Cargando…

Inter/Intra‐Atrial Dissociation in Patients With Maze Procedure and Its Clinical Implications: Pseudo‐Block and Pseudo‐Ventricular Tachycardia

BACKGROUND: Severe conduction delay and inter/intra‐atrial dissociation may occur in patients who undergo an extensive catheter ablation or a maze procedure for atrial tachyarrhythmia. We report a series of patients with inter/intra‐atrial dissociation that mimicked complete atrioventricular block o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Do, Ungjeong, Nam, Gi‐Byoung, Kim, Minsoo, Cho, Min Soo, Kim, Jun, Choi, Kee‐Joon, Kim, You‐Ho
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7763795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33215559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1161/JAHA.120.018241
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Severe conduction delay and inter/intra‐atrial dissociation may occur in patients who undergo an extensive catheter ablation or a maze procedure for atrial tachyarrhythmia. We report a series of patients with inter/intra‐atrial dissociation that mimicked complete atrioventricular block or ventricular tachycardia. METHODS AND RESULTS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of 7 patients who were referred for the evaluation of atrioventricular block (patients 1–6) or ventricular tachycardia (patient 7) that occurred after biatrial maze procedure and valvular surgery. During the electrophysiologic study, slow atrial or junctional escape rhythm dissociated from isolated atrial activity mimicked complete atrioventricular blocks. Intra‐atrial dissociation of the right atrium or left atrium was observed. Atrioventricular nodal conduction from the nondissociated atrium to the ventricle was preserved in all patients, while the conduction from the dissociated atrium was blocked. In patient 7, the pacing of the ventricle by tracking of atrial tachycardia from the nondissociated left atrium/coronary sinus mimicked ventricular tachycardia during pacemaker interrogation. A total of 5 patients received new permanent pacemaker implantations during the index hospitalization for the surgery (n=2) or as a deferred procedure (n=3) according to the treatment for sick sinus syndrome. CONCLUSIONS: Pseudo‐atrioventricular block or pseudo‐ventricular tachycardia may occur because of inter/intra‐atrial dissociation after a maze procedure. The selection of patients for permanent pacemaker implantation should be determined based on the patient’s symptoms and the status of the escape pacemaker and not on the apparent atrioventricular block. Proper diagnosis is important to avoid unnecessary implantation of a pacemaker or a defibrillator.