%, hazard ratio, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.03–0.64, P=0.01), which was mainly driven by a reduction of subsequent myocardial infarctions and need for target‐vessel revascularization. Five‐year major adverse cardiac event rates remained lower in the DES compared with the BMS arm (35.5% versus 56.1%, hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.23–0.68, P<0.001). A landmark‐analysis from 1 to 5 years revealed a persistent benefit of DES over BMS (hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13–0.74, P=0.007) in terms of target‐vessel revascularization. More patients in the BMS group underwent multiple target‐vessel revascularization procedures throughout the study period compared with the DES group (DES 1.1% [n=1] versus BMS 9.5% [n=8], P=0.013). Enrollment was stopped before the target sample size of 240 patients was reached. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized controlled trial with prospective long‐term follow‐up of up to 5 years, DES showed a better efficacy than BMS with sustained benefits over time. DES may be the preferred strategy in this patient population. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00595647. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7763393 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77633932020-12-28 Long‐Term Results After Drug‐Eluting Versus Bare‐Metal Stent Implantation in Saphenous Vein Grafts: Randomized Controlled Trial Fahrni, Gregor Farah, Ahmed Engstrøm, Thomas Galatius, Søren Eberli, Franz Rickenbacher, Peter Conen, David Mueller, Christian Pfister, Otmar Twerenbold, Raphael Coslovsky, Michael Cattaneo, Marco Kaiser, Christoph Mangner, Norman Schuler, Gerhard Pfisterer, Matthias Möbius‐Winkler, Sven Jeger, Raban V. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Efficacy data on drug‐eluting stents (DES) versus bare‐metal stents (BMS) in saphenous vein grafts are controversial. We aimed to compare DES with BMS among patients undergoing saphenous vein grafts intervention regarding long‐term outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this multinational trial, patients were randomized to paclitaxel‐eluting or BMS. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target‐vessel revascularization at 1 year. Secondary end points included major adverse cardiac events and its individual components at 5‐year follow‐up. One hundred seventy‐three patients were included in the trial (89 DES versus 84 BMS). One‐year major adverse cardiac event rates were lower in DES compared with BMS (2.2% versus 16.0%, hazard ratio, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.03–0.64, P=0.01), which was mainly driven by a reduction of subsequent myocardial infarctions and need for target‐vessel revascularization. Five‐year major adverse cardiac event rates remained lower in the DES compared with the BMS arm (35.5% versus 56.1%, hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.23–0.68, P<0.001). A landmark‐analysis from 1 to 5 years revealed a persistent benefit of DES over BMS (hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13–0.74, P=0.007) in terms of target‐vessel revascularization. More patients in the BMS group underwent multiple target‐vessel revascularization procedures throughout the study period compared with the DES group (DES 1.1% [n=1] versus BMS 9.5% [n=8], P=0.013). Enrollment was stopped before the target sample size of 240 patients was reached. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized controlled trial with prospective long‐term follow‐up of up to 5 years, DES showed a better efficacy than BMS with sustained benefits over time. DES may be the preferred strategy in this patient population. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00595647. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7763393/ /pubmed/33032485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.017434 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Fahrni, Gregor Farah, Ahmed Engstrøm, Thomas Galatius, Søren Eberli, Franz Rickenbacher, Peter Conen, David Mueller, Christian Pfister, Otmar Twerenbold, Raphael Coslovsky, Michael Cattaneo, Marco Kaiser, Christoph Mangner, Norman Schuler, Gerhard Pfisterer, Matthias Möbius‐Winkler, Sven Jeger, Raban V. Long‐Term Results After Drug‐Eluting Versus Bare‐Metal Stent Implantation in Saphenous Vein Grafts: Randomized Controlled Trial |
title | Long‐Term Results After Drug‐Eluting Versus Bare‐Metal Stent Implantation in Saphenous Vein Grafts: Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full | Long‐Term Results After Drug‐Eluting Versus Bare‐Metal Stent Implantation in Saphenous Vein Grafts: Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_fullStr | Long‐Term Results After Drug‐Eluting Versus Bare‐Metal Stent Implantation in Saphenous Vein Grafts: Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Long‐Term Results After Drug‐Eluting Versus Bare‐Metal Stent Implantation in Saphenous Vein Grafts: Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_short | Long‐Term Results After Drug‐Eluting Versus Bare‐Metal Stent Implantation in Saphenous Vein Grafts: Randomized Controlled Trial |
title_sort | long‐term results after drug‐eluting versus bare‐metal stent implantation in saphenous vein grafts: randomized controlled trial |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7763393/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33032485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.017434 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fahrnigregor longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT farahahmed longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT engstrømthomas longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT galatiussøren longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT eberlifranz longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT rickenbacherpeter longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT conendavid longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT muellerchristian longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pfisterotmar longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT twerenboldraphael longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT coslovskymichael longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT cattaneomarco longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT kaiserchristoph longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mangnernorman longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT schulergerhard longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT pfisterermatthias longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT mobiuswinklersven longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT jegerrabanv longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial AT longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial |