Cargando…
A Prospective Phase II Study Evaluating Intraoperative Electrochemotherapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
SIMPLE SUMMARY: Electrochemotherapy is fast developing local ablative therapy that is nowadays being adapted also for the treatment of deep-seated tumors. The first reports demonstrated the feasibility and safety of the procedure in liver tumors, i.e., colorectal liver metastases and hepatocellular...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7765454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33333941 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12123778 |
_version_ | 1783628494117273600 |
---|---|
author | Djokic, Mihajlo Cemazar, Maja Bosnjak, Masa Dezman, Rok Badovinac, David Miklavcic, Damijan Kos, Bor Stabuc, Miha Stabuc, Borut Jansa, Rado Popovic, Peter Smid, Lojze M. Sersa, Gregor Trotovsek, Blaz |
author_facet | Djokic, Mihajlo Cemazar, Maja Bosnjak, Masa Dezman, Rok Badovinac, David Miklavcic, Damijan Kos, Bor Stabuc, Miha Stabuc, Borut Jansa, Rado Popovic, Peter Smid, Lojze M. Sersa, Gregor Trotovsek, Blaz |
author_sort | Djokic, Mihajlo |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: Electrochemotherapy is fast developing local ablative therapy that is nowadays being adapted also for the treatment of deep-seated tumors. The first reports demonstrated the feasibility and safety of the procedure in liver tumors, i.e., colorectal liver metastases and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This prospective phase II study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and long-term safety of electrochemotherapy in the treatment of primary HCC not suitable for other treatment options. Electrochemotherapy was performed intraoperatively in 24 patients and proved to be effective, feasible, and safe with some procedure-related side effects. In the 32 treated tumors, a high response rate was achieved: 84.4% complete responses, 12.5% partial responses, and 3.1% stable disease with the durable response over 50 months in 78.0% of the treated nodules. Based on the current evidence, electrochemotherapy (ECT) can be considered as a treatment option for HCC in the cirrhotic liver not suitable for other curative treatment options according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification (BCLC) classification. ABSTRACT: The aim of this clinical study was to investigate the effectiveness and long-term safety of electrochemotherapy as an emerging treatment for HCC in patients not suitable for other treatment options. A prospective phase II clinical study was conducted in patients with primary HCC who were not suitable for other treatment options according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification. A total of 24 patients with 32 tumors were treated by electrochemotherapy. The procedure was effective, feasible, and safe with some procedure-related side effects. The responses of the 32 treated nodules were: 84.4% complete response (CR), 12.5% partial response (PR), and 3.1% stable disease (SD). The treatment was equally effective for nodules located centrally and peripherally. Electrochemotherapy provided a durable response with local tumor control over 50 months of observation in 78.0% of nodules. The patient responses were: 79.2% CR and 16.6% PR. The median progression-free survival was 12 months (range 2.7–50), and the overall survival over 5 years of observation was 72.0%. This prospective phase II clinical study showed that electrochemotherapy was an effective, feasible, and safe option for treating HCC in patients not suitable for other treatment options. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7765454 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77654542020-12-27 A Prospective Phase II Study Evaluating Intraoperative Electrochemotherapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma Djokic, Mihajlo Cemazar, Maja Bosnjak, Masa Dezman, Rok Badovinac, David Miklavcic, Damijan Kos, Bor Stabuc, Miha Stabuc, Borut Jansa, Rado Popovic, Peter Smid, Lojze M. Sersa, Gregor Trotovsek, Blaz Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: Electrochemotherapy is fast developing local ablative therapy that is nowadays being adapted also for the treatment of deep-seated tumors. The first reports demonstrated the feasibility and safety of the procedure in liver tumors, i.e., colorectal liver metastases and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This prospective phase II study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and long-term safety of electrochemotherapy in the treatment of primary HCC not suitable for other treatment options. Electrochemotherapy was performed intraoperatively in 24 patients and proved to be effective, feasible, and safe with some procedure-related side effects. In the 32 treated tumors, a high response rate was achieved: 84.4% complete responses, 12.5% partial responses, and 3.1% stable disease with the durable response over 50 months in 78.0% of the treated nodules. Based on the current evidence, electrochemotherapy (ECT) can be considered as a treatment option for HCC in the cirrhotic liver not suitable for other curative treatment options according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification (BCLC) classification. ABSTRACT: The aim of this clinical study was to investigate the effectiveness and long-term safety of electrochemotherapy as an emerging treatment for HCC in patients not suitable for other treatment options. A prospective phase II clinical study was conducted in patients with primary HCC who were not suitable for other treatment options according to the Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer classification. A total of 24 patients with 32 tumors were treated by electrochemotherapy. The procedure was effective, feasible, and safe with some procedure-related side effects. The responses of the 32 treated nodules were: 84.4% complete response (CR), 12.5% partial response (PR), and 3.1% stable disease (SD). The treatment was equally effective for nodules located centrally and peripherally. Electrochemotherapy provided a durable response with local tumor control over 50 months of observation in 78.0% of nodules. The patient responses were: 79.2% CR and 16.6% PR. The median progression-free survival was 12 months (range 2.7–50), and the overall survival over 5 years of observation was 72.0%. This prospective phase II clinical study showed that electrochemotherapy was an effective, feasible, and safe option for treating HCC in patients not suitable for other treatment options. MDPI 2020-12-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7765454/ /pubmed/33333941 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12123778 Text en © 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Djokic, Mihajlo Cemazar, Maja Bosnjak, Masa Dezman, Rok Badovinac, David Miklavcic, Damijan Kos, Bor Stabuc, Miha Stabuc, Borut Jansa, Rado Popovic, Peter Smid, Lojze M. Sersa, Gregor Trotovsek, Blaz A Prospective Phase II Study Evaluating Intraoperative Electrochemotherapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title | A Prospective Phase II Study Evaluating Intraoperative Electrochemotherapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_full | A Prospective Phase II Study Evaluating Intraoperative Electrochemotherapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_fullStr | A Prospective Phase II Study Evaluating Intraoperative Electrochemotherapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_full_unstemmed | A Prospective Phase II Study Evaluating Intraoperative Electrochemotherapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_short | A Prospective Phase II Study Evaluating Intraoperative Electrochemotherapy of Hepatocellular Carcinoma |
title_sort | prospective phase ii study evaluating intraoperative electrochemotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7765454/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33333941 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers12123778 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT djokicmihajlo aprospectivephaseiistudyevaluatingintraoperativeelectrochemotherapyofhepatocellularcarcinoma AT cemazarmaja aprospectivephaseiistudyevaluatingintraoperativeelectrochemotherapyofhepatocellularcarcinoma AT bosnjakmasa aprospectivephaseiistudyevaluatingintraoperativeelectrochemotherapyofhepatocellularcarcinoma AT dezmanrok aprospectivephaseiistudyevaluatingintraoperativeelectrochemotherapyofhepatocellularcarcinoma AT badovinacdavid aprospectivephaseiistudyevaluatingintraoperativeelectrochemotherapyofhepatocellularcarcinoma AT miklavcicdamijan aprospectivephaseiistudyevaluatingintraoperativeelectrochemotherapyofhepatocellularcarcinoma AT kosbor aprospectivephaseiistudyevaluatingintraoperativeelectrochemotherapyofhepatocellularcarcinoma AT stabucmiha aprospectivephaseiistudyevaluatingintraoperativeelectrochemotherapyofhepatocellularcarcinoma AT stabucborut aprospectivephaseiistudyevaluatingintraoperativeelectrochemotherapyofhepatocellularcarcinoma AT jansarado aprospectivephaseiistudyevaluatingintraoperativeelectrochemotherapyofhepatocellularcarcinoma AT popovicpeter aprospectivephaseiistudyevaluatingintraoperativeelectrochemotherapyofhepatocellularcarcinoma AT smidlojzem aprospectivephaseiistudyevaluatingintraoperativeelectrochemotherapyofhepatocellularcarcinoma AT sersagregor aprospectivephaseiistudyevaluatingintraoperativeelectrochemotherapyofhepatocellularcarcinoma AT trotovsekblaz aprospectivephaseiistudyevaluatingintraoperativeelectrochemotherapyofhepatocellularcarcinoma AT djokicmihajlo prospectivephaseiistudyevaluatingintraoperativeelectrochemotherapyofhepatocellularcarcinoma AT cemazarmaja prospectivephaseiistudyevaluatingintraoperativeelectrochemotherapyofhepatocellularcarcinoma AT bosnjakmasa prospectivephaseiistudyevaluatingintraoperativeelectrochemotherapyofhepatocellularcarcinoma AT dezmanrok prospectivephaseiistudyevaluatingintraoperativeelectrochemotherapyofhepatocellularcarcinoma AT badovinacdavid prospectivephaseiistudyevaluatingintraoperativeelectrochemotherapyofhepatocellularcarcinoma AT miklavcicdamijan prospectivephaseiistudyevaluatingintraoperativeelectrochemotherapyofhepatocellularcarcinoma AT kosbor prospectivephaseiistudyevaluatingintraoperativeelectrochemotherapyofhepatocellularcarcinoma AT stabucmiha prospectivephaseiistudyevaluatingintraoperativeelectrochemotherapyofhepatocellularcarcinoma AT stabucborut prospectivephaseiistudyevaluatingintraoperativeelectrochemotherapyofhepatocellularcarcinoma AT jansarado prospectivephaseiistudyevaluatingintraoperativeelectrochemotherapyofhepatocellularcarcinoma AT popovicpeter prospectivephaseiistudyevaluatingintraoperativeelectrochemotherapyofhepatocellularcarcinoma AT smidlojzem prospectivephaseiistudyevaluatingintraoperativeelectrochemotherapyofhepatocellularcarcinoma AT sersagregor prospectivephaseiistudyevaluatingintraoperativeelectrochemotherapyofhepatocellularcarcinoma AT trotovsekblaz prospectivephaseiistudyevaluatingintraoperativeelectrochemotherapyofhepatocellularcarcinoma |