Cargando…

Development of a Biomarker Panel to Distinguish Risk of Progressive Chronic Kidney Disease

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients typically progress to kidney failure, but the rate of progression differs per patient or may not occur at all. Current CKD screening methods are sub-optimal at predicting progressive kidney function decline. This investigation develops a model for predicting pro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Owens, Evan, Tan, Ken-Soon, Ellis, Robert, Del Vecchio, Sharon, Humphries, Tyrone, Lennan, Erica, Vesey, David, Healy, Helen, Hoy, Wendy, Gobe, Glenda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7764886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33327377
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8120606
_version_ 1783628363107139584
author Owens, Evan
Tan, Ken-Soon
Ellis, Robert
Del Vecchio, Sharon
Humphries, Tyrone
Lennan, Erica
Vesey, David
Healy, Helen
Hoy, Wendy
Gobe, Glenda
author_facet Owens, Evan
Tan, Ken-Soon
Ellis, Robert
Del Vecchio, Sharon
Humphries, Tyrone
Lennan, Erica
Vesey, David
Healy, Helen
Hoy, Wendy
Gobe, Glenda
author_sort Owens, Evan
collection PubMed
description Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients typically progress to kidney failure, but the rate of progression differs per patient or may not occur at all. Current CKD screening methods are sub-optimal at predicting progressive kidney function decline. This investigation develops a model for predicting progressive CKD based on a panel of biomarkers representing the pathophysiological processes of CKD, kidney function, and common CKD comorbidities. Two patient cohorts are utilised: The CKD Queensland Registry (n = 418), termed the Biomarker Discovery cohort; and the CKD Biobank (n = 62), termed the Predictive Model cohort. Progression status is assigned with a composite outcome of a ≥30% decline in eGFR from baseline, initiation of dialysis, or kidney transplantation. Baseline biomarker measurements are compared between progressive and non-progressive patients via logistic regression. In the Biomarker Discovery cohort, 13 biomarkers differed significantly between progressive and non-progressive patients, while 10 differed in the Predictive Model cohort. From this, a predictive model, based on a biomarker panel of serum creatinine, osteopontin, tryptase, urea, and eGFR, was calculated via linear discriminant analysis. This model has an accuracy of 84.3% when predicting future progressive CKD at baseline, greater than eGFR (66.1%), sCr (67.7%), albuminuria (53.2%), or albumin-creatinine ratio (53.2%).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7764886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77648862020-12-27 Development of a Biomarker Panel to Distinguish Risk of Progressive Chronic Kidney Disease Owens, Evan Tan, Ken-Soon Ellis, Robert Del Vecchio, Sharon Humphries, Tyrone Lennan, Erica Vesey, David Healy, Helen Hoy, Wendy Gobe, Glenda Biomedicines Article Chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients typically progress to kidney failure, but the rate of progression differs per patient or may not occur at all. Current CKD screening methods are sub-optimal at predicting progressive kidney function decline. This investigation develops a model for predicting progressive CKD based on a panel of biomarkers representing the pathophysiological processes of CKD, kidney function, and common CKD comorbidities. Two patient cohorts are utilised: The CKD Queensland Registry (n = 418), termed the Biomarker Discovery cohort; and the CKD Biobank (n = 62), termed the Predictive Model cohort. Progression status is assigned with a composite outcome of a ≥30% decline in eGFR from baseline, initiation of dialysis, or kidney transplantation. Baseline biomarker measurements are compared between progressive and non-progressive patients via logistic regression. In the Biomarker Discovery cohort, 13 biomarkers differed significantly between progressive and non-progressive patients, while 10 differed in the Predictive Model cohort. From this, a predictive model, based on a biomarker panel of serum creatinine, osteopontin, tryptase, urea, and eGFR, was calculated via linear discriminant analysis. This model has an accuracy of 84.3% when predicting future progressive CKD at baseline, greater than eGFR (66.1%), sCr (67.7%), albuminuria (53.2%), or albumin-creatinine ratio (53.2%). MDPI 2020-12-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7764886/ /pubmed/33327377 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8120606 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Owens, Evan
Tan, Ken-Soon
Ellis, Robert
Del Vecchio, Sharon
Humphries, Tyrone
Lennan, Erica
Vesey, David
Healy, Helen
Hoy, Wendy
Gobe, Glenda
Development of a Biomarker Panel to Distinguish Risk of Progressive Chronic Kidney Disease
title Development of a Biomarker Panel to Distinguish Risk of Progressive Chronic Kidney Disease
title_full Development of a Biomarker Panel to Distinguish Risk of Progressive Chronic Kidney Disease
title_fullStr Development of a Biomarker Panel to Distinguish Risk of Progressive Chronic Kidney Disease
title_full_unstemmed Development of a Biomarker Panel to Distinguish Risk of Progressive Chronic Kidney Disease
title_short Development of a Biomarker Panel to Distinguish Risk of Progressive Chronic Kidney Disease
title_sort development of a biomarker panel to distinguish risk of progressive chronic kidney disease
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7764886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33327377
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines8120606
work_keys_str_mv AT owensevan developmentofabiomarkerpaneltodistinguishriskofprogressivechronickidneydisease
AT tankensoon developmentofabiomarkerpaneltodistinguishriskofprogressivechronickidneydisease
AT ellisrobert developmentofabiomarkerpaneltodistinguishriskofprogressivechronickidneydisease
AT delvecchiosharon developmentofabiomarkerpaneltodistinguishriskofprogressivechronickidneydisease
AT humphriestyrone developmentofabiomarkerpaneltodistinguishriskofprogressivechronickidneydisease
AT lennanerica developmentofabiomarkerpaneltodistinguishriskofprogressivechronickidneydisease
AT veseydavid developmentofabiomarkerpaneltodistinguishriskofprogressivechronickidneydisease
AT healyhelen developmentofabiomarkerpaneltodistinguishriskofprogressivechronickidneydisease
AT hoywendy developmentofabiomarkerpaneltodistinguishriskofprogressivechronickidneydisease
AT gobeglenda developmentofabiomarkerpaneltodistinguishriskofprogressivechronickidneydisease