Cargando…
Does Active Design Influence Activity, Sitting, Wellbeing and Productivity in the Workplace? A Systematic Review
Active design is an emerging concept to incorporate physical activity into daily life through thoughtful design, and is often implemented in new building designs. It is, however, not known what evidence base there is to support the claims. Through this systematic review, the current evidence for act...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7764065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33321818 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249228 |
_version_ | 1783628168008040448 |
---|---|
author | Engelen, Lina |
author_facet | Engelen, Lina |
author_sort | Engelen, Lina |
collection | PubMed |
description | Active design is an emerging concept to incorporate physical activity into daily life through thoughtful design, and is often implemented in new building designs. It is, however, not known what evidence base there is to support the claims. Through this systematic review, the current evidence for active design was investigated. Seven databases were searched. A range of search terms relating to active design, physical activity, sitting, performance and wellbeing were used. After title and abstract screening of 1174 papers and full-text screening, 17 were selected for inclusion. The papers provided promising evidence of active design aiding a reduction in sitting and increase in standing time. Limited evidence was found for physical activity; a few studies reported an increase in step counts. Musculoskeletal effects were investigated in few studies, but there is some evidence of benefits to lower back pain. There was consistent evidence for better light and air quality, but no evidence for other features of the workplace environment. No conclusive evidence was found on associations between active design features and work performance. There is hence some evidence to support the benefit of active design on physical health; however, the dearth and heterogeneity of the study designs, measures and findings warrant further research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7764065 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77640652020-12-27 Does Active Design Influence Activity, Sitting, Wellbeing and Productivity in the Workplace? A Systematic Review Engelen, Lina Int J Environ Res Public Health Review Active design is an emerging concept to incorporate physical activity into daily life through thoughtful design, and is often implemented in new building designs. It is, however, not known what evidence base there is to support the claims. Through this systematic review, the current evidence for active design was investigated. Seven databases were searched. A range of search terms relating to active design, physical activity, sitting, performance and wellbeing were used. After title and abstract screening of 1174 papers and full-text screening, 17 were selected for inclusion. The papers provided promising evidence of active design aiding a reduction in sitting and increase in standing time. Limited evidence was found for physical activity; a few studies reported an increase in step counts. Musculoskeletal effects were investigated in few studies, but there is some evidence of benefits to lower back pain. There was consistent evidence for better light and air quality, but no evidence for other features of the workplace environment. No conclusive evidence was found on associations between active design features and work performance. There is hence some evidence to support the benefit of active design on physical health; however, the dearth and heterogeneity of the study designs, measures and findings warrant further research. MDPI 2020-12-10 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7764065/ /pubmed/33321818 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249228 Text en © 2020 by the author. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Engelen, Lina Does Active Design Influence Activity, Sitting, Wellbeing and Productivity in the Workplace? A Systematic Review |
title | Does Active Design Influence Activity, Sitting, Wellbeing and Productivity in the Workplace? A Systematic Review |
title_full | Does Active Design Influence Activity, Sitting, Wellbeing and Productivity in the Workplace? A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Does Active Design Influence Activity, Sitting, Wellbeing and Productivity in the Workplace? A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Does Active Design Influence Activity, Sitting, Wellbeing and Productivity in the Workplace? A Systematic Review |
title_short | Does Active Design Influence Activity, Sitting, Wellbeing and Productivity in the Workplace? A Systematic Review |
title_sort | does active design influence activity, sitting, wellbeing and productivity in the workplace? a systematic review |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7764065/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33321818 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249228 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT engelenlina doesactivedesigninfluenceactivitysittingwellbeingandproductivityintheworkplaceasystematicreview |