Cargando…
Validation of an Intra-Oral Scan Method Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography Superimposition to Assess the Accuracy between Planned and Achieved Dental Implants: A Randomized In Vitro Study
Computer aided implantology is the safest way to perform dental implants. The research of high accuracy represents a daily effort. The validated method to assess the accuracy of placed dental implants is the superimposition of a pre-operative and a post-operative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT)...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7765074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33542168 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249358 |
_version_ | 1783628406273867776 |
---|---|
author | Franchina, Alessio Stefanelli, Luigi V. Maltese, Fabio Mandelaris, George A. Vantaggiato, Alessandro Pagliarulo, Michele Pranno, Nicola Brauner, Edoardo Angelis, Francesca De Carlo, Stefano Di |
author_facet | Franchina, Alessio Stefanelli, Luigi V. Maltese, Fabio Mandelaris, George A. Vantaggiato, Alessandro Pagliarulo, Michele Pranno, Nicola Brauner, Edoardo Angelis, Francesca De Carlo, Stefano Di |
author_sort | Franchina, Alessio |
collection | PubMed |
description | Computer aided implantology is the safest way to perform dental implants. The research of high accuracy represents a daily effort. The validated method to assess the accuracy of placed dental implants is the superimposition of a pre-operative and a post-operative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) with planned and placed implants. This procedure is accountable for a biologic cost for the patient. To investigate alternative procedure for accuracy assessment, fifteen resin casts were printed. For each model, six implants were digitally planned and then placed following three different approaches: (a) template guided free hand, (b) static computer aided implantology (SCAI), and (c) dynamic computer aided implantology (DCAI). The placement accuracy of each implant was performed via two methods: the CBCT comparison described above and a matching between implant positions recovered from the original surgical plan with those obtained with a post-operative intraoral scan (IOS). Statistically significant mean differences between guided groups (SCAI and DCAI) and the free hand group were found at all considered deviations, while no differences resulted between the SCAI and DCAI approaches. Moreover, no mean statistically significant differences were found between CBCT and IOS assessment, confirming the validity of this new method. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7765074 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77650742020-12-27 Validation of an Intra-Oral Scan Method Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography Superimposition to Assess the Accuracy between Planned and Achieved Dental Implants: A Randomized In Vitro Study Franchina, Alessio Stefanelli, Luigi V. Maltese, Fabio Mandelaris, George A. Vantaggiato, Alessandro Pagliarulo, Michele Pranno, Nicola Brauner, Edoardo Angelis, Francesca De Carlo, Stefano Di Int J Environ Res Public Health Study Protocol Computer aided implantology is the safest way to perform dental implants. The research of high accuracy represents a daily effort. The validated method to assess the accuracy of placed dental implants is the superimposition of a pre-operative and a post-operative cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) with planned and placed implants. This procedure is accountable for a biologic cost for the patient. To investigate alternative procedure for accuracy assessment, fifteen resin casts were printed. For each model, six implants were digitally planned and then placed following three different approaches: (a) template guided free hand, (b) static computer aided implantology (SCAI), and (c) dynamic computer aided implantology (DCAI). The placement accuracy of each implant was performed via two methods: the CBCT comparison described above and a matching between implant positions recovered from the original surgical plan with those obtained with a post-operative intraoral scan (IOS). Statistically significant mean differences between guided groups (SCAI and DCAI) and the free hand group were found at all considered deviations, while no differences resulted between the SCAI and DCAI approaches. Moreover, no mean statistically significant differences were found between CBCT and IOS assessment, confirming the validity of this new method. MDPI 2020-12-14 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7765074/ /pubmed/33542168 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249358 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Study Protocol Franchina, Alessio Stefanelli, Luigi V. Maltese, Fabio Mandelaris, George A. Vantaggiato, Alessandro Pagliarulo, Michele Pranno, Nicola Brauner, Edoardo Angelis, Francesca De Carlo, Stefano Di Validation of an Intra-Oral Scan Method Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography Superimposition to Assess the Accuracy between Planned and Achieved Dental Implants: A Randomized In Vitro Study |
title | Validation of an Intra-Oral Scan Method Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography Superimposition to Assess the Accuracy between Planned and Achieved Dental Implants: A Randomized In Vitro Study |
title_full | Validation of an Intra-Oral Scan Method Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography Superimposition to Assess the Accuracy between Planned and Achieved Dental Implants: A Randomized In Vitro Study |
title_fullStr | Validation of an Intra-Oral Scan Method Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography Superimposition to Assess the Accuracy between Planned and Achieved Dental Implants: A Randomized In Vitro Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Validation of an Intra-Oral Scan Method Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography Superimposition to Assess the Accuracy between Planned and Achieved Dental Implants: A Randomized In Vitro Study |
title_short | Validation of an Intra-Oral Scan Method Versus Cone Beam Computed Tomography Superimposition to Assess the Accuracy between Planned and Achieved Dental Implants: A Randomized In Vitro Study |
title_sort | validation of an intra-oral scan method versus cone beam computed tomography superimposition to assess the accuracy between planned and achieved dental implants: a randomized in vitro study |
topic | Study Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7765074/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33542168 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17249358 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT franchinaalessio validationofanintraoralscanmethodversusconebeamcomputedtomographysuperimpositiontoassesstheaccuracybetweenplannedandachieveddentalimplantsarandomizedinvitrostudy AT stefanelliluigiv validationofanintraoralscanmethodversusconebeamcomputedtomographysuperimpositiontoassesstheaccuracybetweenplannedandachieveddentalimplantsarandomizedinvitrostudy AT maltesefabio validationofanintraoralscanmethodversusconebeamcomputedtomographysuperimpositiontoassesstheaccuracybetweenplannedandachieveddentalimplantsarandomizedinvitrostudy AT mandelarisgeorgea validationofanintraoralscanmethodversusconebeamcomputedtomographysuperimpositiontoassesstheaccuracybetweenplannedandachieveddentalimplantsarandomizedinvitrostudy AT vantaggiatoalessandro validationofanintraoralscanmethodversusconebeamcomputedtomographysuperimpositiontoassesstheaccuracybetweenplannedandachieveddentalimplantsarandomizedinvitrostudy AT pagliarulomichele validationofanintraoralscanmethodversusconebeamcomputedtomographysuperimpositiontoassesstheaccuracybetweenplannedandachieveddentalimplantsarandomizedinvitrostudy AT prannonicola validationofanintraoralscanmethodversusconebeamcomputedtomographysuperimpositiontoassesstheaccuracybetweenplannedandachieveddentalimplantsarandomizedinvitrostudy AT brauneredoardo validationofanintraoralscanmethodversusconebeamcomputedtomographysuperimpositiontoassesstheaccuracybetweenplannedandachieveddentalimplantsarandomizedinvitrostudy AT angelisfrancescade validationofanintraoralscanmethodversusconebeamcomputedtomographysuperimpositiontoassesstheaccuracybetweenplannedandachieveddentalimplantsarandomizedinvitrostudy AT carlostefanodi validationofanintraoralscanmethodversusconebeamcomputedtomographysuperimpositiontoassesstheaccuracybetweenplannedandachieveddentalimplantsarandomizedinvitrostudy |