Cargando…

Rise and Recharge: Effects on Activity Outcomes of an e-Health Smartphone Intervention to Reduce Office Workers’ Sitting Time

This feasibility study evaluated the effects of an individual-level intervention to target office workers total and prolonged sedentary behaviour during working hours, using an e-health smartphone application. A three-arm (Prompt-30 or 60 min Intervention arm and a No-Prompt Comparison arm), quasi-r...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Morris, Abigail S., Mackintosh, Kelly A., Dunstan, David, Owen, Neville, Dempsey, Paddy, Pennington, Thomas, McNarry, Melitta A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7764765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33322678
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249300
_version_ 1783628334395031552
author Morris, Abigail S.
Mackintosh, Kelly A.
Dunstan, David
Owen, Neville
Dempsey, Paddy
Pennington, Thomas
McNarry, Melitta A.
author_facet Morris, Abigail S.
Mackintosh, Kelly A.
Dunstan, David
Owen, Neville
Dempsey, Paddy
Pennington, Thomas
McNarry, Melitta A.
author_sort Morris, Abigail S.
collection PubMed
description This feasibility study evaluated the effects of an individual-level intervention to target office workers total and prolonged sedentary behaviour during working hours, using an e-health smartphone application. A three-arm (Prompt-30 or 60 min Intervention arm and a No-Prompt Comparison arm), quasi-randomised intervention was conducted over 12 weeks. Behavioural outcomes (worktime sitting, standing, stepping, prolonged sitting, and physical activity) were monitored using accelerometers and anthropometrics measured at baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks. Cardiometabolic measures were taken at baseline and 12 weeks. Fifty-six office workers (64% female) completed baseline assessments. The Prompt-60 arm was associated with a reduction in occupational sitting time at 6 (−46.8 min/8 h workday [95% confidence interval = −86.4, −6.6], p < 0.05) and 12 weeks (−69.6 min/8 h workday [−111.0, −28.2], p < 0.05) relative to the No-Prompt Comparison arm. Sitting was primarily replaced with standing in both arms (p > 0.05). Both Intervention arms reduced time in prolonged sitting bouts at 12 weeks (Prompt-30: −27.0 [−99.0, 45.0]; Prompt-60: −25.8 [−98.4, 47.4] min/8 h workday; both p > 0.05). There were no changes in steps or cardiometabolic risk. Findings highlight the potential of a smartphone e-health application, suggesting 60 min prompts may present an optimal frequency to reduce total occupational sedentary behaviour.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7764765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77647652020-12-27 Rise and Recharge: Effects on Activity Outcomes of an e-Health Smartphone Intervention to Reduce Office Workers’ Sitting Time Morris, Abigail S. Mackintosh, Kelly A. Dunstan, David Owen, Neville Dempsey, Paddy Pennington, Thomas McNarry, Melitta A. Int J Environ Res Public Health Article This feasibility study evaluated the effects of an individual-level intervention to target office workers total and prolonged sedentary behaviour during working hours, using an e-health smartphone application. A three-arm (Prompt-30 or 60 min Intervention arm and a No-Prompt Comparison arm), quasi-randomised intervention was conducted over 12 weeks. Behavioural outcomes (worktime sitting, standing, stepping, prolonged sitting, and physical activity) were monitored using accelerometers and anthropometrics measured at baseline, 6 weeks and 12 weeks. Cardiometabolic measures were taken at baseline and 12 weeks. Fifty-six office workers (64% female) completed baseline assessments. The Prompt-60 arm was associated with a reduction in occupational sitting time at 6 (−46.8 min/8 h workday [95% confidence interval = −86.4, −6.6], p < 0.05) and 12 weeks (−69.6 min/8 h workday [−111.0, −28.2], p < 0.05) relative to the No-Prompt Comparison arm. Sitting was primarily replaced with standing in both arms (p > 0.05). Both Intervention arms reduced time in prolonged sitting bouts at 12 weeks (Prompt-30: −27.0 [−99.0, 45.0]; Prompt-60: −25.8 [−98.4, 47.4] min/8 h workday; both p > 0.05). There were no changes in steps or cardiometabolic risk. Findings highlight the potential of a smartphone e-health application, suggesting 60 min prompts may present an optimal frequency to reduce total occupational sedentary behaviour. MDPI 2020-12-12 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7764765/ /pubmed/33322678 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249300 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Morris, Abigail S.
Mackintosh, Kelly A.
Dunstan, David
Owen, Neville
Dempsey, Paddy
Pennington, Thomas
McNarry, Melitta A.
Rise and Recharge: Effects on Activity Outcomes of an e-Health Smartphone Intervention to Reduce Office Workers’ Sitting Time
title Rise and Recharge: Effects on Activity Outcomes of an e-Health Smartphone Intervention to Reduce Office Workers’ Sitting Time
title_full Rise and Recharge: Effects on Activity Outcomes of an e-Health Smartphone Intervention to Reduce Office Workers’ Sitting Time
title_fullStr Rise and Recharge: Effects on Activity Outcomes of an e-Health Smartphone Intervention to Reduce Office Workers’ Sitting Time
title_full_unstemmed Rise and Recharge: Effects on Activity Outcomes of an e-Health Smartphone Intervention to Reduce Office Workers’ Sitting Time
title_short Rise and Recharge: Effects on Activity Outcomes of an e-Health Smartphone Intervention to Reduce Office Workers’ Sitting Time
title_sort rise and recharge: effects on activity outcomes of an e-health smartphone intervention to reduce office workers’ sitting time
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7764765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33322678
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249300
work_keys_str_mv AT morrisabigails riseandrechargeeffectsonactivityoutcomesofanehealthsmartphoneinterventiontoreduceofficeworkerssittingtime
AT mackintoshkellya riseandrechargeeffectsonactivityoutcomesofanehealthsmartphoneinterventiontoreduceofficeworkerssittingtime
AT dunstandavid riseandrechargeeffectsonactivityoutcomesofanehealthsmartphoneinterventiontoreduceofficeworkerssittingtime
AT owenneville riseandrechargeeffectsonactivityoutcomesofanehealthsmartphoneinterventiontoreduceofficeworkerssittingtime
AT dempseypaddy riseandrechargeeffectsonactivityoutcomesofanehealthsmartphoneinterventiontoreduceofficeworkerssittingtime
AT penningtonthomas riseandrechargeeffectsonactivityoutcomesofanehealthsmartphoneinterventiontoreduceofficeworkerssittingtime
AT mcnarrymelittaa riseandrechargeeffectsonactivityoutcomesofanehealthsmartphoneinterventiontoreduceofficeworkerssittingtime