Cargando…

Recognizing Cardiovascular Risk After Preeclampsia: The P4 Study

BACKGROUND: There is increased risk of hypertension, early cardiovascular disease, and premature mortality in women who have had preeclampsia. This study was undertaken to determine the upper limit of normal blood pressure (BP) 6 months postpartum and the frequency of women with prior preeclampsia w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brown, Mark A., Roberts, Lynne, Hoffman, Anna, Henry, Amanda, Mangos, George, O’Sullivan, Anthony, Pettit, Franziska, Youssef, George, Xu, Lily, Davis, Gregory K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7763721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33170079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.018604
_version_ 1783628085534392320
author Brown, Mark A.
Roberts, Lynne
Hoffman, Anna
Henry, Amanda
Mangos, George
O’Sullivan, Anthony
Pettit, Franziska
Youssef, George
Xu, Lily
Davis, Gregory K.
author_facet Brown, Mark A.
Roberts, Lynne
Hoffman, Anna
Henry, Amanda
Mangos, George
O’Sullivan, Anthony
Pettit, Franziska
Youssef, George
Xu, Lily
Davis, Gregory K.
author_sort Brown, Mark A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There is increased risk of hypertension, early cardiovascular disease, and premature mortality in women who have had preeclampsia. This study was undertaken to determine the upper limit of normal blood pressure (BP) 6 months postpartum and the frequency of women with prior preeclampsia who had BP above these limits, as part of the P4 (Post‐Partum Physiology, Psychology and Pediatric) follow‐up study. METHODS AND RESULTS: BP was measured by sphygmomanometer, 24‐hour ambulatory BP monitoring, and non‐invasive central BP at 6 months postpartum in 302 women who had normotensive pregnancy and 90 who had preeclampsia. The upper limit of normal BP (mean+2 SD) for women with normotensive pregnancy was 122/79 mm Hg for routine BP, 115/81 mm Hg for central BP, and 121/78 mm Hg for 24‐hour ambulatory BP monitoring. Traditional normal values detected only 3% of women who had preeclampsia as having high BP 6 months postpartum whereas these new values detected between 13% and 19%. Women with preeclampsia had greater body mass index (27.8 versus 25.0, P<0.001) and left ventricular wall thickness but similar augmentation index. They also had lower high‐density lipoprotein (59±15 versus 65±16 mg/dL, P=0.002), higher triglycerides (77±51 versus 61±35 mg/dL, P=0.005), and higher homeostatic model assessment score (2.1±1.8 versus 1.3±1.9, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians wishing to detect high BP in these women should be aware of the lower than usual upper limit of normal for this young cohort and where possible should use 24‐hour ambulatory BP monitoring to detect these changes. This may define a subgroup of women who had preeclampsia for whom targeted BP lowering therapy would be successful. REGISTRATION: URL: https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=365295&isReview=true; Unique identifier: ACTRN12613001260718.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7763721
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77637212020-12-28 Recognizing Cardiovascular Risk After Preeclampsia: The P4 Study Brown, Mark A. Roberts, Lynne Hoffman, Anna Henry, Amanda Mangos, George O’Sullivan, Anthony Pettit, Franziska Youssef, George Xu, Lily Davis, Gregory K. J Am Heart Assoc Original Research BACKGROUND: There is increased risk of hypertension, early cardiovascular disease, and premature mortality in women who have had preeclampsia. This study was undertaken to determine the upper limit of normal blood pressure (BP) 6 months postpartum and the frequency of women with prior preeclampsia who had BP above these limits, as part of the P4 (Post‐Partum Physiology, Psychology and Pediatric) follow‐up study. METHODS AND RESULTS: BP was measured by sphygmomanometer, 24‐hour ambulatory BP monitoring, and non‐invasive central BP at 6 months postpartum in 302 women who had normotensive pregnancy and 90 who had preeclampsia. The upper limit of normal BP (mean+2 SD) for women with normotensive pregnancy was 122/79 mm Hg for routine BP, 115/81 mm Hg for central BP, and 121/78 mm Hg for 24‐hour ambulatory BP monitoring. Traditional normal values detected only 3% of women who had preeclampsia as having high BP 6 months postpartum whereas these new values detected between 13% and 19%. Women with preeclampsia had greater body mass index (27.8 versus 25.0, P<0.001) and left ventricular wall thickness but similar augmentation index. They also had lower high‐density lipoprotein (59±15 versus 65±16 mg/dL, P=0.002), higher triglycerides (77±51 versus 61±35 mg/dL, P=0.005), and higher homeostatic model assessment score (2.1±1.8 versus 1.3±1.9, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Clinicians wishing to detect high BP in these women should be aware of the lower than usual upper limit of normal for this young cohort and where possible should use 24‐hour ambulatory BP monitoring to detect these changes. This may define a subgroup of women who had preeclampsia for whom targeted BP lowering therapy would be successful. REGISTRATION: URL: https://anzctr.org.au/Trial/Registration/TrialReview.aspx?id=365295&isReview=true; Unique identifier: ACTRN12613001260718. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-11-10 /pmc/articles/PMC7763721/ /pubmed/33170079 http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.018604 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.
spellingShingle Original Research
Brown, Mark A.
Roberts, Lynne
Hoffman, Anna
Henry, Amanda
Mangos, George
O’Sullivan, Anthony
Pettit, Franziska
Youssef, George
Xu, Lily
Davis, Gregory K.
Recognizing Cardiovascular Risk After Preeclampsia: The P4 Study
title Recognizing Cardiovascular Risk After Preeclampsia: The P4 Study
title_full Recognizing Cardiovascular Risk After Preeclampsia: The P4 Study
title_fullStr Recognizing Cardiovascular Risk After Preeclampsia: The P4 Study
title_full_unstemmed Recognizing Cardiovascular Risk After Preeclampsia: The P4 Study
title_short Recognizing Cardiovascular Risk After Preeclampsia: The P4 Study
title_sort recognizing cardiovascular risk after preeclampsia: the p4 study
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7763721/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33170079
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.018604
work_keys_str_mv AT brownmarka recognizingcardiovascularriskafterpreeclampsiathep4study
AT robertslynne recognizingcardiovascularriskafterpreeclampsiathep4study
AT hoffmananna recognizingcardiovascularriskafterpreeclampsiathep4study
AT henryamanda recognizingcardiovascularriskafterpreeclampsiathep4study
AT mangosgeorge recognizingcardiovascularriskafterpreeclampsiathep4study
AT osullivananthony recognizingcardiovascularriskafterpreeclampsiathep4study
AT pettitfranziska recognizingcardiovascularriskafterpreeclampsiathep4study
AT youssefgeorge recognizingcardiovascularriskafterpreeclampsiathep4study
AT xulily recognizingcardiovascularriskafterpreeclampsiathep4study
AT davisgregoryk recognizingcardiovascularriskafterpreeclampsiathep4study