Cargando…

Long‐Term Results After Drug‐Eluting Versus Bare‐Metal Stent Implantation in Saphenous Vein Grafts: Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND: Efficacy data on drug‐eluting stents (DES) versus bare‐metal stents (BMS) in saphenous vein grafts are controversial. We aimed to compare DES with BMS among patients undergoing saphenous vein grafts intervention regarding long‐term outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this multinational tria...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fahrni, Gregor, Farah, Ahmed, Engstrøm, Thomas, Galatius, Søren, Eberli, Franz, Rickenbacher, Peter, Conen, David, Mueller, Christian, Pfister, Otmar, Twerenbold, Raphael, Coslovsky, Michael, Cattaneo, Marco, Kaiser, Christoph, Mangner, Norman, Schuler, Gerhard, Pfisterer, Matthias, Möbius‐Winkler, Sven, Jeger, Raban V.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7763393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33032485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.017434
_version_ 1783628007951302656
author Fahrni, Gregor
Farah, Ahmed
Engstrøm, Thomas
Galatius, Søren
Eberli, Franz
Rickenbacher, Peter
Conen, David
Mueller, Christian
Pfister, Otmar
Twerenbold, Raphael
Coslovsky, Michael
Cattaneo, Marco
Kaiser, Christoph
Mangner, Norman
Schuler, Gerhard
Pfisterer, Matthias
Möbius‐Winkler, Sven
Jeger, Raban V.
author_facet Fahrni, Gregor
Farah, Ahmed
Engstrøm, Thomas
Galatius, Søren
Eberli, Franz
Rickenbacher, Peter
Conen, David
Mueller, Christian
Pfister, Otmar
Twerenbold, Raphael
Coslovsky, Michael
Cattaneo, Marco
Kaiser, Christoph
Mangner, Norman
Schuler, Gerhard
Pfisterer, Matthias
Möbius‐Winkler, Sven
Jeger, Raban V.
author_sort Fahrni, Gregor
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Efficacy data on drug‐eluting stents (DES) versus bare‐metal stents (BMS) in saphenous vein grafts are controversial. We aimed to compare DES with BMS among patients undergoing saphenous vein grafts intervention regarding long‐term outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this multinational trial, patients were randomized to paclitaxel‐eluting or BMS. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target‐vessel revascularization at 1 year. Secondary end points included major adverse cardiac events and its individual components at 5‐year follow‐up. One hundred seventy‐three patients were included in the trial (89 DES versus 84 BMS). One‐year major adverse cardiac event rates were lower in DES compared with BMS (2.2% versus 16.0%, hazard ratio, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.03–0.64, P=0.01), which was mainly driven by a reduction of subsequent myocardial infarctions and need for target‐vessel revascularization. Five‐year major adverse cardiac event rates remained lower in the DES compared with the BMS arm (35.5% versus 56.1%, hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.23–0.68, P<0.001). A landmark‐analysis from 1 to 5 years revealed a persistent benefit of DES over BMS (hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13–0.74, P=0.007) in terms of target‐vessel revascularization. More patients in the BMS group underwent multiple target‐vessel revascularization procedures throughout the study period compared with the DES group (DES 1.1% [n=1] versus BMS 9.5% [n=8], P=0.013). Enrollment was stopped before the target sample size of 240 patients was reached. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized controlled trial with prospective long‐term follow‐up of up to 5 years, DES showed a better efficacy than BMS with sustained benefits over time. DES may be the preferred strategy in this patient population. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clini​caltr​ials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00595647.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7763393
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77633932020-12-28 Long‐Term Results After Drug‐Eluting Versus Bare‐Metal Stent Implantation in Saphenous Vein Grafts: Randomized Controlled Trial Fahrni, Gregor Farah, Ahmed Engstrøm, Thomas Galatius, Søren Eberli, Franz Rickenbacher, Peter Conen, David Mueller, Christian Pfister, Otmar Twerenbold, Raphael Coslovsky, Michael Cattaneo, Marco Kaiser, Christoph Mangner, Norman Schuler, Gerhard Pfisterer, Matthias Möbius‐Winkler, Sven Jeger, Raban V. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: Efficacy data on drug‐eluting stents (DES) versus bare‐metal stents (BMS) in saphenous vein grafts are controversial. We aimed to compare DES with BMS among patients undergoing saphenous vein grafts intervention regarding long‐term outcome. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this multinational trial, patients were randomized to paclitaxel‐eluting or BMS. The primary end point was major adverse cardiac events (cardiac death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, and target‐vessel revascularization at 1 year. Secondary end points included major adverse cardiac events and its individual components at 5‐year follow‐up. One hundred seventy‐three patients were included in the trial (89 DES versus 84 BMS). One‐year major adverse cardiac event rates were lower in DES compared with BMS (2.2% versus 16.0%, hazard ratio, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.03–0.64, P=0.01), which was mainly driven by a reduction of subsequent myocardial infarctions and need for target‐vessel revascularization. Five‐year major adverse cardiac event rates remained lower in the DES compared with the BMS arm (35.5% versus 56.1%, hazard ratio, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.23–0.68, P<0.001). A landmark‐analysis from 1 to 5 years revealed a persistent benefit of DES over BMS (hazard ratio, 0.33; 95% CI, 0.13–0.74, P=0.007) in terms of target‐vessel revascularization. More patients in the BMS group underwent multiple target‐vessel revascularization procedures throughout the study period compared with the DES group (DES 1.1% [n=1] versus BMS 9.5% [n=8], P=0.013). Enrollment was stopped before the target sample size of 240 patients was reached. CONCLUSIONS: In this randomized controlled trial with prospective long‐term follow‐up of up to 5 years, DES showed a better efficacy than BMS with sustained benefits over time. DES may be the preferred strategy in this patient population. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clini​caltr​ials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT00595647. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7763393/ /pubmed/33032485 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.017434 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ License, which permits use and distribution in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, the use is non‐commercial and no modifications or adaptations are made.
spellingShingle Original Research
Fahrni, Gregor
Farah, Ahmed
Engstrøm, Thomas
Galatius, Søren
Eberli, Franz
Rickenbacher, Peter
Conen, David
Mueller, Christian
Pfister, Otmar
Twerenbold, Raphael
Coslovsky, Michael
Cattaneo, Marco
Kaiser, Christoph
Mangner, Norman
Schuler, Gerhard
Pfisterer, Matthias
Möbius‐Winkler, Sven
Jeger, Raban V.
Long‐Term Results After Drug‐Eluting Versus Bare‐Metal Stent Implantation in Saphenous Vein Grafts: Randomized Controlled Trial
title Long‐Term Results After Drug‐Eluting Versus Bare‐Metal Stent Implantation in Saphenous Vein Grafts: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Long‐Term Results After Drug‐Eluting Versus Bare‐Metal Stent Implantation in Saphenous Vein Grafts: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Long‐Term Results After Drug‐Eluting Versus Bare‐Metal Stent Implantation in Saphenous Vein Grafts: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Long‐Term Results After Drug‐Eluting Versus Bare‐Metal Stent Implantation in Saphenous Vein Grafts: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Long‐Term Results After Drug‐Eluting Versus Bare‐Metal Stent Implantation in Saphenous Vein Grafts: Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort long‐term results after drug‐eluting versus bare‐metal stent implantation in saphenous vein grafts: randomized controlled trial
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7763393/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33032485
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.017434
work_keys_str_mv AT fahrnigregor longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT farahahmed longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT engstrømthomas longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT galatiussøren longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT eberlifranz longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT rickenbacherpeter longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT conendavid longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT muellerchristian longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pfisterotmar longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT twerenboldraphael longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT coslovskymichael longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT cattaneomarco longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kaiserchristoph longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mangnernorman longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT schulergerhard longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT pfisterermatthias longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT mobiuswinklersven longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT jegerrabanv longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT longtermresultsafterdrugelutingversusbaremetalstentimplantationinsaphenousveingraftsrandomizedcontrolledtrial