Cargando…

The Rolf Method of Structural Integration and Pelvic Floor Muscle Facilitation: Preliminary Results of a Randomized, Interventional Study

The management of pelvic floor dysfunctions might need to be based on a comprehensive neuro-musculoskeletal therapy such as The Rolf Method of Structural Integration (SI). The aim of the study was to evaluate the pelvic floor muscle (PFM) after the tenth session of SI by using surface electromyograp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kasper-Jędrzejewska, Martyna, Jędrzejewski, Grzegorz, Ptaszkowska, Lucyna, Ptaszkowski, Kuba, Schleip, Robert, Halski, Tomasz
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7764274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33316903
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9123981
_version_ 1783628217864683520
author Kasper-Jędrzejewska, Martyna
Jędrzejewski, Grzegorz
Ptaszkowska, Lucyna
Ptaszkowski, Kuba
Schleip, Robert
Halski, Tomasz
author_facet Kasper-Jędrzejewska, Martyna
Jędrzejewski, Grzegorz
Ptaszkowska, Lucyna
Ptaszkowski, Kuba
Schleip, Robert
Halski, Tomasz
author_sort Kasper-Jędrzejewska, Martyna
collection PubMed
description The management of pelvic floor dysfunctions might need to be based on a comprehensive neuro-musculoskeletal therapy such as The Rolf Method of Structural Integration (SI). The aim of the study was to evaluate the pelvic floor muscle (PFM) after the tenth session of SI by using surface electromyography (sEMG). This was a randomized, interventional study. Thirty-three healthy women were randomly assigned to the experimental (SI) or control group. The outcome measures included PFM bioelectrical activity, assessed using sEMG and endovaginal probes. An intervention in the SI group included 60 min of SI once a week, and teaching on how to contract and relax PFMs; in the control group, only the teaching was carried out. In the SI group, a significant difference was found between the PFM sEMG activity during “pre-baseline rest” (p < 0.014) and that during “rest after tonic contraction” (p = 0.021) in the supine position, as were significant increases in “phasic contraction” in the standing position (p = 0.014). In the intergroup comparison, higher PFM sEMG activity after the intervention “phasic contraction” (p = 0.037) and “pre-baseline rest” (p = 0.028) was observed in the SI group. The SI intervention significantly changes some functional bioelectrical activity of PFMs, providing a basis for further research on a new approach to PFM facilitation, particularly in clinical populations.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7764274
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77642742020-12-27 The Rolf Method of Structural Integration and Pelvic Floor Muscle Facilitation: Preliminary Results of a Randomized, Interventional Study Kasper-Jędrzejewska, Martyna Jędrzejewski, Grzegorz Ptaszkowska, Lucyna Ptaszkowski, Kuba Schleip, Robert Halski, Tomasz J Clin Med Article The management of pelvic floor dysfunctions might need to be based on a comprehensive neuro-musculoskeletal therapy such as The Rolf Method of Structural Integration (SI). The aim of the study was to evaluate the pelvic floor muscle (PFM) after the tenth session of SI by using surface electromyography (sEMG). This was a randomized, interventional study. Thirty-three healthy women were randomly assigned to the experimental (SI) or control group. The outcome measures included PFM bioelectrical activity, assessed using sEMG and endovaginal probes. An intervention in the SI group included 60 min of SI once a week, and teaching on how to contract and relax PFMs; in the control group, only the teaching was carried out. In the SI group, a significant difference was found between the PFM sEMG activity during “pre-baseline rest” (p < 0.014) and that during “rest after tonic contraction” (p = 0.021) in the supine position, as were significant increases in “phasic contraction” in the standing position (p = 0.014). In the intergroup comparison, higher PFM sEMG activity after the intervention “phasic contraction” (p = 0.037) and “pre-baseline rest” (p = 0.028) was observed in the SI group. The SI intervention significantly changes some functional bioelectrical activity of PFMs, providing a basis for further research on a new approach to PFM facilitation, particularly in clinical populations. MDPI 2020-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC7764274/ /pubmed/33316903 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9123981 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kasper-Jędrzejewska, Martyna
Jędrzejewski, Grzegorz
Ptaszkowska, Lucyna
Ptaszkowski, Kuba
Schleip, Robert
Halski, Tomasz
The Rolf Method of Structural Integration and Pelvic Floor Muscle Facilitation: Preliminary Results of a Randomized, Interventional Study
title The Rolf Method of Structural Integration and Pelvic Floor Muscle Facilitation: Preliminary Results of a Randomized, Interventional Study
title_full The Rolf Method of Structural Integration and Pelvic Floor Muscle Facilitation: Preliminary Results of a Randomized, Interventional Study
title_fullStr The Rolf Method of Structural Integration and Pelvic Floor Muscle Facilitation: Preliminary Results of a Randomized, Interventional Study
title_full_unstemmed The Rolf Method of Structural Integration and Pelvic Floor Muscle Facilitation: Preliminary Results of a Randomized, Interventional Study
title_short The Rolf Method of Structural Integration and Pelvic Floor Muscle Facilitation: Preliminary Results of a Randomized, Interventional Study
title_sort rolf method of structural integration and pelvic floor muscle facilitation: preliminary results of a randomized, interventional study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7764274/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33316903
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm9123981
work_keys_str_mv AT kasperjedrzejewskamartyna therolfmethodofstructuralintegrationandpelvicfloormusclefacilitationpreliminaryresultsofarandomizedinterventionalstudy
AT jedrzejewskigrzegorz therolfmethodofstructuralintegrationandpelvicfloormusclefacilitationpreliminaryresultsofarandomizedinterventionalstudy
AT ptaszkowskalucyna therolfmethodofstructuralintegrationandpelvicfloormusclefacilitationpreliminaryresultsofarandomizedinterventionalstudy
AT ptaszkowskikuba therolfmethodofstructuralintegrationandpelvicfloormusclefacilitationpreliminaryresultsofarandomizedinterventionalstudy
AT schleiprobert therolfmethodofstructuralintegrationandpelvicfloormusclefacilitationpreliminaryresultsofarandomizedinterventionalstudy
AT halskitomasz therolfmethodofstructuralintegrationandpelvicfloormusclefacilitationpreliminaryresultsofarandomizedinterventionalstudy
AT kasperjedrzejewskamartyna rolfmethodofstructuralintegrationandpelvicfloormusclefacilitationpreliminaryresultsofarandomizedinterventionalstudy
AT jedrzejewskigrzegorz rolfmethodofstructuralintegrationandpelvicfloormusclefacilitationpreliminaryresultsofarandomizedinterventionalstudy
AT ptaszkowskalucyna rolfmethodofstructuralintegrationandpelvicfloormusclefacilitationpreliminaryresultsofarandomizedinterventionalstudy
AT ptaszkowskikuba rolfmethodofstructuralintegrationandpelvicfloormusclefacilitationpreliminaryresultsofarandomizedinterventionalstudy
AT schleiprobert rolfmethodofstructuralintegrationandpelvicfloormusclefacilitationpreliminaryresultsofarandomizedinterventionalstudy
AT halskitomasz rolfmethodofstructuralintegrationandpelvicfloormusclefacilitationpreliminaryresultsofarandomizedinterventionalstudy